On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rick Macklem wrote:
Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it up.
1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved
problems with the new one? (I am not aware of any outstanding
issues in the new nfs that don't exist in the oldnfs.)
2 -
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Since initial mail
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-October/045911.html
did not raise a lot of objection, I'm going to proceed with this.
Ditto here -- on the one hand, a shame, and on the other, reality. Remember
to also gar
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014, Xin Li wrote:
I have recently upgraded my home storage box (Avoton based board running
FreeBSD/amd64) from 10.0-RELEASE (patched with some ZFS changes) to
-CURRENT. It looks like the system would easily hang when I start
'buildworld', when this happens, I saw sh process s
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 24.08.2013 00:54, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I'd like to commit this to -10. It migrates the if_lagg locking
from a rw lock to a rm lock. We see a bit of contention between the
transmit and
We're running lagg with rmlock on several hundred heavi
On Sun, 2 Dec 2012, O. Hartmann wrote:
Does mergemaster -p help?
I had the very same problem and complained about it on current@.
"mergemaster -p" definitely helped for me and I was given the advise to use
mergemaster -p prior to every make installworld.
Just to follow up on this thread,
ed message --
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 15:11:46 + (UTC)
From: Robert Watson
To: src-committ...@freebsd.org, svn-src-...@freebsd.org,
svn-src-h...@freebsd.org
Subject: svn commit: r243752 - in head: etc etc/defaults etc/mail etc/mtree
etc/rc.d share/man/man4 usr.sbin usr.sbin/
Panics along these lines often occur if there is a concurrency bug in a device
driver such that it modifies an mbuf after dispatching to the network stack.
E.g., by freeing it, reusing it, an errant dereference, etc. Not guaranteed,
but that is where I'd start.
Robert
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Ad
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Ian Lepore wrote:
To be clear, I'm not objecting to your proposed changes, I'm more just
musing that similar problems exist in non-x86 architectures and maybe an MI
solution is possible (or at least the groundwork could be laid)?
I was likewise going to comment that ther
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Chris Rees wrote:
as well as we don't depend of /proc for normal operation we shouldn't for
say /proc/sysctl
improvements are welcome, better documentation is welcome, changes to
what is OK - isn't.
/proc/sysctl might be useful. Just because Linux uses it doesn't make
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote:
Last few weeks I've been working on DTrace port for MIPS architecture. I
believe that project reached the stage when it's ready for public
review/testing before going into the tree.
Patch and some information could be found here:
http://people.
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Attilio Rao wrote:
As we are here, however, I have a question for Robert here: do you think we
should support the _ddb() variant of options even in the case DDB is not
enabled in the kernel?
It's possible that _ddb() should be spelled _unlocked(), or perhaps _debug(),
bu
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011, Attilio Rao wrote:
With the aid of kib and rwatson I made a roughly outlined plan about what is
left to do in order to have all the filesystems locked (or eventually
dropped) before 10.0) and is summarized here:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT_VFS
Here's a mor
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011, Alexander Best wrote:
has anybody seen this buildworld failure?
Could you try the attached patch and see if it helps? I currently have it in
the re@ approval queue. It does appear to fix the problem here.
Generally, I would strongly advise against using modules built
Dear all:
As you may have seen from current@ traffic, a bug crept in during the Capsicum
merge, introduced by the infamous Last Minute Cleanup and not caught in
pre-commit testing. The most noticed effect of the bug is to cause buildworld
to fail due to a problem with /dev/{stdin,stdout,stde
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Kip Macy wrote:
The module makefile needs to be updated evidently. Just add it to the
dependencies until rwatson gets around to fixing it.
Building modules with world is pretty uncommon (I assume that's what is going
on here -- MODULES_WITH_WORLD), so it looks like we mis
I'm guessing this relates to nroff/groff tweaks, but I was a bit unhappy to
learn that the command I've used for the last decade to render man pages while
editing them (nroff -mandoc foo.1 | more) no longer works (output below).
It seems likely this has to do with teaching groff to use ANSI e
On Tue, 24 May 2011, Robert Watson wrote:
Over the next few days, I will be merging a number of TCP-related locking
changes, as well as changes to various network stack infrastructure bits,
such as the netisr implementation. The goal, generally, has been to move us
in the direction of
Dear all:
Over the next few days, I will be merging a number of TCP-related locking
changes, as well as changes to various network stack infrastructure bits, such
as the netisr implementation. The goal, generally, has been to move us in the
direction of supporting more clear CPU affinity for
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011, Robert Watson wrote:
Jon and my current plan is to merge, over the next few months, various
kernel features required to support Capscium sandboxing for FreeBSD 9.0:
first capability mode support (this week), then capabilities themselves
(which are a form of file
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, Shawn Webb wrote:
Hey fellow current users,
Looks like dtrace is broken in current:
# dtrace -l -f acl dtrace: invalid probe specifier acl:
"/usr/lib/dtrace/psinfo.d", line 37: syntax error near "uid_t"
Error messages along these lines almost always mean that the kernel
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/3/11 10:08 AM, David Somayajulu wrote:
Hi All, While sending the Received Ethernet Frames (non - LRO case) to the
FreeBSD Network Stack via (struct ifnet *)->if_input((struct ifnet *),
(struct *mbuf));
Is it possible to send multiple Ethernet
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, William Allen Simpson wrote:
Who's the kernel expert on TCP around here? ISC wants me to port TCPCT to
FreeBSD. Although I've joined this list (some time ago), I've not seen any
traffic discussing TCP'ish things. Need somebody willing to walk me through
the processes a
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I think Tinderbox has a bad source tree. Lines 557 and 569 make sense from
the old version of kern_fail.c before either of my commits. So is
Tinderbox somehow building with an old kern_fail.c but an updated
sys/fail.h? That would explain the build er
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Isn't there also DEADLKRES that might be helpful in this case (if
Alex is really dealing with a livelock in the kernel)...?
The deadlock resolver is compiled into the GENERIC kernel on -CURRENT, so I'm
assuming it hasn't helped (or perhaps is eve
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Alexander Best wrote:
i tried detaching and attaching my keyboard after chromium crashed my
system and the lights of the keyboard didn't even went on. so in fact
everything crashed and not just X.
If I said it unclear, let me repeat, the usermode crash dump you got
probab
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Rui Paulo wrote:
you think adding pgsql to wheel might help? cc freebsd-security@ and see
their opinion about the topic.
dof needs to inject the probes in /dev/dtrace/helper, so the user needs rw
access to the /dev/dtrace/helper. I specifically added write access to the
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Attilio Rao wrote:
No, what I'm saying is: UMA needs to not call its drain handlers, and
ideally not call into VM to fill slabs, from the dumping context. That's
easy to implement and will cause the dump to fail rather than causing the
system to hang.
My point is, howeve
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Attilio Rao wrote:
GENERAL FRAMEWORK ARCHITECTURE
Netdump is composed, right now, by an userland "server" and a kernel
"client". The former is run on the target machine (where the dump will
phisically happen) and it is responsible for receiving the packets
containing cor
ern.smp.maxcpus.
Agreed. I'm fairly preoccupied currently, but would be happy to accept
patches :-).
Robert
- Joshua
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, John Baldwin wrote:
Also, I think we should either fix MAXCPU to export the SMP value to
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, John Baldwin wrote:
Also, I think we should either fix MAXCPU to export the SMP value to
userland, or hide it from userland completely. Exporting the UP value is
Just Wrong (tm).
Well, it's useful in the sense that it tells you what the maximum number of
CPUs a kernel
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Sean Bruno wrote:
wouldn't it be better to do a sysctlbyname() and use the real value for the
system?
libmemstat contains some useful sample code showing how this might be done.
That was my initial thought (as prodded by scottl and peter).
If it is made dynamic, could
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Scott Long wrote:
There's no reason not to include . I'm a little reluctant to
have it depend on the static MAXCPU definition, though. What happens when
you mix-and match userland and kernel and they no longer agree on the
definition of MAXCPU? I suggest creating a sys
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Artemiev Igor wrote:
What is the status for software flowid calculation? I found the old netisr2
patch[1] from Robert Watson and took from there code for setting flowid in
tcp_input with some changes[2]. It work for me very well (8.1-stable) - now
the server can handle
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
On 9/22/2010 6:37 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
Unfortunately this can't be MFC'd to 7 as it would destroy the ABI for
existing klds.
Ah, ok, sorry, I did only check RELENG_7. Can we make it a kernel option
then?
In principle, yes, but MAXCPU is used to
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
I would like to ask for feedback on a kernel level stacked cryptographic
filesystem. It has started as Summer Of Code'2009 project and matured a lot
since then. I've recently added support for sparse files and switched to XTS
encryption mode.
I've been
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, jhell wrote:
After r210693, these utilities are built for i386 and amd64 only. Thereby
you have stale binaries installed from older sources.
Lol this is the first I have read about this & comes as quite the surprise
that its not being built on top of the platform/arch that
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:15:26AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
Brooks Davis writes:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/201005ToolchainSummitSummary
"No new functionality that requires clang/llvm."
How about "No new functionality with non-trivial incompa
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, John Baldwin wrote:
MNT_* flags need to be deprecated, and the attributes passed in both
directions as key-value pairs. I don't know if anyone else has thought
about this and what it means for backwards compatibility.
My understanding of nmount() is that that is what it
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
I personally would much rather have the glue in place to switch between
compilers and have things default to the base version of gcc than just
magically switch the compiler over to clang.
But I like my bikesheds painted gray.
Calling that a bikeshe
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Scott Long wrote:
On May 31, 2010, at 3:56 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
My personal opinion is that pushing the import now at the present state of
clang makes a disservice to FreeBSD, and possible clang. Why not keep the
glue on the branch as it is ? Motivated testers wil
rob...@cinnamon-freebsd:~/freebsd/svncommit/base/projects/capabilities8> svn
update
At revision 208660.
load: 0.13 cmd: svn 5129 [select] -1.66r 0.00u 0.00s 0% 22504k
Annoying enough that svn is hanging indefinitely here, but the negative
runtime makes it worse :-). The process is alive, ju
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, M. Warner Losh wrote:
I've read most of this thread. I think this is cool technology. However,
before we move forward with this, we need to have a plan for the various
issues that have come up. The plan needs to be specific, have owners for
key items, warnings about own
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Robert Watson wrote:
In file included from /src/sys/fs/coda/coda_fbsd.c:49:
/src/sys/fs/coda/cnode.h:97: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
before 'CodaFid' /src/sys/fs/coda/cnode.h:199: error: expected ')' before
'*' token
Sorry all
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -nostdinc
-I. -I/src/sys -I/src
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
The result of the RFC was that bind is not a mandatory component to make "a
usable system", so you argument suffers from bad logic.
With an eye on the date of Doug's suggestive e-mail, I actually am concerned
that we maintain support for DNSSEC va
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
from r206082 on: $Subject
Make sure to read UPDATING (short: make sure there is no WITH_CTF in
src.conf or make.conf).
Once any fallout from this has sorted itself out, assuming no serious
objections, and pending appropriate make universe foo,
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Xin LI wrote:
A MFC of this update is planned, but we will have to make some rather
aggressive changes against the library and more testing.
Please make sure that you have at least libxml2-2.7.6_2 in your ports tree
before even thinking about updating your ports tree. Ol
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Doug Hardie wrote:
I run a number of 4 core systems with em interfaces. These are production
systems that are unmanned and located a long way from me. Under unusual
conditions it can take up to 6 hours to get there. I have been waiting to
switch to 8.0 because of the di
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, Robert Watson wrote:
If your system shows a non-zero value, please send me a *private e-mail*
with the output of that command, plus also the output of "sysctl kern.smp",
"uptime", and a brief description of the workload and network interface
configu
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, David O'Brien wrote:
No, not it isn't. Provide a script to convert path's in the diff. This is
what $LARGE_FREEBSD_USER did when it rearranged it source tree.
It was done by creating a copy of the CVS repo and moved files around. Old
releases stayed in the old repo, and
Dear all:
I'm embarking on some new network stack locking work, which requires me to
address a number of loose ends in the current model. A few years ago, my
attention was drawn to a largly theoretical race, which had existed in the BSD
code since inception. It is detected and handled in pr
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
thus, it is not 'Free', this managed by 'consumers like Isilon, NetApp,
Juniper, and many others'?
It might be helpful to think of them as 'customers' who are using our
'product' and paying for it by feeding back patches and employing FreeBSD
developers.
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message , Robert
Watso n writes:
[...] it's that changes in layout come with a less visible but much larger
cost than "svn mv".
Really stupid question: Doesn't svn support symlinks ?
Yes, but does that help? The issue is not user applicati
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
On 05.03.2010 12:17, Robert Watson wrote:
consumers like Isilon, NetApp, Juniper, and many others
thus, it is not 'Free', this managed by 'consumers like Isilon, NetApp,
Juniper, and many others'?
These and other companies contrib
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message , Robert
Watso n writes:
Doing that kind of rearrangement [...] would be a nightmare for anyone with
large [...] patches, so I'd say we could pretty much rule that out
outright.
I would say that we should do it occasionally, to encou
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, paradox wrote:
so, I really do not understand why it is so difficult to move a few folders
in the shared folder is a big problem as is done in openbsd and netbsd
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/arch/?only_with_tag=MAIN
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Xin LI wrote:
One good thing (in my opinion) that NetBSD and Darwin have is that they have
a "common" tree which holds the common files that shared between kernel and
userland libc. Currently we have 2 or more copies of certain files in the
tree but I'm not sure if it's a
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
===> usr.bin/systat (all)
cc -O -pipe -DINET6 -std=gnu99 -Wno-pointer-sign -c /src/usr.bin/systat/cmds.c
cc -O -pipe -DINET6 -std=gnu99 -Wno-pointer-sign -c
/src/usr.bin/systat/cmdtab.c
In file included from /src/usr.bin/systat/extern.h:39,
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Giovanni Trematerra wrote:
Try to boot with GENERIC kernel.
I think this is no problem because SMP is already turned on in GENERIC
kernel.
yes, my fault, I copied the kernel config file from my other UP box. All is
well now.
In fact, my fault. I had a bug in three a
Ran into this on a box with -CURRENT from yesterday, running with MAC
(although in this case I suspect it doesn't make a difference, I'm not
using the multilabel/extattr code in UFS2). I have a core on disk, so
please let me know what further information would be useful. This machine
spends a lo
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Ganbaa wrote:
> I'm trying to install FreeBSD-5.1 on the PC with PIII,512MB SDRAM, 30GB
> Barracuda II Model ST330630A. But following error has occured.
We're in the throes of preparing FreeBSD 5.2 for release, which includes a
large number of bug fixes (although potentially
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> At Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:23:21 -0500 (EST),
> Robert Watson wrote:
> > This could be a sign of a VM or VFS lock leak or deadlock. I'd advise
> > hooking up a serial console, dropping to DDB over serial line, and posting
> >
Running with a MAC kernel, about to try booting identical but non-MAC; I'm
not able to reproduceit , however. bgfsck may have been running during
the shutdown. Apparently the device vnode for /usr is vrele()'d one too
many times at some point during the run, resulting in a panic. This is
with v
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> "Jacques A. Vidrine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > By `the two', do you mean directory services and authentication? They
> > are certainly not `essentially one'. But I suspect you know this and
> > I am just misunderstanding your meaning.
>
> T
| while waiting on |
|| || a lock. Fixing |
|| || this requires|
| rpc.lockd(8) | In progress | Robert Watson | that the RPC |
| stability | |
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> I got lockups in recent -current box. This box is my main workstation
> and usually be up to date kernel.
>
> In recent days, I usually locked up. This is not a panic, only locks
> up. My situation is:
>
> o KDE's clock is working.
> o KDE's virtua
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Richard Coleman wrote:
> > (2) Reevaluate the order at routine points in the boot where new scripts
> > might now be available (due to file system mounts or whatever).
> > Essentially "insert the new cards into the deck, and shuffle". This
> > requires rethinking
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Maxim M. Kazachek wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Richard Coleman wrote:
For 5.2-RELEASE, I think we should ignore the whole issue and let the
couple of ports that insert things in /etc/rc.d "just do it". We're not
going to find any other solution in time to either close the
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Colin Percival wrote:
>
> >Robert Watson suggested that I compare performance from UP and SMP kernels:
> >
> > # /usr/bin/time -hl sh -c 'make -s buildworld 2>&1' > /dev/nu
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 09:43, HaggeL wrote:
> > Hi Guys :)
> >
> > Sorry if i waste your time. I®m a freeBSD noob and need some help.
> > I want to install freeBSD in januar and have some problems. I want to
> > buy me a new harddrive, a serial ATA
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Andreas Klemm wrote:
> I have a better idea, then we perhaps need something like a wrapper
> script that is part of the FreeBSD basic system under /etc/rc.d that
> checks for the start script under $LOCALBASE/etc/rc.d and starts it very
> early.
Hmm. I talked with Gordon a
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Colin Percival wrote:
>I've got a system running 5.2-BETA from 27/11/03, with the
> malloc_abort, malloc_junk, DEBUG=-g, DDB, INVARIANT*, and WITNESS*
> debugging options changed (as was done in 5.1-RELEASE).
>When running `make buildworld`, I see large amounts of sy
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Kent Stewart wrote:
> This kind of error frequently happens when your clock is off. Make
> thinks the date of the cvsuped source is newer than the file it created
> and tries to create it again.
>
> Do you run cmos at UTC or local. If local, did you adjkerntz -i.
A few pe
I'm in the throes of updating my diskless boot boxes to 5.2-BETA from my
5.1-CURRENT build box. I did a buildworld, and am now doing an
installworld to a DESTDIR.
cboss# make installworld DESTDIR=/cboss/devel/nfsroot/crash2.cboss.tislabs.com/
...
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Justin Smith wrote:
> >Are you running with GENERIC from 5.2-BETA? If so, you may wish to
> >recompile your kernel with WITNESS and INVARIANTS turned off and see if
> >that helps. These debugging features are critical during the development
> >process, but also seriously im
| while waiting on |
|| || a lock. Fixing |
|| || this requires|
| rpc.lockd(8) | In progress | Robert Watson | that the RPC |
| stability | |
FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Research Scientist, McAfee Research
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Robert Watson wrote:
> [NOTE: This is being resent due to a cvs update error that caused
>an un-updated version of the TODO list to be sent out e
[NOTE: This is being resent due to a cvs update error that caused
an un-updated version of the TODO list to be sent out earlier]
This is an automated bi-weekly mailing of the FreeBSD 5.2 open issues list.
The live version of this list is available at:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.2R
|
| | | | improve the |
| | | | consistency of the|
| MAC Framework | | | pathnames passed into |
| devfs path | In progress | Robert Watson | the MAC Framework |
| fixes
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, T Kellers wrote:
> I can't ssh to the laptop at this moment, but if the sound card is not
> detected by the kernel, can I force the detection by editing /boot/
> loader.conf with:
>
> userconfig_script_load="YES"
> snd_maestro3_load="YES"
> ?
>
> I have that in loader.conf
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Oliver Fischer wrote:
> Steve Kargl wrote:
> > Did you do "make buildkernel", "make installkernel" ,
> > and "mergemaster" in the order specified in src/UPDATING.
>
> :0 Until now I have been doing it always in the wrong order...
>
> Thanks, now I will try it in the right
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, David Rhodus wrote:
> >FWIW, even though I support the idea of dynamically linking
> >everything, the flipping of the switch there followed this
> >same pattern.
>
> Terry, what are some of the changes that Apple made to have everything
> dynamically linked in darwin ? Has an
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> I don't know what Matt is planning on delivering, but...
>
> http://developer.apple.com/darwin/projects/opendirectory/
>
> [...]
> lookupd is included with the Darwin project and is
> documented online in Apple's Support database and
>
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Maxim M. Kazachek wrote:
> MOST people uses /bin/sh only for rc scripts (to be correct, their
> system uses it). David O'Brien just tried to told, that NOBODY he knows
> will be REALLY impacted by performance loss, caused due dynamic /bin/sh
> linking. You will... So, becaus
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Divacky Roman wrote:
> I upgraded from 5.1-RELEASE to current from 21st Nov about 10am CET...
> after make world+kernel I noticed one kernel panic - I was working for
> about 45 minutes then loaded if_ep module, then it crashed... (after a
> short while) 28 ?? WL 0:04.61 (
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Matt Smith wrote:
> Since updating two of my machines to the latest HEAD I am experiencing a
> total lockup on one of them.
>
> After being booted for approx 3 minutes the machine stops responding
> completely. It doesn't panic or drop into DDB. The numlock key doesn't
>
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2003-11-22 at 00:39:45 Tim Kientzle wrote:
>
> > Right now, /sbin/init is statically linked.
>
> Not here... I've built everything with WITH_DYNAMICROOT since the time
> the option was introduced, and as such:
>
> # file /sbin/init
> /sbin/init:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Ken Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 10:56:08AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> > Hmm. Well, it certainly sounds like a resource limit to me, especially if
> > it's a nice round number like "150" or "300".
>
> One pos
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Len Sassaman wrote:
> It is my intuition from this behavior that the sshd master process
> listening for connections is unable to spawn a new process to complete
> the authentication step, and thus the connection is being dropped. There
> is no information of use in dmesg, no
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Nov 19), Richard Coleman said:
> > I don't really care whether everything is statically or dynamically
> > linked. With the fast machines and huge disks these days, bloat is not
> > much of an issue. But nss and pam need to work co
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> > set init_path=/rescue/init
>
> If dynamic root were ready to be turned on, then /rescue/init would be
> in the default init_path.
The fallback path only works if the exec() fails cleanly without actua
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Robert Watson wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, here's the final patch. I believe it fixes both problems.
> >
> > Success! The system rebooted without pan
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Ok, here's the final patch. I believe it fixes both problems.
Success! The system rebooted without panicking. It even came back up
cleanly. :-)
In an earlier e-mail, you asked me for dmesg output. I've attached it on
the off chance you still want i
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> I am regularly getting those but unfortunately I neither have DDB in
> that kernel nor can get a crash dump nor do I have built wie DEBUG=-g.
>
> Is there anything more I can do apart from rebuilding kernel with
> support of all the missing debugging
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, David Schultz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003, Robert Watson wrote:
> > (2) Shells again, because they will be fork()d and exec()d frequently
> > during heavily scripted activities, such as system boot, periodic
> > events, large make jobs, etc
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There might be a certain 'coolness' WRT dynamically linking everything,
> but the overhead is certainly measurable. If the object is to maximally
> 'share', then for shells the FreeBSD VM shares maximally without using
> shared libs (perhaps there is
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Robert Watson wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> >
> > > Below you'll find the update patch for acpi_cpu. Please test this,
> > > especially for SMP and laptops with _CST obj
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Below you'll find the update patch for acpi_cpu. Please test this,
> especially for SMP and laptops with _CST objects in their ASL.
...
> Notes:
> * Add a detach method that disables entry to acpi_cpu_idle and in the SMP
> case, IPIs all processors to e
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> > Where the dead pointer comes from is what has yet to be discovered.
> >
> > Do you have an atapi-cd drive in this machine ?
>
> No.
>
> while pxebooting there is no floppy and no hd and no cf rader attached.
>
> fxp0, dual intel card fxp1,2 an ed
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 10:37 AM +0100 11/17/03, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> >Antoine Jacoutot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Here is what I did:
> >> $ cvsup blablabla...
> > > $ make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL &&
> > >make install kernel KERNCONF=MYK
1 - 100 of 682 matches
Mail list logo
