On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:34:32AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Please indent the last line either 4 spaces or a tab. It is a continued
> > line.
>
> It's already indented, and we don't indent multiple times like this:
Blah, mis-read the patch. Please forget I responed before.
To Unsubscri
Hi!
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:19:17AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
DB> I'm not sure how to solve this problem non-invasively. One way to deal
DB> with it would be to include the instructions to install stat(1) if needed
DB> in UPDATING, but then if the upgrade fails for whatever reason, the user
DB>
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
> > On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > I've attempted to overcome 1) as suggested by UPDATING, by running
> > > the ``mergemaster -p'' (from src/usr.sbin/mergemaster/). This did
> > > not work well because mergemaster(8) a
Doug Barton wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > I've attempted to overcome 1) as suggested by UPDATING, by running
> > the ``mergemaster -p'' (from src/usr.sbin/mergemaster/). This did
> > not work well because mergemaster(8) attempted to use stat(1) which
> > is not present in
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:15:39AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
>
> > IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
> > *latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy
> > here.
>
> While I can't put a lot of
Doug Barton wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> > IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
> > *latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy
> > here.
>
> While I can't put a lot of time into supporting ru's efforts, and I agr
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> [
> current@ Cc:'ed because it'll be useful to a number of upgraders.
> dougb@ Cc:'ed to be aware of possible mergemaster(8) problems.
Thanks.
> 1. smmsp user was missing from /etc/passwd and /etc/group
> 2. installed 4.0 kernel did not have the si
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
> *latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy
> here.
While I can't put a lot of time into supporting ru's efforts, and I agree
that the policy should be t
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:44:58AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Um, why? I can even cross-build any of our supported arches on the
> : 4.0-RELEASE i386 box. This happens almost automatically, as part
>
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Um, why? I can even cross-build any of our supported arches on the
: 4.0-RELEASE i386 box. This happens almost automatically, as part
: of the cross-arch work tasks.
I think that there are some build tools t
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:28:50AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 05:03:03PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Index: Makefile.inc1
> > ===
> > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/Makefile.inc1,v
> > retrieving revision 1.31
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 05:03:03PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Index: Makefile.inc1
> ===
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/Makefile.inc1,v
> retrieving revision 1.312
> diff -u -r1.312 Makefile.inc1
> --- Makefile.inc1 14 Nov 2002 19:
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 11:11:29AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Daniel C. Sobral" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : There I go reply to all...
> :
> : IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
> : *latest* version in the 3.x
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 12:12:36PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> > > There I go reply to all...
> > >
> > > IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
> > > *latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy
> > > here.
> >
> > Agree, I don't see
Hey ru!
These patches are only one '/' different from what I build on my 4.3,
4.5 and 4.6.2 systems w/o a new make being installed. All built
perfectly! Thanks!
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Daniel C. Sobral" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: There I go reply to all...
:
: IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
: *latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy
: here.
ru@ has stepped up to
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
> Apparently, On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 01:15:00PM -0200,
> Daniel C. Sobral said words to the effect of;
>
> > There I go reply to all...
> >
> > IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
> > *latest* version in the 3.x s
Apparently, On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 01:15:00PM -0200,
Daniel C. Sobral said words to the effect of;
> There I go reply to all...
>
> IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
> *latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy
> here.
Agre
[Cc: to re@ dropped to avoid unnecessary load]
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 01:15:00PM -0200, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> There I go reply to all...
>
> IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
> *latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy
> here.
There I go reply to all...
IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
*latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy
here.
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> [
> current@ Cc:'ed because it'll be useful to a number of upgraders.
> dougb@ Cc:'ed to be aw
[
current@ Cc:'ed because it'll be useful to a number of upgraders.
dougb@ Cc:'ed to be aware of possible mergemaster(8) problems.
imp@ Cc:'ed to be aware of incorrect UPDATING instruction.
peter@ Cc:'ed to LOL about foot-shooting with anti-foot-shooting.
re@ Cc:'ed to consider approving the a
21 matches
Mail list logo
