Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2011-12-15 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
15.12.2011 17:36, Michael Larabel пишет: On 12/15/2011 07:25 AM, Stefan Esser wrote: Am 15.12.2011 11:10, schrieb Michael Larabel: No, the same hardware was used for each OS. In terms of the software, the stock software stack for each OS was used. Just curious: Why did you choose ZFS on FreeB

Re: Panic after upgrade 7.2 -> 7.3

2010-06-02 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
02.06.2010 01:56, Bjoern A. Zeeb пишет: On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: Hi. Just after upgrade from 7.2-p5 to 7.3-p1 I've got periodic panics on my router (after about a hour uptime). ... Any ideas? Are you using IPsec?

Panic after upgrade 7.2 -> 7.3

2010-06-01 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Hi. Just after upgrade from 7.2-p5 to 7.3-p1 I've got periodic panics on my router (after about a hour uptime). Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 2; apic id = 06 fault virtual address = 0xc fault code = supervis

pthread_mutex_lock crashed

2003-11-01 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Hello! I've tested MICO port (CORBA implementation) both on -stable and -current. I use lang/gcc33 port for -stable. On -stable all goes right, but on -current one example crashed in pthread_mutex_lock(). Here is gdb back tracing: #0 0x280830c9 in _atomic_lock () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.5 #1

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-10-30 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Richard Nyberg wrote: >Doug White wrote: > > yes, this is a change to -current. It is for your own safety. > I think this change in current is for the worse. I don't see why I can't manage slices and partitions from my regular OS, but have to boot up a CD to do the job. It's not even safer; I am pe

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-10-29 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Doug White wrote: "Missing operating system" comes out of the DOS default bootblock, not the BIOS. Yes, I know. But I don't feel better then. Don't use chainloader with FreeBSD. Use 'kernel /boot/loader' instead. This is documented in the GRUB info doc. Again, I have set this exact system up with

problems with sysinstall

2003-10-28 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
The first one: when I install -current on disk where WinXP on first slice, sysinstall brakes WinXP boot complete. I got 'Missing operation system' everytime. Even I've tried 'fixboot' and reinstall WinXP. Helps only 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad0 count=100' and reinstall WinXP on clean disk. When

Re: Initial list of ports that fail due to -pthread

2003-09-24 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Kris Kennaway wrote: Here is a partial list of the ports that need to be taught to respect PTHREAD_LIBS and PTHREAD_CFLAGS, from the latest 5.x package build (I [skipped] omniORB-4.0.2 PR/56862 is waiting for ports unfreezing. -- Sem. ___ [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: -current brake ufs for -stable

2003-09-21 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Bruce Evans wrote: -current doesn't write extended attributes unless you enabled them. OK. I'm wrong. Really I don't understand a problem. Superblock was corrupted. I've fix it with fsck (from other sector). But I decided remake the FS and run newfs from -stable again. Now I write on it buth -s

-current brake ufs for -stable

2003-09-21 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Hello! I've installed both -current and -stable on my box. One of partition I plan to share betwen them (place ports/distfiles there). I newfs'ed it from -stable and wrote on it from -current. When I booted with -stable I've found the partition FS was broken. I think it's because of extended atr

Re: gcc 3.3.1

2003-07-12 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 06:08:57 +0400 Sergey Matveychuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Don't forget bump __FreeBSD_version. :) What for? Bumped __FreeBSD_cc_version is enough. The ports system use it. How can we check is gcc changed? !defined(OSVERSION) .if exists(/

gcc 3.3.1

2003-07-11 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Don't forget bump __FreeBSD_version. :) Sem. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

5.1 and nawk

2003-06-06 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Tonight I'v installed a devel/newfile. When it's build it run nawk. In that time my computer was a very slow reaction without disk operation. When I'v runned top command I'v seen: -- last pid: 38039; load averages: 1.58, 1.80, 1.73up 0+01:21:08 05:22:28 53 processes: 3 running, 50 s

slow console input

2003-06-05 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Hello! When I'v upgraded from 4.x to 5.x and I'v noticed more slow console input. Will it be so? Or can I faster it? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PRO

Flushing CD-ROM?

2003-06-05 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Why 5.1 flush acd0 on shutdown? - syncing disk, buffers remaining... done Uptime ... acd0: timeout waiting for cmd=e7 s=01 e=04 acd0: flushing device failed The operating system has halted. - Well, it's cd-writer really, but there is no disk there any way.

Re: ACPI

2003-02-23 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
> MODULES_WITH_WORLD causes modules to be installed during installworld. > But when you later do installkernel, it renames /boot/kernel to > /boot/kernel.old, so all your modules end up there. Don't use > MODULES_WITH_WORLD, or use ``make reinstallkernel'' which is safe > for MODULES_WITH_WORLD en

Re: ACPI

2003-02-23 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
> That's saying the acpi.ko module was not built and installed. > > When you install your new kernel, use the Makefile target, instead > of using "cp", or it won't install the modules it builds. > > If you did this, then check your make.conf to see if you are > specifically telling it to not build

ACPI

2003-02-22 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
I'v cvsup'ed from 5.0-RELEASE to RELENG_5_0_0 last night and ACPI doesn't work now. When booting I'v got a message: "ACPI autoload failed - no such file or directory". How to fix? Sem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the mes