: MAC/ntpd (mac_ntpd)
root@colossus:~ # uname -a
FreeBSD colossus.isux.com 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT r346979
GENERIC amd64
root@colossus:~ #
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https
disagree with you
over is who you are speaking to ML is a long standing 'old hat' of
FreeBSD and someone I respect and I know would not be putting 'kludges'
and substandard code into the trees... Direct your anger elsewhere,
whilst still making valid points.
Regards,
Mic
parietal art remained fixed.
In all, a discomfiture of abundance. View the rubrics below, and
marvel
at their profusion and magnitude! Marvel!
You're trolling right?
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-current@freebs
> to provide more detailed information and help to debug to hunt this bug
> down.
>
Sorry - I can't help here, I don't have time to debug as too busy fixing
broken systems from Sept 1 changes.
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
_
Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The ports tree has been modified to only support pkg(8) as package management
>> system for all supported version of FreeBSD.
>>
>> if you were still using pkg_install (pkg_
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> +--On 3 septembre 2014 16:36:29 +0200 Michelle Sullivan
> wrote:
> | Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> |> I still don't see what you have to say about what EOL mean, it's *End Of
> |> Life* meaning after, it is dead, and won't exist any more
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> I still don't see what you have to say about what EOL mean, it's *End Of
> Life* meaning after, it is dead, and won't exist any more.
>
>
Ahh so all those Windows XP servers are dead and don't work anymore...
--
Miche
Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Michelle Sullivan
> wrote:
>
>
>> This is my only option - however, I suspect I'm already f**ked - my
>> build servers kicked off at 4am and the non pkg jails automatically
>> converted themselv
Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Sep 2, 2014, at 4:47, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>>
>> Marcus von Appen wrote:
>>
>>> Alban Hertroys :
>>>
>>>
>>>> I can totally understand that at some point it starts to get
>>>
(forget the date) ... I'm happy with
an EOL and working to upgrade everything, I'm not happy that the EOL was
not actually an EOL and it was actually a deadline.
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing
Andrew Berg wrote:
> On 2014.09.01 22:09, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>
>> That's my point - there was a patch waiting to submit that knowingly
>> broke pkg_install at midnight on the day after the EOL... the EOL
>> shouldn't be an EOL - because it was really a &
Andrew Berg wrote:
> On 2014.09.01 21:27, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>
>> Actually it's an inconvenience for someone like me and you. Not for
>> many freebsd users, and certainly not for me 6 months ago if I hadn't
>> been writing my own ports oh and
Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> You should try arguing with someone like Bank of Americas security and
> operations
> department
You work for the same company as me?
> some day about whether they want to suddenly upgrade 300 machines
> for no real reason (from their perspective
installed svn already...
> pkg(8) is a package management tool, and to make use of most packages
> having a copy of the ports tree is not required.
>
>
Correct, take a 9.2 install disk, install it, portsnap and then install
pkg on it... Oh wait, you can't.. pkg_install i
if some committers want to provides updates on the
> for pkg_install users:
> https://svn.FreeBSD.org/ports/branches/pkg_install
>
> Please note that this branch is not officially maintained and that we strongly
> recommend that you do migrate to pkg(8)
>
> Best regards,
&
15 matches
Mail list logo
