Jeff Roberson wrote:
>
> I have commited libthr. To try this out you'll need to do the following
>
> 1. cvsup
> 2. rebuild world and kernel
> 3. install world and kernel
> 4. build libthr from src/lib/libthr
> 5. Either replace /usr/lib/libc_r.so.5 with /usr/lib/libthr.so.1 or
> relink your
Haha. I'm an idjit. Sorry.
That's what happens when you take isa out of the kernel config
(what was I thinking anyway? - fd and atkbdc among others need this and I
knew that).
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Geoffrey wrote:
>
> This is repeatable. Re-cvsupped us
This is repeatable. Re-cvsupped using the same tag yesterday
morning and rebuilt on a clean /obj with the same result.
5.0 Release appears to be broken.
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Geoffrey wrote:
>
> Ladies and Gentlemen
>
> From a fresh cvsup of RELENG_5_0 this aft
Ladies and Gentlemen
From a fresh cvsup of RELENG_5_0 this afternoon, make buildkernel
returns:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/src/sys/i386/isa/npx.c:1078: warning: `npx_driver' defined but not
used
/usr/src/sys/i386/isa/npx.c:1084: warning: `npx_devclass' defined but not
use
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
> It points out that no one uses I386 kernels. Is it more valuable
> to have GENERIC_I386 or KDE on disc 1? If it came down to that I
> would pick KDE.
>
This is getting silly. As much respect as I have for you, KDE is
not and shouldn't be part o
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 4:04 PM -0500 2/27/03, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> >I doubt the usefulness of this. i386 kernels were just accidentally
> >broken for almost a month and a half without anyone noticing.
> >People wouldn't have noticed if phk@ hadn't asked for a volu
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 06:51:55PM -0800, Rhett Monteg Hollander wrote:
>
> I'm afraid you're wrong - the V2SI datatype and MMX functions automatically
> become available after -march=pentium2, while with other processor types
> you've got to explicitly add
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Juli Mallett wrote:
> * De: Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-02-27 ]
> [ Subjecte: Any ideas why we can't even boot a i386 ? ]
> > Yup. 386dx - 33Mhz. Results below:
> >
> > Loaded kern.flp, mfsroot.flp, prompted for boot, then core dumped
> >
Good day ladies and gents
Cvsupping and rebuilding a 5.0 current box to release Monday
resulted in the following curiousness:
lock order reversal
1st 0xc1190068 process lock (process lock) @
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c:2
112
2nd 0xc11ac934 filedesc structure (filedesc structure) @
Further to my previous message on encrypting swap:
In order for it to work, apparently, one must change the fstype within
the disklabel, so that the swap partition (e.g. /dev/ad0s1b) is fstype
"4.2BSD", not "swap".
At least, I had to do that before it would work.
Geoffre
On 24 Dec, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> I wrote the attached program to open "/dev/ad0".
>
> It consistently fails with:
> fd: -1
> Error: : Operation not permitted
At what securelevel are you running?
g.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the bo
To disable sendmail, one expects to set "sendmail_enable=NO" in
/etc/rc.conf.
/etc/rc.sendmail looks for sendmail_enable=[Nn][Oo][Nn][Ee]
(should be [Nn][Oo] to conform with standard usage.)
The consequence is that an administrator may intend to disable
sendmail, but it will still be enabled.
g.
I've run into similar problems dual-booting 4.x and 5.x. Is there
some utility one can use to synchronize this once and for all?
IMHO, when the UFS1 superblock was changed, it should have been named
something else like UFS1_1 to avoid confusion.
gtf
--
Geoffrey T. Falk, BSc, MA, SCJ2P, SCS
13 matches
Mail list logo
