Re: ports and PBIs

2010-04-30 Thread James Butler
m with additional tools that > target certain use cases, and PBI seems a good > fit for the desktop case. > > Tim Genuine (possibly stupid) question -in PBI land, what happens if package B is, say, CUPS? Does one need versioned rc.d scripts to start one or the other? Which one gets

Re: ports and PBIs

2010-04-13 Thread James Butler
to install C5.3 with B4.0 alongside A1.1 and B3.2. I'll try to find the paper I'm recalling after work, until then I'll just have to wave my hands in the air. -James Butler working on a new package system in MidnightBSD for some time. When we weighed this issue, it was

Re: ports and PBIs

2010-04-11 Thread James Butler
with additional tools that > target certain use cases, and PBI seems a good > fit for the desktop case. > > Tim Genuine (possibly stupid) question - in PBI land, what happens if package B is, say, CUPS? Does one need versioned rc.d scripts to start one or the other? Which one get

Re: ports and PBIs

2010-04-11 Thread James Butler
m with additional tools that > target certain use cases, and PBI seems a good > fit for the desktop case. > > Tim Genuine (possibly stupid) question -in PBI land, what happens if package B is, say, CUPS? Does one need versioned rc.d scripts to start one or the other? Which one gets