On Mar 26, 2012, at 1:42 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 26/03/2012 11:04 Boris Samorodov said the following:
>> 26.03.2012 03:25, Tim Kientzle пишет:
>>> Boris: What filesystem are you using?
>>
>> zfs
>>
>
> Could this particular instance of the problem be triggered by
> http://www.freebsd.org/
on 26/03/2012 15:01 Boris Samorodov said the following:
> On 26.03.2012 15:36, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 26/03/2012 13:30 Boris Samorodov said the following:
>>> On 26.03.2012 12:42, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 26/03/2012 11:04 Boris Samorodov said the following:
> 26.03.2012 03:25, Tim Kientzl
On 26.03.2012 15:36, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 26/03/2012 13:30 Boris Samorodov said the following:
On 26.03.2012 12:42, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 26/03/2012 11:04 Boris Samorodov said the following:
26.03.2012 03:25, Tim Kientzle пишет:
Boris: What filesystem are you using?
zfs
Could this p
on 26/03/2012 13:30 Boris Samorodov said the following:
> On 26.03.2012 12:42, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 26/03/2012 11:04 Boris Samorodov said the following:
>>> 26.03.2012 03:25, Tim Kientzle пишет:
Boris: What filesystem are you using?
>>>
>>> zfs
>>
>> Could this particular instance of the
On 26.03.2012 12:42, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 26/03/2012 11:04 Boris Samorodov said the following:
26.03.2012 03:25, Tim Kientzle пишет:
Boris: What filesystem are you using?
zfs
Could this particular instance of the problem be triggered by
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=164445
on 26/03/2012 11:04 Boris Samorodov said the following:
> 26.03.2012 03:25, Tim Kientzle пишет:
>> Boris: What filesystem are you using?
>
> zfs
>
Could this particular instance of the problem be triggered by
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=164445
?
--
Andriy Gapon
26.03.2012 03:25, Tim Kientzle пишет:
>
> On Mar 25, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
>
>> On (25/03/2012 10:53), Tim Kientzle wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 25, 2012, at 5:53 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>>>
On 24.03.2012 21:00, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>
> On Mar 23, 2012, at 9:51 PM, Boris S
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 04:32:53PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>
> On Mar 25, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
>
> > I experience a related issue. lseek(SEEK_HOLE) error checks are too
> > strict. Files are not added to archive if lseek(SEEK_HOLE) fails.
> > Ignoring lseek(SEEK_HOLE) at least
On Mar 25, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> I experience a related issue. lseek(SEEK_HOLE) error checks are too
> strict. Files are not added to archive if lseek(SEEK_HOLE) fails.
> Ignoring lseek(SEEK_HOLE) at least in ENOTTY case would be preferable.
Just noticed that lseek(1) doesn't d
On Mar 25, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> On (25/03/2012 10:53), Tim Kientzle wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 25, 2012, at 5:53 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>>
>>> On 24.03.2012 21:00, Tim Kientzle wrote:
On Mar 23, 2012, at 9:51 PM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
Can you send me the o
On (25/03/2012 10:53), Tim Kientzle wrote:
>
> On Mar 25, 2012, at 5:53 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>
> > On 24.03.2012 21:00, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mar 23, 2012, at 9:51 PM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> >>
> >> Can you send me the output of:
> >>
> >> tar -cvf /tmp/test.tar
> >> /usr/p
25.03.2012 21:53, Tim Kientzle пишет:
>
> On Mar 25, 2012, at 5:53 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>
>> On 24.03.2012 21:00, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 23, 2012, at 9:51 PM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>>>
>>> Can you send me the output of:
>>>
>>> tar -cvf /tmp/test.tar
>>> /usr/ports/devel/nspr/
On Mar 25, 2012, at 5:53 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On 24.03.2012 21:00, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 23, 2012, at 9:51 PM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>>
>> Can you send me the output of:
>>
>> tar -cvf /tmp/test.tar
>> /usr/ports/devel/nspr/work/nspr-4.9/mozilla/nsprpub/build/dist/lib/../.
On 24.03.2012 21:00, Tim Kientzle wrote:
On Mar 23, 2012, at 9:51 PM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On 24.03.2012 01:29, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-03-23 21:12, Boris Samorodov wrote:
I'm not sure but it seems to me that the question is more about
-current that -ports.
While updating devel/nspr
24.03.2012 21:00, Tim Kientzle пишет:
> Can you send me the output of:
Sure. I'll do it tomorrow (the machine is at work).
--
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org maili
24.03.2012 19:04, Garrett Cooper пишет:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>> On 24.03.2012 01:29, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2012-03-23 21:12, Boris Samorodov wrote:
I'm not sure but it seems to me that the question is more about
-current that -ports.
>
On Mar 23, 2012, at 9:51 PM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On 24.03.2012 01:29, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 2012-03-23 21:12, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>>> I'm not sure but it seems to me that the question is more about
>>> -current that -ports.
>>>
>>> While updating devel/nspr I get this:
>> ...
>>> /
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On 24.03.2012 01:29, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>
>> On 2012-03-23 21:12, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not sure but it seems to me that the question is more about
>>> -current that -ports.
>>>
>>> While updating devel/nspr I get this:
>>
On 24.03.2012 01:29, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-03-23 21:12, Boris Samorodov wrote:
I'm not sure but it seems to me that the question is more about
-current that -ports.
While updating devel/nspr I get this:
...
/usr/bin/strip: /usr/local/lib/libnspr4.so.1: File format not recognized
It
19 matches
Mail list logo
