> > Remove the # ("stringify") operator from the printf()
> > arguments in
> > the iprintf macro. It was causing the actual format string and
> > variable names to be written out, instead of substituting the
> > values of the variables into the format string.
>
> I take it that gcc's preprocesso
> Hi,
>
> While trying to port the SCTP-KAME code to CURRENT,
> I noticed that M_NOTIFICATION is missing from
> in CURRENT, but it is present in the KAME version of this
> file.
>
> Any reason not to apply this patch?
>
> --- sys/sys/mbuf.h.orig Sat Sep 13 19:34:07 2003
> +++ sys/sys/mbuf.h Sat Se
> > Folks,
> >
> > Okay, so now I just figured out what the "ath" driver is. Sigh...
> >
> > Of course, I find this out through searching for open source
> > drivers for the Broadcom chipset as used in the Linksys WPC54G
> > cardbus device, which I happen to have just bought.
> >
> >
> > I've alre
> I recently forgot my root password, rebooted single-user and changed it,
> and immediately afterwards the computer denied the existence of any
> non-root users (home directories still there for those that had them,
> they still have login shells, etc.). This was the only change made to
> the syst
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: ACPI problems with HEAD and IBM ThinkPad T23
> > From: &qu
> Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > I cvsup'd from 5.0-R to HEAD and enabled ACPI to see if anything had
changed
> > in the past 6 months.
> > Indeed, things have, and a few workarounds I had implemented before were
no
> > longer needed.
> >
> > However, I st
I cvsup'd from 5.0-R to HEAD and enabled ACPI to see if anything had changed
in the past 6 months.
Indeed, things have, and a few workarounds I had implemented before were no
longer needed.
However, I still got a host of errors from ACPI upon boot, and some hacks to
device.hints were still neccess
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Moran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 10:30 AM
Subject: Overall "feel" for the stability of FreeBSD 5
> I'm considering setting up a FreeBSD 5 machine as a dedicated
> backup/archive computer on a network I adm
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Moran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: Overall "feel" for the stability of FreeBSD 5
> From: &qu
Sorry, you're right. libc is where you want to be putting your code. (I'm
suffering from multiple-OS-itis right now.)
--
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "David Leimbach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[E
- Original Message -
From: "David Leimbach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 8:29 AM
Subject: "Just" building the lib part of world
> Or even better would be just building libc. I have been working on my
> getpwnam_r assignment...
> examining im
- Original Message -
From: "Brian J. Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 5:45 PM
Subject: freebsd 5.0 on hp netserver lf
> Folks,
>
> I posted a question earlier on freebsd-questions concerning this, and have
since discovered a bit more. Sorry
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>
> > < said:
> >
> > > What would be really cool is if more config files could
> > > do 'includes' so that you could have a syslogd.local.conf
> > > wher eall your local entries could be. In addition you could make it
> > > look in /usr/local/etc/syslo
s << "out\n";
}
// end code
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brent Verner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: gcc-3.2.1 and c++ headers
It compiled on -CURRENT and -STABLE using this:
#include
You've got #include in your example below.
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Brent Verner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
Your working example below compiles without error using gcc 2.95.x (FreeBSD
4.x) and gcc 3.2.x (FreeBSD 5.x), which is expected since it's compliant
C++. (See Stroustrup's The C++ Programming Language, section 9.2.2, which
indicates that the proper way to include C++ standard library headers such
> I'm trying to debug a kernel problem with the RC1 install CD (I get a
> hang) - basically playing with various kernel options and putting debug
> printfs.
>
> pxeboot sounded like just the thing I needed - burning CDs or floppies
> being too cumbersome for me. I've followed the recipe and get to
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> , Garret
> t Rooney writes:
> > > The following program builds and runs under 4.7-STABLE:
> > >
> > > #include
> > >
> > > int main()
> > > {
> > > cout<<"Hello World\n";
> > > }
> > >
> > > ... but under 5.0-CURRENT it gives me the following errors:
> >
As Nate kindly pointed out, my laptop needed a BIOS upgrade. With the
upgrade, I can boot fine with ACPI enabled, although some
sleep/suspend/resume stuff doesn't work right. Nate's already reported
that.
Thanks,
Matt
- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Emmerton" &l
ACPI stiil fails miserably on my Thinkpad T23 with these patches.
I've attached the ASL and DSDT data in tar.gz format.
Output from boot -v (transcribed by hand, so forgive any obvious typos)
Note -- the 'o' character in 'So' below is really o with an umlat. I
suspect the space in 'T ' is a non-
> In message: <010501c285dc$87da1170$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : This also happens with my an0 card, so it's probably a larger ACPI +
PCCARD
> : interoperability issue.
>
> Its a ACPI issue. We
> Hello,
>
> Another problem with my Orinoco card is that after a resume from (ACPI)
> sleep, the configuration set on the card is lost, so I have to set the
> ssid, wepkey etc again before it can operate properly.
>
> I am not sure if this is a flaw in the wi0 driver (probably not) or
> something
> At 9:37 AM -0400 10/3/02, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > > Garance A Drosihnwrites:
> >>
> >> >I think it would be very prudent that any base-system expat have
> > > >it's own name, even if it's just "expat2fb".
> > &
> In message , Garance A Drosihn
writes:
>
> >I think it would be very prudent that any base-system expat have
> >it's own name, even if it's just "expat2fb". I have no opinion
> >on whether that should be the full expat2 or a stripped down
> >functionality,
> * De: David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-09-02 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: aout support broken in gcc3 ]
> > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:24:19PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > > I thought it was part of the plan to drop all traces of a.out support
in
&g
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Peter Wemm wrote:
>
> > Bruce Evans wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
> > >
> > > > Apparently, On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:24:08PM +1000,
> > > > Bruce Evans said words to the effect of;
> > > >
> > > > >
DB will help me
out. Any suggestions?
--
Matthew Emmerton || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GSI Computer Services || http://www.gsicomp.on.ca
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
enced code into a GPL
product. Obviously, this will cause problems.
Afaik, the patches can remain part of the ports tree without problems.
--
Matthew Emmerton || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GSI Computer Services || http://www.gsicomp.on.ca
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Patrik Sundberg wrote:
> hi,
>
> Dear all...
>
> First of all, really sorry for cross-posting...
>
> I am running a -CURRENT system (Apr 30th 2001). There is a user in my
> machine running this small program to DoS my xl0 interface. I doubt that
> this program is specifically designed for xl cards though.
>
> Once the program i
29 matches
Mail list logo