On Tuesday 27 March 2012 09:39 pm, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 03/27/12 17:13, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > The upstream maintainer just e-mailed me a possible fix for the
> > problem and it looks very promising. Please try the attached
> > patch. Note the patch reverts r233555 and applies the fix. Th
On 27/03/2012 23:13, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
The upstream maintainer just e-mailed me a possible fix for the
problem and it looks very promising. Please try the attached patch.
Fixed the issue on my X61s, thanks :)
Sevan
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Andreas Tobler schrieb:
On 28.03.12 00:13, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> The upstream maintainer just e-mailed me a possible fix for the
> problem and it looks very promising. Please try the attached patch.
> Note the patch reverts r233555 and applies the fix. This patch is
> also available from here:
>
On 28.03.12 00:13, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
The upstream maintainer just e-mailed me a possible fix for the
problem and it looks very promising. Please try the attached patch.
Note the patch reverts r233555 and applies the fix. This patch is
also available from here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/
On 03/27/12 17:13, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
The upstream maintainer just e-mailed me a possible fix for the
problem and it looks very promising. Please try the attached patch.
Note the patch reverts r233555 and applies the fix. This patch is
also available from here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/
The upstream maintainer just e-mailed me a possible fix for the
problem and it looks very promising. Please try the attached patch.
Note the patch reverts r233555 and applies the fix. This patch is
also available from here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/acpi_refcnt.diff
Thanks!
Jung-uk K
