>
> It is *that* simple.
>
yep.
> Rather than bitch that 3.1.1 "sucks"; we should thanking the GCC
> Steering
> Committee that after much thought they were willing to take the
> vendors'
> needs into account. I am not sure FreeBSD would have done the same.
>
I never said it sucked... I think
On Saturday, August 31, 2002, at 06:04 PM, Terry Lambert wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
>>> Because rather than leaving it alone for a while, they are already
>>> planning a 3.3. 8-).
>>>
>>> And comments on this list to that effect.
>>
>> I don't follow. The GCC group branches previous to a re
Thanks for the tip!
On Monday, August 19, 2002, at 09:21 PM, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hey... I am new here and just want to check things out for a bit and
>> see
>> if I can't pitch in...
>>
>> At the very least I will try to build CURRENT from tim
Darwin is just one of my pursuits :)
I am currently just going to play around with current when I have time :)
I actually do care to make FBSD 5.0 kickass if I can help... even as a
tester.
Dave
On Monday, August 19, 2002, at 09:13 PM, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 08:19:53PM -
Hey... I am new here and just want to check things out for a bit and see
if I can't pitch in...
At the very least I will try to build CURRENT from time to time and run
some programs... maybe somewhere down the road I can commit something
worthwhile.
I also wanted to see if my filter worked on
