On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:52:27AM -0800, Galen Sampson wrote:
> Hello all,
[Note: I'm not sure that this should be in current@ rather than [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 1) Are the worlds daemons written to link against kerberos (as apposed to the
>heimdal replacements replacing their traditional coun
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 02:20:19PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 04-Nov-2003 Tillman Hodgson wrote:
> > It occurs to me that this is likely related to the new interrupt code.
> > that tends to imply that the fix is "wait a few days and re-cvsup", but
>
It occurs to me that this is likely related to the new interrupt code.
that tends to imply that the fix is "wait a few days and re-cvsup", but
I thought folks here would be interested in seeing Sparc64 feedback.
-T
--
[It] contains "vegetable stabilizer" which sounds ominous. How unstable
are v
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 05:11:02PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Sep 16), Andrew Lankford said:
> > I've tried various cvsup sites (normally cvsup2 or cvsup16 ) and
> > each site returns this message:
> >
> > Rejected by server: Access limit exceeded; try again later
> >
> > I'
