Terry Lambert wrote:
> > I'll take a whack at it and send it out by tomorrow, working or not.
>
> Don't bother. 8-).
>
> The attached patch makes it compile, and takes a shot at doing the
> right thing.
Just a followup... select definitely won't work (IMO), but needs
someone who is threads-sav
Nate Lawson wrote:
> > It's not so much that I volunteered as I said that I'd help with
> > thread/proc issues..
> > The trouble was that there are places where it used a proc in the old
> > code, but in some cases it needs to be a proc, and in other cases it now
> > needs to be a thread. But all t