On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Steve Kargl <
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:57:22AM -0400, Joe Nosay wrote:
> > I have a snapshot saved proving that I am not top posting and only using
> > the bottom reply box. I did not know that gmail automatically top
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:57:22AM -0400, Joe Nosay wrote:
> I have a snapshot saved proving that I am not top posting and only using
> the bottom reply box. I did not know that gmail automatically top posts
> replies. I am willing to take a polygraph test to prove I am telling the
> truth. Steve K
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, Joe Nosay wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Joe Nosay wrote:
Someone had to tell me what to do.
Steve, are you the only person in the multiverse that is free of making any
mistakes?
Nobody was accusing you of doing it intentionally. Anyway, that problem
is now
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Joe Nosay wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:07 PM, N.J. Mann wrote:
>
>> In message <
>> ca+wntosdueh1gzuzg3g4gcw-y7+llrmvace5bhbl9rtzxs+...@mail.gmail.com>,
>> Joe Nosay (superbisq...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> > I have a snapshot saved proving that I
In message ,
Joe Nosay (superbisq...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I have a snapshot saved proving that I am not top posting and only using
> the bottom reply box. I did not know that gmail automatically top posts
> replies. I am willing to take a polygraph test to prove I am telling the
> truth. Ste
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:07 PM, N.J. Mann wrote:
> In message <
> ca+wntosdueh1gzuzg3g4gcw-y7+llrmvace5bhbl9rtzxs+...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Joe Nosay (superbisq...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > I have a snapshot saved proving that I am not top posting and only using
> > the bottom reply box. I did
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Joe Nosay wrote:
> I have a snapshot saved proving that I am not top posting and only using
> the bottom reply box. I did not know that gmail automatically top posts
> replies. I am willing to take a polygraph test to prove I am telling the
> truth. Steve Kargl,
I have a snapshot saved proving that I am not top posting and only using
the bottom reply box. I did not know that gmail automatically top posts
replies. I am willing to take a polygraph test to prove I am telling the
truth. Steve Kargl, you think that I am lying but I have proof right here.
I am w
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 09:23:34PM -0400, Joe Nosay wrote:
> I am not top posting.
Yes, you are.
> Do not accuse me of this.
I'm just stating fact.
> I am upset and depressed and I do not need you to accuse me of something I
> am not doing.
Whatever.
> My system is shitting out on me.
Good l
On 2013-10-13 00:06, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
>> On 2013-10-12 21:23, Joe Nosay wrote:
>>> I am not top posting.
>>> Do not accuse me of this.
>>> I am upset and depressed and I do not need you to accuse me of something I
>>> am not doing.
>>> My sys
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
> On 2013-10-12 21:23, Joe Nosay wrote:
>> I am not top posting.
>> Do not accuse me of this.
>> I am upset and depressed and I do not need you to accuse me of something I
>> am not doing.
>> My system is shitting out on me.
>> I have already tol
On 2013-10-12 21:23, Joe Nosay wrote:
> I am not top posting.
> Do not accuse me of this.
> I am upset and depressed and I do not need you to accuse me of something I
> am not doing.
> My system is shitting out on me.
> I have already told you what is happening.
> Stop accusing me of something I am
I am not top posting.
Do not accuse me of this.
I am upset and depressed and I do not need you to accuse me of something I
am not doing.
My system is shitting out on me.
I have already told you what is happening.
Stop accusing me of something I am not doing.
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Steve
Please, do not top post. It loses context.
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 04:05:27PM -0400, Joe Nosay wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Steve Kargl <
> s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:05:56PM -0400, Joe Nosay wrote:
> > > Is the ALPHA base stable e
On Oct 12, 2013, at 23:27, Joe Nosay wrote:
> $ lynx
> /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9: Undefined symbol "libiconv_set_relocation_prefix"
> $
> $ firefox
> XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxpcom.so:
> /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0: Undefined symbol "libiconv"
> Couldn't load X
There.
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Joe Nosay wrote:
> I was rebuilding world using an older CURRENT base and the src from
> 10/07/13. The build kept breaking with libiconv, msun, and a few others.
> This affected both the base and 3rd party. The system is still usable but
> it isn't stabl
I was rebuilding world using an older CURRENT base and the src from
10/07/13. The build kept breaking with libiconv, msun, and a few others.
This affected both the base and 3rd party. The system is still usable but
it isn't stable enough for building a 3rd party application. If I reinstall
the base
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:05:56PM -0400, Joe Nosay wrote:
> Is the ALPHA base stable enough to do porting of applications?
>
Huh? What do you mean? People have been running freebsd-current
for years and porting applications to FreeBSD. Alpha is simply
a point in time for freebsd-current.
--
Is the ALPHA base stable enough to do porting of applications?
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Joe Nosay wrote:
>
> I did. Looks like I hosed part of the system but I am using it now. I'm
> getting libiconv errors. Vi has been replaced with nvi. Neat. I need to
> extract /base over /base. So,
I did. Looks like I hosed part of the system but I am using it now. I'm
getting libiconv errors. Vi has been replaced with nvi. Neat. I need to
extract /base over /base. So, um, time to use the CD and set up a new
system,right?
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> Since ther
Since there is -Wall in your CFALGS there will be quite a few warnings,
which combined with -Werror which promotes warnings to errors makes it fail.
Try removing -Wall and see if it works. Also -mssse3 can trigger more
subtle stuff.
Best regards
Andreas
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Joe Nosa
Yes, I did. To what extent did I screw up?
# added by use.perl 2013-03-03 23:39:20
PERL_VERSION=5.16.2
RUBY_DEFAULT_VER=1.9
ALLOW_SHARED_TEXTREL=1
CFLAGS+= -mssse3 -Wall
CXXFLAGS+= -mssse3
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Steve Kargl <
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 0
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 09:00:11PM -0400, Joe Nosay wrote:
> Src is from 10/7/13 on i386. Base is from April.
> cc -O2 -pipe -mssse3 -Wall -I/usr/src/lib/msun/x86 -I/usr/src/lib/msun/ld80
> -I/usr/src/lib/msun/src -I/usr/src/lib/msun/../libc/include
> -I/usr/src/lib/msun/../libc/i386 -std=gnu
Src is from 10/7/13 on i386. Base is from April.
cc -O2 -pipe -mssse3 -Wall -I/usr/src/lib/msun/x86 -I/usr/src/lib/msun/ld80
-I/usr/src/lib/msun/src -I/usr/src/lib/msun/../libc/include
-I/usr/src/lib/msun/../libc/i386 -std=gnu99 -Qunused-arguments
-fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -W
24 matches
Mail list logo
