t be
run along with other ports/builds to create a rootfs automatically.
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Yerenkow
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 6:13 PM
To: Michael Vale
Cc: Adrian Chadd ; freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Cross Architecture Compiling
Not sure if it helps, but
install program but the
singular required binary does retain itself in
/usr/ports/sysutils/busybox/work/busybox/busybox.
change ‘mips-freebsd-‘ to the xdev compiler of your choice.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Vale
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 3:26 PM
To: Garrett Cooper
From: Garrett Cooper
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 3:05 PM
To: Michael Vale
Cc: Baptiste Daroussin
Subject: Re: Cross Architecture Compiling
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Michael Vale wrote:
Forwarding my latest zrouter redmine submission, where I have been working on
updating
ore complicated scenarios.
Some ports with GNU Makefiles have a different means of cross-compiling,
e.g. busybox. I'll post those findings next.
Regards,
Michael Vale.
surfnet.co
-Original Message-
From: redm...@zrouter.org
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 1:42 PM Subject: [zrouter -
of the same work is
required as android uses the linux kernel.
-Original Message-
From: Garrett Cooper
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 3:10 AM
To: Michael Vale
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too!
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:03 AM,
in it's current state it makes sense to install it into /compat/linux(/lib)
and build ports with USE_LINUX_PREFIX etc on
-Original Message-
From: Michael Vale
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 3:03 AM
To: Stefan Esser ; freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD in Google Co
-Original Message-
From: Michael Vale
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 3:02 AM
To: Stefan Esser
Subject: Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too!
yeah it builds fine as it has no dependencies.
currently it only has syscalls for linux (emulation) and any binary app you
fwiw, im about to start hacking away at bsd.ports.mk and alike for this
exact reason (i'm trying to avoid doing so). am i free/welcome/open to
register this on Google SOC? will anybody here mentor?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Vale
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 9:21
P.s. - for what it's worth - Google are interested in porting bionic back
to *BSD, i've seen some discussion on the NetBSD lists.
-Original Message-----
From: Michael Vale
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 9:01 AM
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD in Google Co
yeah, 32-bit vs. 64, or mips, arm, etc etc.
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Burns
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 9:04 AM
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Fw: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too!
On 10/24/2012 4:57 PM, Michael Vale wrote:
-Original
Another idea, how about reducing the size of libc, porting bionic back to
freebsd and/or porting musl libc (http://www.musl-libc.org) to FreeBSD?
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Chadd
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 8:29 AM
To: Michael Vale
Subject: Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In
-Original Message-
From: Michael Vale
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 8:57 AM
To: Adrian Chadd
Subject: Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too!
oh i only replied to you, not the thread.
I have some ideas though...
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Chadd
12 matches
Mail list logo
