Re: web Browsers (Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT)

2002-03-17 Thread Greg Black
Maxim Sobolev wrote: | On Sun, 2002-03-17 at 09:56, Greg Black wrote: | > Yeah right. Galeon wouldn't even build on the last FreeBSD box | > I tried it on when somebody told me to try it. | | It compiles/works here like a charm, however, if you do have problems | with it please sen

Re: web Browsers (Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT)

2002-03-17 Thread Greg Black
"David O'Brien" wrote: | On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 06:05:13AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: | > Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > > What problems do you have with it? | > | > Slow. Eats memory. Crashes all the time. Does not save state | > between sessions. Does not render HTM

Re: web Browsers (Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT)

2002-03-16 Thread Greg Black
Joerg Wunsch wrote: | "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | | >> Slow. Eats memory. Crashes all the time. Does not save state | >> between sessions. Does not render HTML 4 properly. Does not support | >> CSS properly. Does not zoom. Does not display PNG properly. | >> Incorrectly i

Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT

2002-03-15 Thread Greg Black
[Cc's trimmed] Kenneth Culver wrote: | > (ttypa):{1078}% file /usr/local/lib/netscape/communicator-4.7.us.bin | > /usr/local/lib/netscape/communicator-4.7.us.bin: FreeBSD/i386 compact | > demand paged dynamically linked executable | > | > Now, if you'd like to talk Netscape into building a ver

Re: Preparing innocent users for -current

2002-03-15 Thread Greg Black
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: | > 3. xconsole causes periodic panics. The problem (according to BDE) is "a | > well-know bug in printf(9)," caused by "The TIOCCONS ioctl ... panics when | > printf() is called while sched_lock is held." I reported this bug in | > October 2001, if anyone wants to look

Re: mtree verification output format

2000-10-02 Thread Greg Black
> > > >This is still very obscure; I'd like to see: > > > > > > > > size (was 1234, should be 5678) > > > > cksum (was 42424242, should be 69696969) > > > > > > > >...so that it's clear what the meaning of the numbers is. > > > > > > In that case I think I would like to loose the

Re: mtree verification output format

2000-10-02 Thread Greg Black
> >This is still very obscure; I'd like to see: > > > > size (was 1234, should be 5678) > > cksum (was 42424242, should be 69696969) > > > >...so that it's clear what the meaning of the numbers is. > > In that case I think I would like to loose the ',' also. While you're