On Thu Apr 7 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Thu Apr 7 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Best
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> hi there,
> >> >>
>
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Thu Apr 7 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Best
>> > wrote:
>> >> hi there,
>> >>
>> >> i'd like to propose adding -Wmissing-include-dirs
On Thu Apr 7 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Best wrote:
> >> hi there,
> >>
> >> i'd like to propose adding -Wmissing-include-dirs to CWARNFLAGS. this will
> >> let
> >> tinderbox fail, if any new
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Best wrote:
>> hi there,
>>
>> i'd like to propose adding -Wmissing-include-dirs to CWARNFLAGS. this will
>> let
>> tinderbox fail, if any new kernel code was committed with (a) broken include
>> d
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i'd like to propose adding -Wmissing-include-dirs to CWARNFLAGS. this will let
> tinderbox fail, if any new kernel code was committed with (a) broken include
> dir(s).
>
> i ran a test via
>
> make toolchains
> make MAKE_JUST_K
hi there,
i'd like to propose adding -Wmissing-include-dirs to CWARNFLAGS. this will let
tinderbox fail, if any new kernel code was committed with (a) broken include
dir(s).
i ran a test via
make toolchains
make MAKE_JUST_KERNELS=yes tinderbox
and nothing seemed to go wrong with the extra warni
