Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
Indeed. There is an old story from the days of the big irons, when
IBM had an "objective" release criterion stating that no new release
of their OS would be shipped with more than 100 major bugs.
As a result, before each release, the engineers would have a big
meeting
Leif Neland wrote:
But still, would it be impossible to have both a GENERIC and a GENERIC386
kernel in the distribution?
Impossible, no... but would anyone use it? Seems to me that it would
just take up space. And it's one more thing for the build gurus to keep
a configuration for (though ma
Juli Mallett wrote:
Are you implying that these people, who are undoubtedly adding and
removing lots of things in the kernel, to make things fit, and to
make things do their jobs, can't be bothered to use the appropriate
CPU settings?
Not sure where you got that from Terry's post, but...
As a s
