Re: FreeBSD 14.0-BETA5 Now Available

2023-10-23 Thread monochrome
ventoy has only been working with freebsd since 12 or so, it was not working before since I started using ventoy. Also ventoy won't boot the new devuan release, for example. ventoy has to jump through hoops to get some things to boot, so give it some time I guess. On 10/23/23 11:06, Rodney W.

Re: freebsd 13 ryzen micro stutter

2021-04-02 Thread monochrome
OP here, I've been running with kern.sched.steal_thresh=1 with no stutter since it was originally suggested. I tried these instead and I get stutter, maybe a little less but its definitely back. On 4/3/21 1:23 AM, Rozhuk Ivan wrote: I have no micro stutter with default kern.sched.steal_thresh

freebsd 13 ryzen micro stutter

2021-03-22 Thread monochrome
After about 8 months of struggling to narrow this down I did another search and saw this: https://www.reddit.com/r/freebsd/comments/lc8fwo/freebsd_13_vega_64_micro_stutter_in_x/ I haven't seen this come up here so I thought I would bring it up. My story started sometime before around August la

Re: drm-fbsd13-kmod pkg-descr

2021-01-29 Thread monochrome
heh I got worried because my ryzen vega needs 4.17 and up On 1/29/21 5:05 AM, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 04:59:27 -0500 monochrome wrote: correct me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't it say: Currently corresponding to Linux 5.4.62 DRM. instead of: Currently correspondin

drm-fbsd13-kmod pkg-descr

2021-01-29 Thread monochrome
correct me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't it say: Currently corresponding to Linux 5.4.62 DRM. instead of: Currently corresponding to Linux 4.16 DRM. got caught by this while trying to update drm-devel-kmod from ports on stable/13, and took a chance that it was just an oversight :)

problem building virtualbox-ose-kmod

2021-01-25 Thread monochrome
having this issue building virtualbox-ose-kmod, its been like this for a while but I deinstalled and forgot, for quite a while now, maybe over a month. now that I've moved from 13-current to stable/13 I thought I would try to put it back, but it still wont build. I haven't seen anyone else with

Re: Getting /usr/src to match specific git hash?

2021-01-24 Thread monochrome
after looking in the git log for the hash I use: git -C /usr/src reset --hard you will lose any local changes On 1/24/21 5:40 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 03:22:18PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: On Sun, Jan 24, 2021, 12:14 PM Steve Kargl wrote: Any advice on how to jump,

Re: boot loader blank screen

2021-01-13 Thread monochrome
I should add my experience to this since its different and haven't seen anyone else mention it. I see the new boot loader, it's not blank, but its large text, and it's very SLOW. I can see each char drawn, and then when it gets to the bottom and has to redraw all the lines to scroll up for new l

Re: git and the loss of revision numbers

2020-12-29 Thread monochrome
local changes. Though it does blow away changes to the conf file, that's a lesser issue to deal with. thanks! On 12/29/20 9:37 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 2020-12-29 02:56, Pete Wright wrote: On 12/28/20 4:38 PM, monochrome wrote: what would be the git command for reverting source to a pre

Re: git and the loss of revision numbers

2020-12-29 Thread monochrome
On 12/29/20 7:15 AM, Kristof Provost wrote: On 29 Dec 2020, at 4:33, monochrome wrote: sry forgot details: source tree @ ead01bfe8 git -C /usr/src checkout gf20c0e331 error: pathspec 'gf20c0e331' did not match any file(s) known to git what is the 'g' for? That would

Re: git and the loss of revision numbers

2020-12-28 Thread monochrome
On 12/28/20 7:56 PM, Pete Wright wrote: On 12/28/20 4:38 PM, monochrome wrote: what would be the git command for reverting source to a previous version using these numbers? for example, with svn and old numbers: svnlite update -r367627 /usr/src I will generally just checkout the short git

Re: git and the loss of revision numbers

2020-12-28 Thread monochrome
ne mention that a 12 digit shortened hash is the standard to use, yet uname only spits out 9? thanks On 12/28/20 7:56 PM, Pete Wright wrote: On 12/28/20 4:38 PM, monochrome wrote: what would be the git command for reverting source to a previous version using these numbers? for example, with s

Re: git and the loss of revision numbers

2020-12-28 Thread monochrome
what would be the git command for reverting source to a previous version using these numbers? for example, with svn and old numbers: svnlite update -r367627 /usr/src this is needed often when it blows up for someone tracking current On 12/28/20 11:27 AM, Ed Maste wrote: On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 at

geeqie, and neverball build problem on 13-current

2020-09-24 Thread monochrome
Not sure how long this has been a problem, I noticed with the new version of geeqie (geeqie-devel builds fine) and found the neverball problem when rebuilding all packages to investigate. neverball output changes with consecutive build attempts, geeqie does not. --

Re: Fwd: Re: r365488 page faults on AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

2020-09-21 Thread monochrome
Rainer, I'm all up and running and clean with the latest again, if it still doesn't work after your next try, send me your step-by-step to patch and i'll try it here. I'm using ryzen video so I have to disable stuff to even see the fault messages. On 9/22/20 1:06 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote: Am

Re: Fwd: Re: r365488 page faults on AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

2020-09-19 Thread monochrome
Sunday, so can't investigate ATM. And no, I haven't solved it until now. Thanks for your report. Rainer Am 18. September 2020 00:38:31 MESZ schrieb monochrome : forgot you Forwarded Message Subject: Re: r365488 page faults on AMD Ryzen 9 3950X Date: Thu, 17 Sep 202

Re: r365488 page faults on AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

2020-09-17 Thread monochrome
I am also having this problem. Have you resolved it? Mine is a Ryzen 5 2400G On 9/12/20 5:22 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote: Since r365488 (and above until recent) my box breaks with the following error when starting: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 31; apic id = 1f fault virtu