Re: samba+zfs

2011-11-09 Thread Kurt Touet
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Nov 8, 2011, at 11:07 PM, "Daniel O'Connor" wrote: > >> >> On 09/11/2011, at 17:32, Garrett Cooper wrote dd's of large files (spooled backups going to tape) to /dev/null are as slow as Samba. >>> >>>   - Dedupe? >> >> Nope. >>

Re: samba+zfs

2011-11-09 Thread Kurt Touet
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On 09/11/2011, at 17:32, Garrett Cooper wrote >>> dd's of large files (spooled backups going to tape) to /dev/null are as >>> slow as Samba. >> >>    - Dedupe? > > Nope. > >>    - Compression? > > On the mail spool & ports, but not on the

Re: samba+zfs

2011-11-08 Thread Kurt Touet
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Dan The Man wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Kurt Touet wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Dan The Man wrote: >>> >>> >>> Sorry I meant it was running fine on beta3 and 8.2 stable, and NOT RC1: >>> asterisk

Re: samba+zfs

2011-11-08 Thread Kurt Touet
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Dan The Man wrote: > > > Sorry I meant it was running fine on beta3 and 8.2 stable, and NOT RC1: > asterisk:~# uname -a > FreeBSD asterisk.sunsaturn.com 9.0-RC1 FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 #0: Mon Oct 31 > 19:46:53 CDT 2011 dr...@asterisk.sunsaturn.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKE