On a related topic... how do you tell which of your filesystems are mounted
UFS1 -vs- UFS2? 'mount -v' just says ufs.
-Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Ray Kohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Vitaly Markitantov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 6:
- Original Message -
From: "Terry Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So I upgrade, and I can't get back into the box from my SSH1
> client machine to reenable SSH1 services on the box. Genius!
> 8-) 8-).
Its somewhat less than genious not to look over any new config
files you've installed t
> Thus spake Lucky Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I therefore believe that the 5.0 release represents a perfect
> > opportunity to remove ssh1 fallback from the default distribution of
> > FreeBSD and hope the FreeBSD team will consider this change.
>
> Making SSH 2 the default is one thing. Remo
No update on the cpp0 error but I can get bind9 to stay running if I disable
threads in the Makefile... no more signal 6.
-Steve
> New datapoint:
>
> If I compile the kernel in the old fashion (config SB; cd ../compile/SB;
> make depend all install) then the kernel compiles and installs fine.
>
Edit line 92 of sql/mysqld.cc:
--#ifdef __linux__
++ #ifdef __FreeBSD__
However that'll only get you past this set of errors. And then it gets
tricky and has something to do with the new C++ compiler that I haven't
quite wrapped my mind around yet.
-Steve
- Original Message -
From
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:08:07 +0100
> Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > There is another common source of confusion: If anybody has IDE
> > > disks, write-caching is enabled by default in -stable, but disabled
> > > in -current.
> >
> > I don't think that is true anymore. -stable has W
*sigh* No suprise here. As 90% of these things are this was yet
another Dumb User Error. I had a base address conflict that kept
the card from being probed.
Thanks for everyone's help. As always FreeBSD is working just
great!
-Steve
To Unsubscrib
ll get lots and lots of messages...
>
>
> -Mark Taylor
> NetMAX Developer
> mtay...@cybernet.com
>
>
> On 18-May-99 Steven Ames wrote:
> >
> > Wow. I don't think that should ever happen but at this point I'll
> > try a lot of things :)
> >
&g
> > device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 net irq 10 iomem 0xd8000
>
> You should probably show the list what device lines you are using for
> current, since config barfs on the above line under current:
>
> config: line 52: `net' interrupt label obsolete
Fair enough:
device ed1 at isa? port 0x280 irq 1
Last night switched from 3.1 to 4.0. Smooth transition. The only
error I've seen is one of my ethernet cards is no longer detected.
In the previous kernel (3.1-STABLE) I had the following config
line:
device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 net irq 10 iomem 0xd8000
When the system booted it would detect
10 matches
Mail list logo
