On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:01:23 -0500 (EST)
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is an automated bi-weekly mailing of the FreeBSD 5.2 open issues
> list. The live version of this list is available at:
>
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.2R/todo.html
>
> Automated mailing of this lis
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 20:55:39 -0700
"peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey, I saw this post on
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2003-May/002982.html
> on Mon May 12 22:36:58 PDT 2003. I am having problems with my nic
> card. I also got the "device_probe_and_attach: atkbd0 att
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 14:29:37 -0700
"Cliff L. Biffle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> group know that the world and kernel seem quite stable using the athlon-tbird
> optimizations. Not to mention smokingly fast.
Is that just a -CURRENT thing, I can't see anything like that in -STABLE's LINT.
--
On Fri, 24 May 2002 10:25:53 -0400 (EDT)
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey gang, although Intel's document seems to claim that they tested
> proper operation of pause I'd like people with non-Intel processors
> to verify that it actually works. Please compile the attached test
> prog
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 20:08:02 +0300
Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0x3000-0x307f mem
> 0xfa001000-0xfa00107f irq 5 at device 8.0 on pci2
>
> at 100baseTX is slower than 10Mgb :-(
>
I recently had a similar problem. My switch (Netgear F
