Re: What's changed relating to localhost then?

2003-11-22 Thread Steve Ames
I noticed the same thing yesterday when postgresql stopped working properly because there wasn't an entry for my public IP in the pg_hba.conf file. If you telnet to 127.0.0.1 the system still believes you are coming from your public IP. Bizarre that. Other IPs don't act that way. My system has tw

Re: panic related to in_output.c

2003-11-12 Thread Steve Ames
Bah. Certainly better. The machine was locking every 15-20 minutes. Now it reboots itself every couple of hours with the following: panic: lock (sleep mutex) tcp not locked @ /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_syncache.c 378 -Steve On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 04:20:20PM -0500, Steve Ames wrote: > That se

Re: panic related to in_output.c

2003-11-11 Thread Steve Ames
That seems to have done the job (v 1.48 of tcp_syncache.c). At least its been up for nearly an hour which is a definate positive! Thanks. -Steve - Original Message - From: "Sam Leffler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Steve Ames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; &

panic related to in_output.c

2003-11-11 Thread Steve Ames
Code from yesterday evening (11/10 around 5PM EST). Just updated this morning. I saw no updates to ip_output.c but there were changes to a couple of other files in sys/netinet so figured I'd give it a whirl... panic: mutex inp not owned at /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:218 cpuid= -; Debugger("

Re: LOR in route.c

2003-11-10 Thread Steve Ames
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 02:43:11PM -0800, Sam Leffler wrote: > On Monday 10 November 2003 02:27 pm, Steve Ames wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 05:19:06PM -0500, Steve Ames wrote: > > > New /usr/src from around 4:30PM EST: > > > > > > Mon Nov 10 17:16:1

Re: LOR in route.c

2003-11-10 Thread Steve Ames
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 05:19:06PM -0500, Steve Ames wrote: > > New /usr/src from around 4:30PM EST: > > Mon Nov 10 17:16:14 EST 2003 > lock order reversal > 1st 0xc6761890 rtentry (rtentry) @ /opt/src/sys/net/route.c:182 > 2nd 0xc668687c radix node head (radix node hea

LOR in route.c

2003-11-10 Thread Steve Ames
New /usr/src from around 4:30PM EST: Mon Nov 10 17:16:14 EST 2003 lock order reversal 1st 0xc6761890 rtentry (rtentry) @ /opt/src/sys/net/route.c:182 2nd 0xc668687c radix node head (radix node head) @ /opt/src/sys/net/route.c:565 Stack backtrace: -Steve __

Kernel Panic

2003-11-04 Thread Steve Ames
For the past few weeks my -CURRENT system has been locking up. With a recent kernel (from 11/2) the following appears: Fault trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x24 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc049d0db stack pointer

Re: boot hang: "ata1: resetting devices .. done" (5.1-CURRENT, IBMT30)

2003-10-12 Thread Steve Ames
> > > Backing out the most recent checkin to sys/dev/ata/ata-queue.c (i.e. > > > reverting to version 1.6) makes the problem go away. > > > > I upgraded from an Oct 1 -> Oct 12 kernel and saw the same hang. > > Backing out r1.6 fixed it for me too. > > > "me too" Anyone tried going forward to 1.8?

New SATA Hardware

2003-10-01 Thread Steve Ames
G'day. My company is putting together a system with lots of file system on it to do disk based backup. Under 5.1-CURRENT what's the best supported (and performing optimally) SATA RAID controller (RAID 0, maybe 5)? What manufacturer/model of SATA disks do you recommend for that controller? Thi

Resolved: ATAng problems

2003-09-19 Thread Steve Ames
With the latest updates from Soren my server was always finding the master drive but not the slave. This morning I decided to move the slave drive to secondary master and see if that worked. As I was doing that I noticed the slave was jumpered as "Cable Select". I've never had good luck with CS an

Re: ATAng still problematic

2003-09-18 Thread Steve Ames
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:00:56AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > > Anyone know how to make the message buffer larger? I don't have > > a serial console hooked up currently and a boot verbose is way > > over the 32K default buffer size so only get the last 32K once > > the system is booted up. > > >Fr

Re: ATAng still problematic

2003-09-18 Thread Steve Ames
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 06:55:07PM +0200, Jan Srzednicki wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:46:35AM -0500, Steve Ames wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 06:38:25PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: > > > Anyhow, what I need to be able to tell what may be going on, is that > > &g

Re: ATAng still problematic

2003-09-18 Thread Steve Ames
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 06:38:25PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: > Anyhow, what I need to be able to tell what may be going on, is that > you boot verbose and get me the output from dmesg from a boot that > found all device, and from a boot that missed. Anyone know how to make the message buffer lar

More ATAng probing issues

2003-09-12 Thread Steve Ames
sos, I had the misfortune of swapping motherboards recently to an Asus MB with a nVidia controller. Suddenly my drives don't show up on any recent kernels. They do on a 8/28 kernel. in ata-lowleve.c I switched the '#if 0' to an '#if 1' and rebooted and now my ad0 (primary controller master drive)

new MB = ACPI Errors?

2003-09-08 Thread Steve Ames
Hey. I installed a new motherboard today and now I get a lot of ACPI errors (with a kernel from today and one from a few days back). This anything to worry about? -Steve Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/acpi.ko" at 0xc046a248. acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: power button is handled as a fixed fe

Re: TESTERS WANTED for ATAng preview 2

2003-08-18 Thread Steve Ames
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 05:28:48PM -0700, Jason Stone wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > Grap the latest from ftp.deepcore.dk/pub/ATAng and apply the diff files > > > to your src tree, remove the contents of sys/dev/ata and extract the > > > ATAng-*tgz file there,

ports/news/newscache gives sig11 on recent -CURRENT

2003-08-01 Thread Steve Ames
ports/news/newscache now gives me a sig11. It didn't a few weeks ago but I really can't pin it down any closer than that. I thought it may have been related to the new gcc import but I'm not able to check that. After it gave me the sig11 I recompiled it and its dependancies and that didn't fix any

Re: RELENG_5_1 doesnt build gifconfig

2003-07-12 Thread Steve Ames
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 06:16:48PM +0200, Karl M. Joch wrote: > i have a 5.1 box running which is in production because the need of vmware3. > > wanted to setup some ipsec tunnels and miss gifconfig. it is still in > the source tree, but doesnt build with buildworld. cleaned out src and > obj an

Can't compile today's (3/7) kernel

2003-03-07 Thread Steve Ames
I'm getting this error when trying to compile kernels for the last few days: cc -c -O -pipe -march=athlon -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-p rototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-e xtensions -ansi -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/us

Re: today's 5-current hang hard when building apache2 port

2003-02-21 Thread Steve Ames
I experienced this problem also. Also could not buildworld or buildkernel (caused a reboot). I reverted to a 2/16 kernel and the problems went away. Haven't had time to narrow it down further than that. - Original Message - From: "Shizuka Kudo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> S

recent rc.d/network1 commit breaks lo0 interface

2002-12-12 Thread Steve Ames
after the introduction of the changes in v 1.143 of etc/rc.d/network1 my lo0 interface no longer gets an IP address assigned to it. Backing out these changes fixes issues quite handily but is probably not appropriate to all situations. -Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Steve Ames
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:14:55PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > This still changes a machine that works into a machine that doesn't > work. How is that an "upgrade"? I've no doubt some informed, good intentioned persons said the same thing when telnetd was no longer enabled by default. *shrug* T

Re: can't compile kernel?

2002-09-18 Thread Steve Ames
and mysql-server are still exiting on signal6. -Steve On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 11:07:36AM -0500, Steve Ames wrote: > > This started yesterday after an upgrade to a recent -CURRENT (prior > version was perhaps 4 days old). Some programs (specifically bind9 > and mysql-server) startin

can't compile kernel?

2002-09-18 Thread Steve Ames
This started yesterday after an upgrade to a recent -CURRENT (prior version was perhaps 4 days old). Some programs (specifically bind9 and mysql-server) starting aborting with a sig6. Figuring maybe I just caught an update in the middle or some such I updated the source again and rebuilt world.

Re: lukemftpd not logging wtmp?

2002-08-28 Thread Steve Ames
Bah. I spoke to quickly. It looks like PR bin/41556 partially addresses this. So it is a known problem. I'll apply the patch listed in the PR. Sorry to bother. -Steve On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:57:53PM -0500, Steve Ames wrote: > > -w (log sessions to wtmp) is theoretically

lukemftpd not logging wtmp?

2002-08-28 Thread Steve Ames
-w (log sessions to wtmp) is theoretically the default (according to the man page), however FTP sessions never get logged to the wtmp file (or utmp file if '-u' is specified). I searched the mailing list archives but didn't see anything. Before I peak at the code I wanted to see if this was kno

[patch] Re: inetd parsing broke for non IPv6 configurations

2002-07-18 Thread Steve Ames
Jul 17, 2002 at 02:36:46PM -0500, Steve Ames wrote: > > This worked 3 days ago but I just upgraded to -CURRENT from today > and its not quite working now. If you have tcp6 lines in your > inetd.conf but do not have IPv6 enabled in the kernel your inetd > will stop adding services a

inetd parsing broke for non IPv6 configurations

2002-07-17 Thread Steve Ames
This worked 3 days ago but I just upgraded to -CURRENT from today and its not quite working now. If you have tcp6 lines in your inetd.conf but do not have IPv6 enabled in the kernel your inetd will stop adding services after it encounters the first line with a tcp6 in it: mysystem# inetd -d ADD

Re: Crash after world/kernel upgrade

2002-06-11 Thread Steve Ames
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 10:51:25PM +0530, Sid Carter wrote: > An Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 04:58:39PM +0200, Thomas Ugland schreib : > > System crashed after updating today. > > During the start of system services, in specific > > at the start of sendmail the system crashes with > > the new kernel. :/

Re: Performance of -current vs -stable

2002-02-06 Thread Steve Ames
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:02:34AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 06-Feb-02 Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > Could it be due to the DDB, INVARIANTS & WITNESS options in the > > kernel? If it is that's fine with me, I'm just wondering where > > that magnitude of a slowdown would be coming from. >

Re: DEVFS newbie...

2001-01-29 Thread Steve Ames
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 10:19:34PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 29-Jan-01 John Indra wrote: > > 2. If something change to the source tree's MAKEDEV, what should I do? > > Nothing. With DEVFS, each driver in the kernel creates its own > entries automatically, so MAKEDEV isn't used. Hrm...

Re: -current kernel hangs machine solid ...

2000-12-06 Thread Steve Ames
Actually... I just noticed that my hanging machine had been up for 5 days. I started it doing 'make -j8 world' in a continual loop a couple hours ago before leaving work... I'll see tomorrow. -Steve On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 05:37:14PM -0600, Michael Harnois wrote: > Just checking in ... I haven't

Re: sockstat causing OS lockups

2000-10-19 Thread Steve Ames
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:36:48AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Steve Ames <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 06:15:23PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > > On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Steve Ames wrote: > > > I'm running -CURRENT from

Re: sockstat causing OS lockups

2000-10-19 Thread Steve Ames
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 06:15:23PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote: > On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Steve Ames wrote: > > admin# sockstat | grep -v '*.*' > > close(fstat): > > > > The OS locked up after that. > > I'm running -CURRENT from approximatel

sockstat causing OS lockups

2000-10-19 Thread Steve Ames
admin# sockstat | grep -v '*.*' close(fstat): The OS locked up after that. That's just not normal :) Could someone give me the quick and dirty on how I can provide additional details? This is on -CURRENT from 10/16. The hardware is: Dual P3-500Mhz, 512M RAM. The kernel file is: machine

fwd: [root: security check]

2000-09-09 Thread Steve Ames
> virtual-voodoo.com changes in mounted filesystems: > 6d5 > < /dev/ad1s1g /source ufs rw 0 2 > 8a8 > > /dev/ad1s1g /source ufs rw 0 2 Got this is this morning's security check. This doesn't really show a change. The actual change was from normal to soft-updates. Any way this can show what act

microuptime() went backwards

2000-09-07 Thread Steve Ames
Just upgraded to -CURRENT as of about noon (EST) today. At reboot I got a lot of these: microuptime() went backwards (1.7682417 -> 1.997434) I recall reading in -current earlier this week that someone was looking for victims getting this. What further information can I provide? -Steve To Uns

Re: Problems with MAKEDEV.

2000-04-14 Thread Steve Ames
On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 08:58:29PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2000-Apr-14 20:43:12 +1000, Ashley Penney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It seems that the MAKEDEV script only > >makes up to ad3, but my disks are on ad4/ad5 (ATA-66, Abit BP6). > > "MAKEDEV all" is designed to create a generic

Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th

2000-01-06 Thread Steve Ames
> We are not going to repeat the 3.0 mess. IPV6 and IPSEC are important, > but not important enough to delay the already-delayed 4.0 release. 4.1 > is not too late for these babies. True... 4.1 is not too late. However a good part of IPv6 and IPSEC are already present and the prim

Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th

2000-01-06 Thread Steve Ames
> More releases more often are better than indefinitely holding up > releases waiting for just that one last thing to be finished. I think a recent thread on -STABLE indicates that the majority of end users seem to believe that -RELEASE means STABLE and should be fully operational not a wi

Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th

2000-01-06 Thread Steve Ames
> I agree. Why rush 4.0-RELEASE out the door if it's "not there yet"? One > possibility is to make our 4.0-current something like 3.9-RELEASE, and > when everything has been added, release 4.0-RELEASE. 3.9-RELEASE would be > a lot like 4.0-REL, only with some missing parts (such as IPV6 you jus

Re: strfile -C

1999-11-28 Thread Steve Ames
-0500, Steve Ames wrote: > -current as of about 3 hours ago. > > vv# strfile -C > strfile: illegal option -- C > strfile: [iorsx] [-c char] sourcefile [datafile] > > Not a biggie from my standpoint but the man page says that there > is a '-C' option and, more imp

strfile -C

1999-11-28 Thread Steve Ames
-current as of about 3 hours ago. vv# strfile -C strfile: illegal option -- C strfile: [iorsx] [-c char] sourcefile [datafile] Not a biggie from my standpoint but the man page says that there is a '-C' option and, more importantly, its used in /usr/src/games/fortune/datfiles -Steve To Unsubs