Re: [HEADSUP] ZFS version 15 committed to head

2010-07-14 Thread Attila Nagy
Hi, On 07/13/2010 04:02 PM, Martin Matuska wrote: For people interested in running this on 8.1 I will provide patches for releng/8.1 and stable/8 as soon as 8.1 gets released. Previously, I've run earlier versions (8) with sys/cddl taken from head. Is this a no-go with what we have currently i

Re: Daily lockups on 5.2-BETA (maybe pst driver bug?)

2003-12-02 Thread Attila Nagy
its Windows stuff, but first I need to install a Windows somewhere... Thanks. -- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU) phone @work: +361 210 1415/127 ISOs: http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download

Daily lockups on 5.2-BETA (maybe pst driver bug?)

2003-12-02 Thread Attila Nagy
MB [79656/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 acd0: CDROM at ata1-master PIO4 pst0: on pstpci0 GEOM: create disk pst0 dp=0xc7dfe78c pst0: 572204MB [72945/255/63] on pstpci0 pstpci0: [MPSAFE] SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a Any ideas about this one? Thanks, -- Attila Nag

maildir with softupdates

2003-07-23 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello, Is this statement still valid? "ext3 is unsafe for maildir, and with softupdates, so is ffs." http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0202/0358.html Thanks, -- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU) phone @

ng_fec

2003-03-27 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello, The netgraph module fails to build. Could you please take a look at that (and connect it to the build)? /sys/modules/netgraph/fec Thanks, --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-21 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello, > Do you have "option MAXMEM" set in your kernel config file? No. --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361

Re: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-20 Thread Attila Nagy
nset the acpi_load variable (so I don't load ACPI) it works. I'm glad to test any patches. --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU)

Re: MAKEDEV lost in 5.0-CURRENT?

2003-03-13 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello, > Hint: cp /dev/null /dev/[what is your root device outside the jail] I meant /dev/zero of course ;) (or /dev/random for the patient one) --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: MAKEDEV lost in 5.0-CURRENT?

2003-03-13 Thread Attila Nagy
s like file to set up those devfs rules. :) --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]------ Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361

Re: devstat_end_transaction: HELP!! busy_count for da1 is < 0 (-1)!

2003-03-12 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello, > There is a patch which can be tried at: > http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/ken.patch I dumped some GBs over the wire with this and haven't seen any ill effects. Thanks, --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]--

Re: devstat_end_transaction: HELP!! busy_count for da1 is < 0 (-1)!

2003-03-11 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello, > Yes, I just got this myself today. I overlooked that devstat is not > locked when I moved the devstat to geom_disk. Expect a patch tonight. Great, thanks! --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy

devstat_end_transaction: HELP!! busy_count for da1 is < 0 (-1)!

2003-03-11 Thread Attila Nagy
Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]------ Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194) cell.: +3630 306 6758 To Unsubscribe: sen

Re: FreeBSD 5.0R panic: bwrite: buffer is not busy???

2003-03-10 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello, > Here the messages that appears in console: The panic appears randomly > after the boot , it can be an hour as can be 3 or more hours . Could you please try to upgrade to -CURRENT? --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attil

Re: panic: bwrite: buffer is not busy???

2003-03-06 Thread Attila Nagy
is one? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/46861 I get these every day, don't matter if the machine is an SMP one, or just a UP. (I tried and can reproduce this panic on at least 3 different machines) --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-

Re: Freeze after APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery

2003-03-05 Thread Attila Nagy
the tree, recompiled and it works again. Thanks! --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]------ Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210

Freeze after APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery

2003-03-05 Thread Attila Nagy
n the previous) and it freezes, no matter the ACPI is loaded or not. Any ideas? ps: the machine is a dual Xeon with HTT enabled. Thanks, --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Sof

Re: Checksum offload support for Intel 82550/82551

2003-02-27 Thread Attila Nagy
ll report any problems. I will connect the machine to an other switch, maybe tomorrow to test whether the VLAN trunking works or not. Thanks a lot! --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fre

Re: Checksum offload support for Intel 82550/82551

2003-02-26 Thread Attila Nagy
ore time, but can provide remote access to resources. --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194)

Re: Checksum offload support for Intel 82550/82551

2003-02-25 Thread Attila Nagy
-[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194) cell.: +3630 306 6758 To Unsu

Re: Does bg fsck have problems with large filesystems?

2003-02-11 Thread Attila Nagy
sole access is needed... --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194) cell.: +3630 306

Re: Does bg fsck have problems with large filesystems?

2003-02-10 Thread Attila Nagy
w.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194) cell.: +3630 306 6758 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: Does bg fsck have problems with large filesystems?

2003-02-10 Thread Attila Nagy
e this issue. I also gave him access to our machine, which has a 1.2 TB filesystem on it. I hope he can get in before I have to take that machine into production :) --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [E

Re: L440gx+ serial BIOS needs text mode

2003-02-04 Thread Attila Nagy
-[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194) cell.: +3630 306 6758

Re: L440gx+ serial BIOS needs text mode

2003-02-03 Thread Attila Nagy
nge, I noted. What do you mean under autodetection? --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 141

Re: L440gx+ serial BIOS needs text mode

2003-02-03 Thread Attila Nagy
S from that point is launched to the nearest galaxy's trashcan via hyperspace, I mean is not functional. You have to set up the serial console. --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free

Re: Does bg fsck have problems with large filesystems?

2003-01-28 Thread Attila Nagy
ou will be very-very patient :) --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194)

Re: Does bg fsck have problems with large filesystems?

2003-01-28 Thread Attila Nagy
ed. (ssh or console, for the latter I have to get another box and a cable) No remote reset switch, BTW :( --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU)

Re: Does bg fsck have problems with large filesystems?

2003-01-28 Thread Attila Nagy
TW, the big partitions are those which needs the extra time, so it is very likely that you won't benefit too much from this... --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: Does bg fsck have problems with large filesystems?

2003-01-28 Thread Attila Nagy
If anybody wants to look into this problem, I can give access to the machine (even serial console)... --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU)

Re: No man page for /etc/malloc.conf ?

2003-01-24 Thread Attila Nagy
[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194) cell.: +3630 306 6758

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 Available

2003-01-21 Thread Attila Nagy
61 hits me hard, so I would need quick reboots :) (the machines gives me reboots in a time interval of 3 hours to 3 days, depending on the network traffic) ps: any chance to get a quick peek on kern/46861? :) Thanks! --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila N

Re: FreeBSD 5.0 Available

2003-01-20 Thread Attila Nagy
ks, --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194) cell.: +3630 306 6758

Re: PANIC in tcp_syncache.c sonewconn() line 562

2003-01-13 Thread Attila Nagy
affic it had only 3 hours... --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]------ Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194)

devfs configuration

2003-01-10 Thread Attila Nagy
http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194) cell.: +3630 306 6758 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT

Re: FEC on 5.x

2002-12-30 Thread Attila Nagy
fec ngctl msg fec0: add_iface '"fxp0"' ngctl msg fec0: add_iface '"fxp1"' ngctl msg fec0: set_mode_inet ifconfig fec0 a.b.c.d netmask 255.255.255.252 up The interface becomes up (according to the switch and FreeBSD) and shows the above ef

[PORT] mozilla-0.9.3.1 compile error in xpidl.c

2001-09-18 Thread attila!
port: Mozilla operating system built from 5.0 CURRENT cvsup: 28 Aug 01 1600 GMT ===> Extracting for mozilla-0.9.3,1 >> Checksum OK for mozilla-source-0.9.3.tar.bz2. ... gmake[3]: Entering directory \ `/us0r/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/xpcom/typelib/xpidl'

[PORT] mozilla-0.9.3.1 compile error in xpidl.c

2001-09-18 Thread attila!
port: Mozilla operating system built from 5.0 CURRENT cvsup: 28 Aug 01 1600 GMT ===> Extracting for mozilla-0.9.3,1 >> Checksum OK for mozilla-source-0.9.3.tar.bz2. ... gmake[3]: Entering directory \ `/us0r/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/xpcom/typelib/xpidl'

Re: POSTFIX-- version 20001005

2000-10-10 Thread attila!
on Mon, 9 Oct 2000 13:58:19 +0200, Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> replied: + [snip] + + At 9:22 PM + 2000/10/8, attila! wrote: + + > 20001001 is the most current which Wietse is now running and + > stating that it is 'production quality'. Obviously, I will

Re: POSTFIX-- Wietse: tweak and go! --pkg & port: both duds

2000-10-08 Thread attila!
d. I am a firm believer in KISS for the unwashed, and will therefore establish the initial configuration with defaults to eliminate the questions in the install script. I am perfectly well willing to maintain it in cvs format. attila out... -- M$ -Where do you

Re: POSTFIX-- Wietse: tweak and go! --pkg & port: both duds

2000-10-08 Thread attila!
on 8 Oct 2000 13:14:14 +0200, Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> responded: + At 7:02 AM + 2000/10/8, attila! wrote: + + > (a) pick a directory and 'tar -zxf snapshot-2531.tar.gz' + > + > (b) 'cd snapshot-2531' + + Three things: + + 1. You don

re: sio problems?

2000-10-08 Thread attila!
on Sat, 7 Oct 2000 20:03:12 -0500 (CDT), Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I recently got my digital camera back out, and started pulling the old > pictures from it. I noticed something I hadn't ever seen before - silo > overflows from the sio port. At the moment, I'm wondering if this is a

very high CPU time demand from process #10 ('idle')

2000-10-08 Thread attila!
-- ps -ax -- 0 ?? DLs0:00.40 (swapper) 1 ?? ILs0:00.07 /sbin/init -- 2 ?? DL 0:04.23 (pagedaemon) 3 ?? DL 0:00.65 (vmdaemon) 4 ?? DL 0:00.70 (bufdaemon) 5 ?? DL 0:44.85 (syncer) 10 ?? RL 4986:29.70 (idle) 11 ?? WL

POSTFIX-- Wietse: tweak and go! --pkg & port: both duds

2000-10-07 Thread attila!
#x27;sendmail'. After postfix is installed, 'mailq' only looks at the postfix queue; so: /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail -bp will show the old sendmail queue; the original sendmail at this point is only monitoring its own queue. (k) Create or add to file /etc

'device random' required in conf file?

2000-09-24 Thread attila!
buildkernel based on cvs pulled 2000 09 24 1420 UCT: linking kernel if_spppsubr.o: in function `sppp_chap_scr': if_spppsubr.o(.text+0x3f54): undefined reference to `read_random' *** error code 1 stop in /usr/src/obj/usr/src/sys/hun. adding (pseudo)device ran

re: Kernel build failing in ip6_input.c

2000-08-05 Thread attila!
1.6 2000.08.01.00.40.32 ache attila out... on Sat, 5 Aug 2000 20:49:21 -0300 (ADT), Brandon Hume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I went about a week without updating my source tree, but yesterday when I > went to build a kernel (and day), I get the following: > .

usr.sbin/xntpd missing in 5.0-CURRENT

2000-04-25 Thread attila!
in 5.0-CURRENT as of this morning (Tue, 25) usr.sbin/xntpd was not in the cvs files. too a copy from a 3.1 disk; same version 3.4e. --it works. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: __func__ not declared for kernel build (5.0-CURRENT)

2000-04-24 Thread attila!
thing. attila out... -- No, I don't suffer from insanity - I enjoy every minute of it. On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > :> obviously missing __FUNCTION__ was added by GCC many years ago, but it was > :>

attachable driver modules (Re: Stale modules (Re: panic in the morning))

2000-04-23 Thread attila!
ff the desktop, we need to be user- friendly --that, and hope Judge Jackson forces 'Office' into Open Source which would sure light BadBillyG's fire! attila out... -- Caveat: No Microsoft programs or processes were used in the creation or distribution

on the road to stomping out __func__

2000-04-23 Thread attila!
'BOTD' in netstat.c had not crept in... On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: + On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, attila! wrote: + + > '__func__ is not found for either the 'GENERIC' or 'hun' target. + + __func__ is a new feature in C99.

__func__ not declared for kernel build (5.0-CURRENT)

2000-04-22 Thread attila!
...trying to upgrade from 4.0-CURRENT (last update 21 Jul 99) to 5.0-CURRENT (22 Apr at 0419 UCT) using cvsup over 56K. I know, I know, I fell behind, but it was doing its thing --ran for 272 days without even restarting X although the aux generator fired up during a couple po

Re: 'miibus_if.h' file missing for 'dc' ethernet driver

2000-04-20 Thread attila!
...carefully. attila out! -- No, I don't suffer from insanity; I enjoy every minute of it! < is LINT prior to 18 Apr > is LINT after 18 Apr which tells you WHY you need 'miibus' 168d1823 < devicemiibus # MII bus s

'miibus_if.h' file missing for 'dc' ethernet driver

2000-04-19 Thread attila!
> ../../pci/if_dc.c:151: miibus_if.h: No such file or directory > mkdep: compile failed 'find' on entire sys subsystem fails to show it, and I pulled cvsups on 19th and 20th to see if it was in the stream --nope. pulled a 'glimpse' of 'current' list but found no reference. To

Re: "JAIL" code headed for -current.

1999-03-25 Thread attila
I just noticed the date on this discussion was two months ago; so I referenced the code in kern_prot.c which indicates no decision was made on this item was another solution implemented? actually, in a more deliberate consideration of the implications of changing the

Re: "JAIL" code headed for -current.

1999-03-25 Thread attila
add my vote for 3.1 chroot() has always been a little less than JAIL if the user so constrained expects/requires access to virtually anything. __ go not unto usenet for advice, for the inhabitants thereof wil