On 01/23/16 09:15, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Are you sure of this? I have not looked at the code, but my former
> colleagues at the high performance research network ESnet claim at
> http://fasterdata.es.net/data-transfer-tools/say-no-to-scp/ that the
> internal buffers and effective window size hav
On 11/10/15 1:42 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Some of you may have noticed that OpenSSH in base is lagging far behind
the upstream code.
The main reason for this is the burden of maintaining the HPN patches.
They are extensive, very intrusive, and touch parts of the OpenSSH code
that change si
On 04/01/2014 07:46, dte...@freebsd.org wrote:
> Eitan,
>
> While I understand your frustration, VICOR is using FreeBSD as a Desktop since
> FreeBSD 2.2. We don't use sound and we are fine relying on vesa.
>
> While I understand that the things you listed are actual short-comings for
> normal
>
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> I have an asr based RAID controller (Adaptec 2400A), though it is an IDE
> RAID controller, it uses the "SCSI" asr driver. My controller has
> worked very well with FreeBSD 5.x, and the server is currently running
> 5.1-BETA. The only thing that does
