and jmallett@ were pretty young when they joined,
too.
Just an observation, I know that one or two isolated cases do not prove
a point :)
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@freebsd.org p.penc...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key
eah, I've been lazy, and
yeah, some weird src.conf settings might confuse the build of some of my
software on FreeBSD. And, of course, my software might very well not
build at all on other BSD-like host platforms. But... yeah, well, I've
been lazy ;)
...thanks for reading so far, I guess
hand,
and your choice is honored even if later a package with an even higher
priority is installed.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@space.bgr...@ringlet.netr...@freebsd.org
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF
ted
to network drivers, either - as you have no doubt discovered so far -
there should be no need to give up its advantages if it's possible to
retain them and even gain much in portability for the writing of future
drivers (should NetGraph run on more OS's).
G'luck,
Peter
--
Pe
eck.. I am not
> sure if it's NFS bug, I might missed option or it's just normal.
Yes, this is a known problem: the tests run by daemontools seem to
hang forever due to some problems with locking files over NFS.
I guess I should add a WITHOUT_TESTS knob to disable the test run.
G
.h. As well, arpa/inet.h must include netinet/in.h. IOW,
> each
> of these files must #include the other in order to work correctly.
>
> As you might guess, this is a less than desirable situation. A
> #includes
> B and B #includes A is a very bad arrangement. However, unless bo
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 11:44:42AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:33:09PM +0200, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
> > Is a real need for ports under -CURRENT to require (from a
> > week or two, I don't remember) XFree86-libraries?
>
> Yes.
To elaborate a bit, the default XFree86
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 09:49:59AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 10:27:10PM +0200, Christian Carstensen wrote:
> >
> > hmm,
> >
> > i've posted the attached mail a week ago to this list, but got no
> > response. could someone please comment on this issue?
>
> I've al
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 05:33:54PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> OK, more details on 4.3-STABLE -> 5.0-CURRENT upgrade path breakage.
>
> 1. kbdcontrol(1) is used by usr.sbin/sysinstall/Makefile to generate
> keymap.h with keyboard maps.
>
> 2. Recent usr.sbin/sysinstall/Makefile wants to
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:23:54PM -0500, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:23:02AM -0700, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
> > I just wanted to close http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=25030
> > by frobbing NOTES. While 4.2-R LINT has option USER_LDT, NOTES doesn't
> > have it anym
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:28:09PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 06:03:38PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > The syntax for declaring manual pages has been changed.
> >
> > The manual pages to be installed can now be listed in a
> > single MAN variable. The o
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 12:59:24PM +0800, David Xu wrote:
> Hello Julian,
>
> Friday, March 16, 2001, 12:18:15 PM, you wrote:
>
> JE> David Xu wrote:
> >>
> >>I wonder status of KSE, I am dreaming rewrite our application
> >> server using kqueue+pthread(KSE), current, we use poll()+pthread
Hi,
I think you're the main maintainer of the ACPICA codebase (and yes, I know
that parts of it is imported from Intel). Attached is a trivial patch which
makes for cleaner testing for RB_POWEROFF in acpi_shutdown_final() - I've had
various kernel/userland routines invoke reboot sequences where
Hi,
I've decided to finally start playing with -current a day or five ago.
One of the first experiences was a funny syscons keyboard freeze when
using a custom kernel with 'options VESA' and the logo_saver kernel module.
The symptoms: after the saver relinquishes control, the keyboard is kind of
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:12:10AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I've never thought of a use for fdescfs...
Well.. just a trivial example - imagine a program which takes a filename
as an argument; imagine yourself trying to pipe something into it -
passing /dev/fd/0 as a filename to process wou
15 matches
Mail list logo
