On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 06:37:21AM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
>
> What i mean seems to be that these guys already have the knowledge
> how to access the object database without any fancy and featureful
> and fat environment, so if FreeBSD would do that then possibly
> a simple from scratch che
On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 11:51:03AM +0100, FreeBSD User wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Dec 2024 17:20:39 +
> "Dave Cottlehuber" wrote:
>
> Thank you very much for responding!
>
> > On Tue, 3 Dec 2024, at 19:46, FreeBSD User wrote:
> > > On most recent CURRENT (on some boxes of ours, not all) fetch/git s
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 11:26:26AM +0100, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
>
> As I don't have skills to understand why this fix works, I'd like to have
> some expert opinion on this fix since I don't know if this will be
> supported in the future.
Not an expert, but here is my opinion: the workaround uses t
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 12:08:38PM +0100, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> Summary: Using bectl for upgrades
>
> RELEASE=Whatever
> > bectl create ${RELEASE}
> > bectl mount ${RELEASE}
> BASEDIR=/tmp/be_mount. # Use mount point returned by bectl mount
>
> [freebsd-update method]
> > freebsd-update -b $
