Re: The kern.ipc.somaxconn limit revisited.

2015-10-21 Thread White Knight
On 2015-10-13 01:32, White Knight wrote: On 2015-10-10 02:47, Adrian Chadd wrote: I think it's worth upping to an int type, so we can eventually up it to > 64k. Please do submit diffs for revie.w :) I'll work on the patch this week, thank you. I have submitted a bug report,

Re: The kern.ipc.somaxconn limit revisited.

2015-10-12 Thread White Knight
On 2015-10-10 02:47, Adrian Chadd wrote: I think it's worth upping to an int type, so we can eventually up it to > 64k. Please do submit diffs for revie.w :) I'll work on the patch this week, thank you. -- White Knight I'm not from 2ch.net,

The kern.ipc.somaxconn limit revisited.

2015-10-09 Thread White Knight
tval is signed. optval = so->so_qlimit; Does that mean the fields in struct socket are better off as signed than unsigned integers? (*) https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-January/031003.html Thank you, -- White Knight I'm not from 2ch.