Re: poudriere and the user ... is it mostly a lost idea?

2025-01-17 Thread Paul Mather
On Jan 17, 2025, at 1:30 pm, Dennis Clarke wrote: >I have plenty of logs. Piles of them. Perhaps the problem is that I > am building on a 15-CURRENT machine which has poudriere jails like so : > > titan# poudriere jails -l > JAILNAME VERSION ARCH METHOD TIMESTA

Re: No valid device tree blob found!

2024-10-31 Thread Paul Mather
On Oct 31, 2024, at 3:50 pm, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Am 2024-10-31 20:43, schrieb Mark Millard: >> lexander Leidinger wrote on >> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 21:11:52 UTC : >>> I've updated an oracle ampere instance running -current from >>> 2024-09-12-140543 to 2024-10-30-121420 and now I get:

Re: Strange network/socket anomalies since about a month

2024-04-22 Thread Paul Mather
On Apr 22, 2024, at 3:26 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, > > I see a higher failure rate of socket/network related stuff since a while. > Those failures are transient. Directly executing the same thing again may or > may not result in success/failure. I'm not able to reproduce this at w

Re: NanoBSD: CURRENT unable to compile 13-STABLE : error: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated ... in C

2023-02-27 Thread Paul Mather
On Feb 27, 2023, at 2:57 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 27 Feb 2023, at 19:19, FreeBSD User wrote: >> >> Running recent CURRENT as host (FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #23 >> main-n261147-b8bb73ab724b: Sun Feb 26 >> 17:39:38 CET 2023 amd64), and nanoBSD (recent 13-STABLE, git stable/13). >> >> Building

Re: SAMBA 416-4.16.6 ad GNOME together is impossible :(

2022-11-06 Thread Paul Mather
On Nov 6, 2022, at 9:20 AM, wrote: > I try to get FreeBSD14 current running with both > - GNOME > - SAMBA > That seems to be impossible ☹ GNOME and SAMBA416 seems to be conflicting ! > I need SAMBA416 since SAMBA413 is simply not working :( > > Installing SAMBA does remove GNOME components

Re: Good practices with bectl

2022-09-20 Thread Paul Mather
On Sep 20, 2022, at 6:19 PM, Alan Somers wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 4:14 PM Nuno Teixeira wrote: >> >> Hello to all, >> >> I will use becl for the first time for current upgrades. >> Just to check that I'm thinking correctly: >> >> Create a test environment for upgrade: >>> bectl create

Re: Cross-compile worked, cross-install not so much ...

2022-04-25 Thread Paul Mather
On Apr 25, 2022, at 3:26 PM, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hi, > >> Am 25.04.2022 um 21:18 schrieb Brooks Davis : >> Cross install is not supported. As you have seen, certain tools are >> bootstrapped on the build host and used during the install process. You >> might be able to get away with nuk

Re: advice sought: workflow with -CURRENT and amd GPU [Re: -CURRENT hangs since at least 2022-04-04]

2022-04-19 Thread Paul Mather
On Apr 19, 2022, at 4:49 AM, Michael Schuster wrote: > Hi, > > I'm highjacking and re-purposing the previous thread, I hope that's OK > (I did change the subject ;-)) - I'm keeping some of the previous > contents for reference. > > I have similar HW to OP (Ryzen 7 4700 w. Renoir Graphics), and

Re: /etc/rc: ERROR: /etc/rc: no interface specified

2021-02-24 Thread Paul Mather
On Feb 24, 2021, at 11:18 AM, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On 21. 2. 24., Paul Mather wrote: >> I have two systems on which I run -CURRENT. I updated them yesterday to the >> following: FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #1 main-n245033-6ab923cbca87: Tue Feb 23 >> 21:29:31 EST 2021. Both

/etc/rc: ERROR: /etc/rc: no interface specified

2021-02-24 Thread Paul Mather
I have two systems on which I run -CURRENT. I updated them yesterday to the following: FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #1 main-n245033-6ab923cbca87: Tue Feb 23 21:29:31 EST 2021. Both use the stock GENERIC-NODEBUG kernel. Since the update, the systems do not boot up correctly. I get this late in the bo

Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD src repo transitioning to git this weekend

2020-12-22 Thread Paul Mather
On Dec 22, 2020, at 1:39 PM, bob prohaska wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 05:46:35PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> The FreeBSD project will be moving it's source repo from subversion to git >> starting this this weekend. The docs repo was moved 2 weeks ago. The ports >> repo will move at the

Re: BBB (cpsw(4)) seems to be broken in the latest 11-current

2016-06-21 Thread Paul Mather
On Jun 20, 2016, at 6:33 PM, Keith White wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jun 2016, Luiz Otavio O Souza wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >>> Jim, some update from here. Running r283287 of the driver, I still see the >>> same "watchdog timeout" messages, but they do not lead t

Re: BBB (cpsw(4)) seems to be broken in the latest 11-current

2016-06-20 Thread Paul Mather
On Jun 18, 2016, at 2:50 AM, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Updated my BBB to the latest -current, immediately got this while trying to > make world over ssh console: > > 06:02:17 CPSW watchdog cpswss0: watchdog timeout > cpswss0: Unable to cleanly shutdown transmitter > > Interface seems to be locked

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-20 Thread Paul Mather
___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-20 Thread Paul Mather
On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:54 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >> A packaged base is just another way of describing the state of the >> system. People on mailing lists will still be able to help people >> fix their problems, but they'll just use different information to >> pinpoint the precise componen

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

2016-04-20 Thread Paul Mather
> Message: 20 > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:48:06 +0300 > From: Slawa Olhovchenkov > To: Dan Partelly > Cc: David Chisnall , Julian Elischer > , Nathan Whitehorn , > freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8) > Message-ID: <20160420094806.gj6

Re: Strange ZFS filesystem corruption

2011-10-11 Thread Paul Mather
On Oct 4, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Olivier Smedts wrote: > 2011/10/3 Paul Mather : >> I know ZFS does not have a fsck utility ("because it doesn't need one":), >> but does anyone know of any way of fixing this corruption short of >> destroying the pool, creating

Re: Strange ZFS filesystem corruption

2011-10-05 Thread Paul Mather
On Oct 5, 2011, at 9:03 AM, krad wrote: > Have you dont the simple thing and checked to see if you have any weird > whitespace in the dir names. Try using bash tab completion for the dir name. > Also drop all non bash completion rules as these might be messing things up. > > I have seen odd cha

Re: Strange ZFS filesystem corruption

2011-10-04 Thread Paul Mather
On Oct 3, 2011, at 6:19 PM, Artem Belevich wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Paul Mather wrote: >> = >> >> The pool itself reports no errors. I performed a scrub on the pool yet this >> bizarre filesystem corruption persists: >> >> =

Strange ZFS filesystem corruption

2011-10-03 Thread Paul Mather
I wasn't sure whether to post this here or on sta...@freebsd.org. The system now runs RELENG_9, but the ZFS pool exhibiting problems was created, IIRC, under 9-CURRENT. I believe RELENG_9 is sufficiently close to HEAD at this stage that this list is probably the correct place for this message.