On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 10:57:11AM +0100, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 00:08 +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> >
> > Without looking at any of your code, I would kindly like to ask
> > you not to look at the Linux driver for eexpress too much -
> > i
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 12:58:28AM -0400, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Glendon Gross wrote:
> > Is it possible to use the old Intel EtherExpress-16 cards with FreeBSD?
>
> The driver was broken a while back and I'm right in the middle of trying
> to fix it. I've actually given u
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 06:23:57PM -0400, Peter Dufault wrote:
[snip]
> I guess I'm suggesting a clarification on when you want to set this flag.
> If I want to be sure I get my zeroed out stuff real soon should I use
> still use bzero?
No. What he means is that this 'zeroing process' will happen
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 02:52:37AM +0800, Donny Lee wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> is port tree back for cvsup?
Yes.
Greetz, Peter
--
dataloss networks
'/ignore-ance is bliss' - me
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 12:37:30AM +, attila! wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> on Sun, 8 Oct 2000 11:46:47 +0200, Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Actually, mailwrapper (I don't know about this mailcap thing,
> > I'm o
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 07:02:12AM +, attila! wrote:
[snip]
>
> (o) CAUTION: 'make world' reinstalls 'sendmail' even when
>
> NO_SENDMAIL=YES # do not build sendmail and related programs
>
> is included in '/etc/make.conf'; 'make world' may not
> compile sendmail, but
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:10:39AM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> > >This breaks several other ports (like BitchX).
> >
> > I think this breaks all IRC's which are cloned from the same origin :-)
>
> I'm still looking for the downside to this. ;-)
'HEY!' ;P
Greetz, Peter
--
dataloss networks
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 10:04:47AM +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
>
>
> How much sense does it make to think about implementing tee and
> select methods this way? Like "open file1 and file2 and write to
> both of them whatever I give to you" and "give me data coming in
> from whatever file is in
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 02:37:06PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
[snip]
> The majority of these programs could be handled by adding knowledge
> of "-" as a magic filename to fopen(3).
>
> At the same time I would really love if we implemented "|.*" to mean
> "do an popen(3)" instead.
Heh, and
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 12:44:33AM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
[snip]
>
> Please consider that we talk not about reads but about select. 'Select' is
> used to indicate that data is available while 'read' used to read it, they
> are two different things and behaviour of one thing not related t
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 07:50:56PM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> Consider this comment comes from screen(1):
>
> /*
> * Define this if your system exits select() immediatly if a pipe is
> * opened read-only and no writer has opened it.
> */
> #define BROKEN_PIPE 1
>
> We have broken(?) pi
11 matches
Mail list logo
