(see below, my question got answered already)
Joe Laughlin wrote:
> Scott Long wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Once again it's my pleasure to announce Release Cadidate 3 of
> > FreeBSD 5.0. i386, pc98, alpha, ia64, and sparc64 releases are
> > availab
walt wrote:
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -DLIBC_SCCS -I/usr/src/lib/libkvm -c
/usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_proc.c -o kvm_proc.o
/usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_proc.c: In function `kvm_proclist':
/usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_proc.c:376: structure has no member named
`ke_pctcpu'
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [
on Current cvsupped at 1:15 PST on 1/12/03, I get the following
===> lib/libkvm
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f .depend -a-DLIBC_SCCS -I/usr/src/lib/libkvm
/usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.c /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_i386.c
/usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_file.c /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_getloadavg.c
/usr/src/lib/libkvm
In the UPDATING file, the following is noted:
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT has many debugging features turned on, in
both the kernel and userland. These features attempt to detect
incorrect use of system primitives, and encourage loud failure
through extra sanity checking a
Currently, I"m running STABLE on my machine, which serves as both a
desktop and a server. It seems to work great and everything. Does
everything I need it to do.
Is there any compelling reason for me to upgrade to 5.0 next year? I've
read over the list of anticipated new features and there's
