3 of the cores have IDs below 256 and
the remaining 49 have IDs of 256 and above and FreeBSD is not using those
cores.
--
Steve O'Hara-Smith
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsu
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 04:43:27 -0500
Peter Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, since that fateful
> e-mail I have been viciously attacked by spammers posing as Microsoft
> security updaters. These spams include attachments making them all
> around 150KB in size. Maybe others of you ha
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 21:10:26 -0400 (EDT)
Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CR> On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Brian Reichert wrote:
CR>
CR> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 08:56:56PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
CR> > > On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Gregory Sutter wrote:
CR> > >
CR> > > To drag this back to more intere
On Sat, 5 Apr 2003 10:32:20 +0300
Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RE> On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 08:36:05AM +0200, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
RE> > On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:41:14 +0300
RE> > I've a feeling that there are a fair number of folks planning
RE&g
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:41:14 +0300
Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RE> Currently it is supported, but may not be soon. The
RE> issue was brought up with Technical Review Board who
RE> are currently in the process of voting on the supported
RE> upgrade path matrix (both native and cross a
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:37:55 -0600 (CST)
Charlie ROOT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CR>
CR>
CR> On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, David Wolfskill wrote:
CR>
CR> > See /usr/ports/x11/wrapper.
CR>
CR> I have wrapper installed
If you have updated your X server since installing wrapper
the link will be p
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 16:38:08 -0700
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TL> Only if you reserved a window for it. Say 1G of KVA, though last
I was thinking more like 1M, or even a few K, it sounds like that's
not possible.
TL> I checked the bank selection granularity wasn't fine en
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 06:04:34 -0700
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TL> FreeBSD doesn't currently support bank selection. Peter was
TL> working on it, last time I heard. Linux supports it, at an
TL> incredible performance penalty.
This inspired an off the wall thought that may
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 13:35:32 -0700
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
KK> wrapper always needs to be rebuilt when you update X, yes.
All you really need to do is reset the X symlink (unless you are
upgrading from 3 to 4 in which case you need a new wrapper).
--
C:>WIN
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002 06:11:10 -0500
"Gerald A. Speak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GAS> I was having the same problem until I un-installed automake and autoconf,
GAS> after which ghostscript-gnu installed just fine.
I've seen this a lot since automake 1.5 hit my system there seems to
be a
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001 17:04:01 -0500
Jim Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JB> I said I'd drop it, but apparently there are people that don't understand the
dinosaur mentality of certain organizations such as
JB> DOD, DISA/DECC, OSD, DARPA, USA, USN, USAF, and USMC.
JB>
JB> If it's not in the ba
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001 22:30:58 +1000 (EST)
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BE> cp always did this (except in the broken case of a broken symlink). POSIX
BE> just clarifies it. From the FreeBSD manpage for cp(1):
Ignore me, I think I must be going temporarily insane.
--
Direc
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001 17:27:00 +1000 (EST)
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BE> > This is correct behaviour IMHO - why on earth should it fail. If I
BE> > copy a directory containing symlinks I don't want them do vanish just because
BE> > the target is unavailable.
BE>
BE> Because cp copi
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001 14:34:07 +1000 (EST)
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BE> We are (or at least I am) talking about changing it to prevent links to a
BE> string that can _never_ be a valid pathname. Fortunately, in POSIX there
BE> is only one such string (the empty string).
Mayb
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 06:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DW> Indeed: it is my understanding that the "path name" interpretation is
DW> an issue at the time of reference, not (necessarily) the time of
DW> creation. It has, to the best of my knowledge, been valid to crea
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001 13:41:57 +0930
Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GL> When a request or question is sent to core@ you reply with an
Could you stick some numbers in here please. How much email does
core@ get ? What percentage of it (roughly) is handled immediately ?
Order of magn
On Mon, 7 May 2001 10:18:38 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Lets try another realistic example:
>
> cp -uvp ab* cde*.f* g? h/*.i? j/kl /m
> What's the find | cpio invocation for that? When you come up with it, it
echo ab* cde*.f* g? h/*.i? j/kl /m | cpio ...
Messy - No
On Tue, 1 May 2001 02:13:05 +0300
Tomi Vainio - Sun Finland - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TF> Please check http://www.geocities.com/wtnbkysh/ . It should work
I stand corrected - and impressed.
--
Optimal hardware acceleration for Windows PC (Mac).
9.81 m/s/s applied for (at least) 2
On Tue, 1 May 2001 00:53:33 +0930 (CST)
Benjamin Close <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BC> Hi All,
BC> Is anyone looking into converting the Linux winmodem driver (
I'm pretty certain not, although there was a post on USENET recently
by someone claiming to have their LT Winmodem running -
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MD> There is a whole lot more to doing an efficient copy then simply checking
MD> the mtime. It's silly to try to integrate it into 'cp'. Use cpdup
MD> instead. plug plug plug.
OK plug away -
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:13:38 +0100
Andrea Campi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AC> I was about to fill in a doc PR on this but then I thought I'm better off
AC> checking other people experiences...
A completely different question about growfs - is it fit for -stable ?
If so could it be MFC'd
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:22:43 +
Dermot McNally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DM> Nope, -STABLE is for production, -RELEASE is for installing immediately
Indeed, in fact there has been at least one release that was *not*
tagged for -STABLE (3.0).
--
Tell a computer to WIN - you lose!
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:31:32 -0500 (EST)
Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GW> I would rather have a single file, located in a directory intended for
GW> configuration files. Perhaps we could call it ``/etc/shells'' which
GW> seems to be popular.
As you wish. I have no axe to g
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:53:50 -0500
"Louis A. Mamakos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
LM> It doesn't seem unreasonable to have a single file with a list of allowable
LM> shells.
One thing - it is kind of cute having the allowable shells match
the mounted shells.
To Unsubscribe: send mail t
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 22:19:29 -0800 (PST)
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JB> People whine about the problem though, so having no solution doesn't
JB> help either. Since #include is syntatically a comment, it shouldn't
JB> mess up other programs, though the idea is that they will all use
Hi,
Asbestos suit on, round two.
The patch below changes getusershell to support a #include syntax
in /etc/shells. It is against RELENG_4 and may require a bit of fiddling
to apply to -current (because of nsdispatch()).
Everything that I can find is using it (wel
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 16:59:41 -0600
"Jacques A. Vidrine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JV> I thought you might add it as a different source, so that it need not be
JV> the default.
As I read it that is still a complementary possibility. The nsdispatch
stuff could move the start point from
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 13:17:22 -0600
"Jacques A. Vidrine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JV> You could just use the nsdispatch() API that is in -CURRENT, and that
JV> getusershell() uses.
I'm not sure what for, the changes I've made fit just as smoothly
into _local_initshells as they do into in
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 00:27:13 -0800 (PST)
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JB> How many contrib'd apps need to look at /etc/shells? The biggest one I think
JB> is sendmail, and Greg Shapiro is a very reasonable fellow, and can probably
JB> assist in getting sendmail at least to use the API
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 00:27:13 -0800 (PST)
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JB> How many contrib'd apps need to look at /etc/shells? The biggest one I think
JB> is sendmail, and Greg Shapiro is a very reasonable fellow, and can probably
JB> assist in getting sendmail at least to use the AP
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 14:13:42 -0800 (PST)
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JB> 1) All parsing of /etc/shells should move off into libutil under a
JB>suitable API.
There is one in libc/gen that would do fine. The catch is that it
is not used everywhere and some of the code that
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 16:21:01 -0500 (EST)
Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GW> <
said:
GW>
GW> > The patch below (against 4-stable but it will probably apply easily
GW> > to -current) moves /etc/shells to /usr/local/etc/shells.
GW>
GW> Bad idea. No base component (never mind libc!)
Hi,
Following some recent comments on the evil ways of ports have of
writing in /etc on install -
The patch below (against 4-stable but it will probably apply easily
to -current) moves /etc/shells to /usr/local/etc/shells. It should include
the removal of /usr/src/etc/she
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 10:13:16 -0400 (EDT)
Thomas David Rivers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Julian Elischer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm confused...
'fraid so. It is raw devices (for discs) that linux doesn't have,
they are all block devices - although I may be out of date it's bee
On 16-Aug-00 Donn Miller wrote:
> refused" message when I try to login to anonymous ftp sites. Should ftp
> be this dependent on /etc/services? What if you _have_ no services
> running, e.g. inetd & portmap? Returning ftp to port 21 in services fixes
I think the answer to this is 'yes
On 19-Jul-00 Peter Dufault wrote:
> Is the resolution of thermal sensors on many new motherboards and
> CPU high enough to get thermal randomness?
The voltage sensors have some noise too (maybe not enough).
--
Steve O'Hara-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://soh
On 17-Jul-00 Leif Neland wrote:
> If you can't reach a NTP server, you are not connected to the internet. In
> that case you don't need to worry so much about security...
Not clear. I might not be connected at boot time but could well become
connected later.
--
St
On 17-Jul-00 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> NTP is the perfect way to gather entropy at bootup!
Only if in reach of an NTP server ?
--
Steve O'Hara-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://sohara.webhop.net/ A Better Way To Focus The Sun
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [E
iser bug from
screwing things up.
--
Steve O'Hara-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://sohara.webhop.net/ A Better Way To Focus The Sun
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On 07-Jul-00 Doug Barton wrote:
> This is a known problem with all PCI sound cards. It happens most
> often with ECC ram, but it also happens without. What kind of NIC do you
> have, and specifically, is it a PCI card or ISA? We're trying to track
> that bit down too.
Could it b
On 19-Jun-00 Jacques A . Vidrine wrote:
> [trimmed cc: list, now including only -current]
>
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2000 at 11:54:51PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
>> Also speaking from my own experience I would have expected
>> something like this to be part of the system and would have
>> never eve
On 05-Jun-00 John Hengstler wrote:
> I don't know that what the actual modem is inside. The system is a Compaq
> Presario 1200.
I rather think that means Lucent windows only modem. It does in my 1690.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current"
On 18-Apr-00 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> It would be nice to have some kind of understanding why the tsc is
> better than the i8254 before we kludge it...
>
Unless I misread completely one nice side effect of this would be to
enable pcaudio on APM machines.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
On 17-Apr-00 Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> I'm not able to get X11 connection forwarding to work anymore.
Just a data point, it works fine in 4-stable (about a week old).
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Hi,
I know this little beasty isn't supported (yet) and I saw some comments
about it on the -multimedia archive. I am stuck with one and I would like to
make it work (at least as an SBPro emulation). I have enough docs on the card
to do that I think but I don't know what it takes
On 12-Feb-00 Alex Le Heux wrote:
> Check out www.mapblast.com. I think it will do what you want.
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 01:04:28AM +0100, Leif Neland wrote:
>> Sometime ago there was a thread regarding Longitude and Lattitude of
>> committers etc, and a reference was made to a website, wher
On 20-Jan-00 Satyajit Das wrote:
> please note, i wrote email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> and in body : subscribe freebsd-question
The list is called freebsd-questions not freebsd-question.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the b
On 18-Jan-00 Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
> Won't people get into legal trouble (technically) if they build the
> wrong version?
As far as I understand things specifying USA_RESIDENT=yes when it is
not true is liable (technically) to get some US based ftp server operator in
trou
On 17-Jan-00 Satyajit Das wrote:
> I like to use BASH shell in my user account. how can i do this ? please
> inform.
Install bash (either from ports or a package).
Use chsh to change the entry for Shell to /usr/local/bin/bash.
PS: This sort of question is better on -questions t
On 17-Jan-00 Satyajit Das wrote:
> hello
>
> I'm from bangladesh.
> I install FBSD 3.3 .
> FBSD shows 12 hours advanced from current time and also date.
> when i install i select Bangladesh .
> please inform how can i fix my current time and date.
Set your machine CMOS clock to GMT usin
On 06-Jan-00 Andreas Klemm wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 12:55:06PM +0100, Brad Knowles wrote:
>> More releases more often are better than indefinitely holding up
>> releases waiting for just that one last thing to be finished.
>
> Second that. And to follow on that...
> FreeBSD 4.0 wil
On 27-Dec-99 Emre wrote:
> Actually I haven't tried -release or -stable...I'm willing
> to take the chance.
I think you will find that you are taking much more of a chance with
-current than with -stable. After all -current is allowed to break sometimes,
-stable only does it by accident.
On 15-Dec-99 Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Alexander Langer wrote in list.freebsd-current:
> > gunzip has approx 106 kb, but you save about 50% per executeable.
>
> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4648 Jan 28 1999 /usr/bin/minigzip
It requires the 50Kb libz.so.2 though and some of libc.
---
On 13-Dec-99 Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 14 Dec 1999 00:34:28 +1030, Matthew Thyer wrote:
>
>> What is the big rush to 4.0-RELEASE ?
>
> We are relying on public awareness of the fact that .0 releases (in just
> about any project) are _going_ to have issues. We need the 4 branch out
>
On 25-Nov-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry, but my question must be - WHY there still is no
> ELF version of Netscape Communicator for FreeBSD ?
> (FreeBSD's point of view to this problem ?)
On 12-Aug-99 Ben Rosengart wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
>
>> What in the world would be the point of doing this? What would be so
>> great
>> about not seeing the system boot up?
>
> One might want minimal or no boot messages, just to look nice, while
> still wanting th
s to lock up if touched
between power on and resume finishing. The best indicator of safety is
apm -z returning, if I use the button I have to guess.
--
E-Mail: Steve O'Hara-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 10-Aug-99
Time: 16:29:54
This messag
On 07-Jul-99 Ladavac Marino wrote:
>> It does :) That said doesn't sysinstall using ppp to do a net
>> install?
>> How does it setup username/password, etc.
> [ML] It asks for it in a dialog box, IIRC (never having used it
>:)
sysinstall drops you into ppp and you have to use the
oblem. this bug doesn't appear with Microsoft
> and
> Hewlett-Packard mice.
If you are using moused then a killall -HUP moused can often
solve this sort of problem without a reboot.
--
E-Mail: Steve O'Hara-Smith
Da
On 27-Apr-99 m...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
> Steve O'Hara-Smith once wrote:
>
>> On 27-Apr-99 Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> There is no /lib on FreeBSD and none of the /bin/* (except for rmail)
> is
My typo for /lib read /usr/lib, however Warner has shown that
(at least
On 27-Apr-99 Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>> At a guess, it is there to ensure that when you boot single user,
>> and
>> have only /, you can still verify the integrety of other files...
>
> Why not to put it in /bin?
I had always understood that sbin meant static binaries (ie:
those that could
On 03-Feb-99 Reinier Bezuidenhout wrote:
> Hi ...
>
> There is no /usr/ports/Mk directory on my machine
> Where can I find these files or is it a bug ??
cvsup your ports and all will be well.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the
n throw away my aout
libraries which are being carried around only for netscape nowadays).
------
E-Mail: Steve O'Hara-Smith
Date: 27-Jan-99
Time: 17:03:48
This message was sent by XFMail
--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@free
63 matches
Mail list logo
