Re: /usr/games/wtf

2001-08-21 Thread scanner
> I can't see any benefits to having this in the base system. > > Make it a port instead. Oh and /usr/games/wargames is such a huge benefit? By that logic all of /usr/games belong as ports. Which I wont argue with at all.

Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th

2000-01-06 Thread scanner
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, David O'Brien wrote: > And when will IPv6 fully be in 4-CURRENT? > Besides offering two cents what else can you offer to make this happen? > Time? More money? > > People here aren't backing their opinions by tell us *how* their to make > their opinions happen. I cant do any

Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th

2000-01-06 Thread scanner
On Thu, 6 Jan 100, Darren Reed wrote: > For what it's worth, I think releasing 4.0 *without* IPv6 support > is a mistake. Why ? Because in < 12 months FreeBSD 5.0 will be > released *with* IPv6 support (I'd count IPv6 as being a big enough > change to signify a major release number change). I

Re: FreeBSD security auditing project.

1999-11-24 Thread scanner
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Doug Rabson wrote: > We need to put audit tags into the source tree when a file is audited. > That allows the diffs to be audited later which should be a smaller job > and then the audit tag slides forward. Not to interrupt in the middle of this discussion but you mi