Hi,
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 20:48:56 -0500 (EST)
> Andrew Gallatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
gallatin> The ifdefs are there because the linux hack^W OS uses a different
gallatin> syscall table on each platform, with a different ABI (eg, the same
gallatin> syscall may take 3 args on x86 and
Hajimu UMEMOTO writes:
> dwmalone>2) The patches wouldn't compile on the alpha 'cos of some
> dwmalone>ifdefs in the linux emulation code. I just hadn't got around
> dwmalone>to resolving this.
>
> Oops, thank you for pointing this out. It seems that other than
> linux_connect
Hi,
>>> Mon, 20 Jan 2003 18:18:41 +0900,
>>> Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
dwmalone> Maybe we could see if we could combine these patches? My patch is
dwmalone> available at:
dwmalone> http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dwmalone/linux-socket
ume> I think so, too.
I've tried to merge your
Hi,
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 19:59:57 +
> David Malone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
dwmalone> I have a patch which is quite similar to this, but also reduces the
dwmalone> use of the stackgap in the Linux networking code and breaks out
dwmalone> things like socket, bind and listen into an i
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:49:26AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> I wrote an IPv6 support for Linux sym. I've tested it with RHL8's
> ftp(1) and ports/www/linux-phoenix, and it seems nicely running with
> both an IPv4 and an IPv6.
> You can obtain my patch from:
>
> http://www.imasy.or.jp/~
Hi,
I wrote an IPv6 support for Linux sym. I've tested it with RHL8's
ftp(1) and ports/www/linux-phoenix, and it seems nicely running with
both an IPv4 and an IPv6.
You can obtain my patch from:
http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/FreeBSD/linux-ipv6.diff
Please review it.
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu