On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 at 22:17, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> >
> > I don't know if this is the right place to jump in, but I suspect this
> > is a related issue?
> > I'm trying to do the opposite - building 14 on a 13-STABLE machine. It
> > fails when trying to build ncurses:
> >
> > root@p14s-bsd:
On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 at 07:46, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 11:33:54PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 11:29 PM Kyle Evans wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 12:18 AM Warner Losh wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 10:45 PM Warner Losh
On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 19:05, David Chisnall wrote:
> [ Disclaimer: I work for Microsoft, but not on WSL and this is my own
> opinion ]
> (...)
> David
>
Just as a counterpoint to Rozhuk's take, that all sounds sensible
enough to me - FreeBSD would probably gain more from this than MS.
So the WSL
site. Much like
VHS, you apparently need to view it on preserved tech of a similar
vintage. On the positive side, a setup like that should at least keep
working indefinitely, unless they also manage to use HTTPS
certificates an old browser can't understand.
--
Daniel Nebdal
___
ted in characters.
It seems sensible to stick to an integer multiple of that, to avoid any
uncomfortable stretching or scaling. The 480x135 console you got follows
that idea - it's the 15x scale. That's obviously a bit optimistic, but how
about the 3x or 4x scale, at 96x27 or 128x36?
--
Daniel Nebdal
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ble to scp the files. It's possible that we may
> just end up sharing images more widely by way of releng generated
> images after commit. I'll see if there's an alternative for the last
> week of the CFT.
>
> Cheers.
> -M
The instructions for building it myself see
g.xz
freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img. 20% of 655 MB 647 kBps 12m23s
fetch: freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img.xz appears to be
truncated: 142065664/687158140 bytes
baymax /home/djn >
It also fails using Firefox on windows on a different machine. (It's
also
s-compliant
way for a classic BIOS to handle a GPT disk.
--
Daniel Nebdal
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
-RA-SSD30089593/SSD/dmesg
--
Daniel Nebdal
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ilto:l...@freebsd.org
>
Could it be relevant that the Debian binary was probably compiled with
gcc, and the FreeBSD binary with clang? This seems like the sort of
code that plausibly could bring out some compiler corner cases.
(It's weird that 1.1.1 is fine, though.)
--
Daniel Nebdal
_
rc_reclaim_thread
961 fork_exit
961 fork_trampoline
(I have nothing sensible to add about the actual problem.)
--
Daniel Nebdal
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
er, the
following sysctls can be set:
vfs.zfs.scrub_delay=0
vfs.zfs.top_maxinflight=128
vfs.zfs.resilver_min_time_ms=5000
vfs.zfs.resilver_delay=0
Setting those sysctls to those values increased my (Shawn Webb's)
resilver performance from 7MB/s to 230MB/s.
###
--
Daniel Nebdal
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
51
> > cpu6:timer
> > MB/s 0.00 3.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 636300 inact 53
> > cpu5:timer
> > %busy 0 3 0 0 0 0 cache
> > vgapci0
> > 61912 fr
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 02/11/16 15:00, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
>>
>> plugging in a
>> USB keyboard post-panic didn't do much
>
>
> Hi,
>
> USB enumeration is disabled in the debugger. You need to plug it in
> pre-c
gt;>> Your attachment was stripped. Can you post it somewhere and include the
>>>> url?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Allan Jude
>>>>
That looks kind of similar to one I just got (on r295122 , during a
lot of ZFS traffic) : https://goo.gl/ph
and be back where you were without too much fuss.
With the caveat that I've barely touched this myself.
[1]
https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/updating-existing-zfs-layout-to-beadm.44813/
--
Daniel Nebdal
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing
x27;s
not like our and their libc are massively different either, so ...
cautiously optimistic that it'll be a one-day job to get it compiling
on FreeBSD by the time they feel "done". :)
--
Daniel Nebdal
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org ma
rn the largest number of bytes that
would not allocate a larger block of memory than the provided minsize, in
the current memory situation", plus some veiled threats about not using
this value to do anything fancy with pointers to already-allocated memory.
--
Daniel Nebdal
wouldn't sending all packets
to all sockets all the time be kind of counterproductive?
Of course, I haven't actually used it much; I might be wrong.
--
Daniel Nebdal
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
rink to
match, and any program using it would still DTRT.
I'm completely ambivalent about adding it, though - it's not something I
need, it's more stuff that needs to be handled if you change/rewrite the
allocator, and it's not my decision.
--
Daniel Nebdal
___
is "a chore to
install packages into". I agree that it won't work without an internet
connection (or a local package repository), but that's hardly a
problem limited to FreeBSD.
Anyway, it seems likely that we'll get OpenRCS in base, hopefully
making everyone happy.
-
>
>
> --
> Alfred Perlstein
>
If they get the package repositories back up - which I assume will
happen before any official releases from 10 - it should just be "pkg
install rcs". As challenges go, that doesn't seem too bad?
That said, an online meta package bu
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:30 AM, ajtiM wrote:
> Thank ou.
>
> On Sep 16, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
>> Am 17.09.2013 01:04, schrieb ajtiM:
>>> Again me…
>>> I was (am) long postmaster user. Is it possible to use on FreeBSD 10 too,
>>> please? Or is better to use something differe
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Kristjan Eentsalu wrote:
> On 16.09.2013 13:35, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:> Wiadomość napisana
> przez Zaphod Beeblebrox w dniu 16 wrz 2013, o godz.
> 07:35:
>>> Is it now possible to boot from iSCSI? I'm not talking about an iSCSI
>>> controller, but with
>>
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Nicolas Alexander Scheibling
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as I am newly writing to these mailing lists, forgive my formal and
> content-relative mistakes.
>
> As it stands now, I would absolutely love installing some 10-CURRENT on
> my newly acquired SONY VAIO ultrabook. AF
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Gary Palmer wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 01:29:27PM +0100, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
>> Going by Zaphod's recommendation of using a /32 for each IP, how about this?
>>
>> ifconfig arge0 inet 192.168.1.100/32
>> ifconfig arge0 alias 1
How does your make.conf and src.conf look?
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Charlie Jones
wrote:
> I am trying to upgrade to 9.1-RELEASE
>
> uname -a
>
> FreeBSD havoc.innerlightcorp.com 8.2-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p2 #0:
> Mon May 30 12:58:18 MDT 2011
> r...@havoc.innerlightcorp.com:/usr/
Oh, you specifically need them to have different interfaces? That's a
bit more complicated. I guess you could rig something with netgraph
(ngctl and such), but I'm not familiar with it...
--
Daniel Nebdal
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Yasir hussan wrote:
> i want to have differ
Going by Zaphod's recommendation of using a /32 for each IP, how about this?
ifconfig arge0 inet 192.168.1.100/32
ifconfig arge0 alias 192.169.1.100/32
I wouldn't recommend 192.169, though - only 192.168.x.x is reserved
for private networks, and 192.169 is a valid IP-routable prefix,
assigned to
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
>>
>> Ok, that's weird. What does a simple "nslookup ftp.freebsd.org" give you?
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Mehm
Ok, that's weird. What does a simple "nslookup ftp.freebsd.org" give you?
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 27.02.13 12:23, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
>>
&g
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>
>
> On 27.02.13 12:23, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
>>
>> I think you're supposed to be automatically sent to the mirror that is
>> closest to you - for some value of "closest". If the mirror you're
gn that the problem is with your local mirror. :)
--
Daniel Nebdal
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
> Dear All ,
>
> I have installed
>
> https://pub.allbsd.org/FreeBSD-snapshots/amd64-amd64/10.0-HEAD-r247266-JPSNAP
>
> with a very nice steps flow an
end any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I'm not familiar with NanoBSD, but does it do the package builds for
you - or do you do those by hand?
If it's the latter, I don't quite understand how the compiler is
supposed to know the target CPUTYPE?
--
Daniel Nebdal
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
That looks like a slightly different issue, though?
r246855 built for me last night, for what it's worth - though I'm not
sure if that was with -Werror.
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Michael Butler
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/15/1
Should be fixed as of r246853 (marked as "Add generated files", and it
seems to add the missing config.h and a few others).
--
Daniel Nebdal
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 8:34 PM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> Am 02/15/13 19:08, schrieb David Wolfskill:
>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at
Couldn't that just be because you're running a world that expects one
kernel but finds another? As far as I know, running a newer world in a jail
on an older system is not really recommended (while the opposite ought to
be ok)?
On Jun 16, 2012 11:33 AM, "Alexander Yerenkow" wrote:
> Hello all.
>
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:59:15AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
>>
>> Daniel Nebdal writes:
>> > >
>> > > In the case of gcc46, when I execute the previous six lines,
>> > >
; (Per a previous message, I have re-compiled libcmis with
> gcc42.)
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
> Robert Huff
Try with gmake instead?
--
Daniel Nebdal
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
on how much of an effect on user
software performance it has if you change the compiler for the
libraries in the base system? (I would guess "not massive", but this
is one of those things where some numbers wouldn't hurt).
Oh, and remember
included. Beware
the y-ranges. (To re-plot with a specific y range, add e.g.
"ylim=c(0,35)" to the boxplot() calls.)
http://nebdal.net/sched/plot.html
--
Daniel Nebdal
Dep. of genetics, Oslo University Hospital
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mail
_except_ the disk names, so ad4s1f = ada1s1f and so on. You'll have to
change most of your fstab, basically s/ad0/ada0/g and s/ad4/ada1/g .
That said, my one ad to ada transition was on a ZFS-only system, which
took the fstab editing out of it. I might be horribly wrong in some or
all
Looks like we have ATA in CAM now, so it's possible that the disk reset
>>> failed, etc...
>>
>> What are my options for saving the output from failed boot other than
>> handtyping it (no serial ports, no serial USB adapters)?
>
> None that I can think of :-(
We
ly agree with the majority - failing fast is a
feature, both to mess things up as little as possible, and to make
diagnostics and later fixing easier.
--
Daniel Nebdal
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
e gnome side of
things, so it just seems sensible to start with the really simple
things. Apologies if you've done this already. :)
--
Daniel Nebdal
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
uot; call. As for how that interacts with the sysctl,
uhm ... maybe also offering a time-since-last-reset could be useful?
--
Daniel Nebdal
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To uns
e
it would take more work for us, since I don't believe either of the
schedulers handles task groups in the required way. The linux patch
was just "create task groups automatically", since they already had
some suitable logic for scheduling based on task groups in their CFS
schedule
bserved CPU load over the same time period to get an
absolute CPU load number, and using that to pick a suitable P-state.
On a tangent, I wonder if you can get APERF>MPERF if you're using an
i5/i7 and their dynamic/automatic overclocking kicks in?
As for what to do with it, it sounds
ow it replaces libgcc ... but why is that such a good thing ?
>
> -Alex
The main thing is that it's BSD-licensed instead of GPL, I believe.
--
Daniel Nebdal
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
oth with and without compositing, Geforce GT240
cards. The mouse stops moving, no keyboard input does anything, it
doesn't answer on the network.)
I haven't had time to look at it, so I'm using the nv driver for now.
--
Daniel Nebdal
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
CFLAGS set.
As for version, err. I csup-ed the code on Sep 24, and VERSION is
'FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT amd64 900021' . How do you find the r-number
anyway?
I can grab today's version and see if it still works for me.
If it matters, the process was buildworld with gcc, installworld,
buildwo
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2010-08-17 15:03, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
>>>> However, a disadvantage is that the built-in search paths of the
>>>> bootstrap compiler are not entirely disabled by using the -isysroot, -B
>>>> and -L
This could be viewed as a bug ...
For clarification, did you (Dimitry, that is) mean
a) The paths are still there so they could resurface if some Makefile
doesn't specify those flags , or
b) they sometimes come into play even when using the app
best
comparison, but it reminds me of how SCHED_ULE was available but
mostly ignored until it was made default.
--
Daniel Nebdal
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send
54 matches
Mail list logo
