On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> hello,
>
> would anyone object to the following small patch?
>
>
Yes, I don't think that we should entirely disable vm_lowmem events or
uma_reclaim() on pass == 0 calls to vm_pageout_scan(). However, I do
think it's reasonable to signi
hello,
would anyone object to the following small patch?
==
Index: vm_pageout.c
===
--- vm_pageout.c(revision 248560)
+++ vm_pageout.c(working copy)
@@ -882,14 +882,17 @@
vm_pageout_init_marker(&marker, PQ_I
