Re: hwpstate_intel hangs kernel

2020-05-27 Thread Diane Bruce
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 08:25:52PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 1:57 AM Diane Bruce wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 02:45:50PM +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > > > > Ok I am going to respond to this old email from February.. > > >

Re: hwpstate_intel hangs kernel

2020-05-21 Thread Diane Bruce
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 02:45:50PM +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote: Ok I am going to respond to this old email from February.. > Hello, > > I upgraded to a newer version, git 87d669d3863-c266265, and I do not > experience the random hang anymore. The machine still hangs on boot on > "hwpstate_inte

Re: mouse is broken

2020-03-10 Thread Diane Bruce
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 06:37:01AM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 09:12:49PM -0400, AN wrote: > > > > After an update today to world, kernel, and ports my mouse no longer works. > > Mouse works on console. I use startx, mouse seems to break after startx is > > issued. > > > >

Re: Runtime loader issue

2018-05-10 Thread Diane Bruce
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 08:15:22AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:24:52AM -0400, Diane Bruce wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:46:31AM +0300, Gleb Popov wrote: > > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 2:45 AM, Steve Kargl < > > > s...@trout

Re: Runtime loader issue

2018-05-10 Thread Diane Bruce
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:46:31AM +0300, Gleb Popov wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 2:45 AM, Steve Kargl < > s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > In review PR 228007, it came to my attention some individuals are > > mis-characterizing a FreeBSD loader issue as "gfortran's FreeBSD > >

Re: rcs

2013-10-10 Thread Diane Bruce
... > OK, but please, can we replace RCS with Fossil in 11 then? That adds a > real > improvement to FreeBSD while giving people plenty of time to prepare. Fossil was showing promise the last time I tried it. Quite frankly > > well since people expect RCS.. it is not a no brainer. > > y

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

2013-10-09 Thread Diane Bruce
... > > I notice in diff'ing your work vs my work, that I started with > newer revisions of some of the files than the ones you have: I was well aware of that. There is no point doing much more until there is a decision from core. - Diane -- - d...@freebsd.org d...@db.net http://www.db.net/~db

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

2013-10-08 Thread Diane Bruce
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 04:56:46PM -0400, Kurt Lidl wrote: > On 10/8/13 4:33 PM, Cy Schubert wrote: > > In message <52542687.7000...@pix.net>, Kurt Lidl writes: > >> On 10/8/13, Julian Elischer wrote: > >>> On 10/7/13 11:06 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:43:21PM -0400, Eit

Re: rcs is gone?

2013-10-07 Thread Diane Bruce
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 03:45:23PM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > On 2013-10-07, at 2:53 PM, David Chisnall wrote: > > > Or do you really only run the base OS and no other software on your > > systems, without any of your own code or any customisation? > > We install from the base release

Re: Light humour

2013-04-28 Thread Diane Bruce
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 06:49:51PM -0400, Frank Seltzer wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Apr 2013, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > Yeah, the trouble is that people can/will believe this nonsense. > > > > So, question. Where's the pro-BSD blog(s) to offset it? :) http://www.softpanorama.org/Copyright/License_cla

Re: Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148

2012-07-13 Thread Diane Bruce
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 08:38:08AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2012-Jul-13 11:58:05 -0400, David Schultz wrote: > >I propose we set a timeframe for this, on the order of a few months. > ... > >If the schedule can't be met, then we can just import Cephes as an > >interim solution without furthe

Re: Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148

2012-07-13 Thread Diane Bruce
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 01:53:39PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: > On 13 Jul 2012, at 13:18, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Friday, July 13, 2012 7:41:00 am Peter Jeremy wrote: > >> AFAIK, none of the relevant standards (POSIX, IEEE754) have any > >> precision requirements for functions other than +-

Re: Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148

2012-07-11 Thread Diane Bruce
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 02:43:46PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:20:09PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:02:33AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 10, 2012, at 3:10 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote: > > >

Re: Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148

2012-07-11 Thread Diane Bruce
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:02:33AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Jul 10, 2012, at 3:10 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote: > > Not having R would be a bit pain in my backside. That's one of the practical > considerations that I was talking about. It is very real, and if I have to, > I'll commit the

Re: FreeBSD 10 prognostication...

2012-05-20 Thread Diane Bruce
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 04:42:12PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: > Jamie wrote: > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 07:20:18PM -0400, Vance Siemens wrote: > > > Eh, sorry. I got excited at the prospect of downloading FreeBSD from ... > Well, I worked for a computer science dept. for 30years and it seemed > to

Re: [RFC] Un-staticise the toolchain

2012-04-26 Thread Diane Bruce
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 07:52:01AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, April 26, 2012 7:38:03 am Bob Bishop wrote: > > Hi, > > ... > > You could use /rescue/sh as your single-user shell. Of course, that would > perhaps let you still be able to recompile things if you had a static > toolc

Re: rtld or lang/gcc cannot find libgcc_s.so.1

2012-02-21 Thread Diane Bruce
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-02-21 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote: > ... > > Yes, /lib comes before /usr/local/lib/gcc46. I suppose > > that this is a heads up for gerald@. lang/gcc is used by > > the ports collections to build a large number of other > > por

Re: CVS removal from the base

2011-12-02 Thread Diane Bruce
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 04:27:34PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: > Hello! ... > As soon as ports/ (and doc/) are moved to SVN I do not see any > compelling reasons for keeping CVS in the base system. Well. We _could_ replace it with SCCS. -- - d...@freebsd.org d...@db.net http://www.db.net/~db Why le

Re: can somebody explains OFDM in FreeBSD?

2011-03-06 Thread Diane Bruce
I've moved this off of freebsd-current into private e-mail folks. > > Twisted pair? Sorry I don't understand this... Wireless USB dongles are ... > This is out-of-scope but I respect your opinion to call me a name attempting It is not an ad hominem when it is factually true. These are not chem

Re: can somebody explains OFDM in FreeBSD?

2011-03-06 Thread Diane Bruce
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 09:56:05AM -0500, Etienne Robillard wrote: > On 06/03/11 09:33 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > On Sunday 06 March 2011 15:23:02 Etienne Robillard wrote: > > .. > > Yes, from a security perspective, could radiance from ELF/VLF operating > devices as > "ethernet-class s

Re: can somebody explains OFDM in FreeBSD?

2011-03-06 Thread Diane Bruce
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 03:33:32PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Sunday 06 March 2011 15:23:02 Etienne Robillard wrote: > > Hi, as the subject line implies, can someone explains why OFDM (Orthogonal > > Frequency Division Multiplexing) is required for running run(4) ? Is there > > any (saf

Re: log2(), log2f() and log2l() support in freebsd

2010-10-15 Thread Diane Bruce
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:06:05AM +, Alexander Best wrote: > hi there, > > could we please have support for log2(), log2f() and log2l() in freebsd? I have run into a similar problem. I already started with some complex functions: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147599&cat= And a