Re: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?)

On Wed, 2 Oct 2024, Dan Mack wrote: On Wed, 2 Oct 2024, Warner Losh wrote: Ack, okay.   I can't trigger it with a fresh or my /usr/obj but in any event the error number 6 is probably referring to a path or directory missing while doing a parallel build

Re: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?)

etching to make error no 6 work for me in this context by thinking it was really a mis identitied file or directory not found. However, if someone's going to return 6, then they'll return a 6, nothing I can do about it other than expect it again sometime. :-) Dan

Re: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?)

On Wed, 2 Oct 2024, dsdq...@hotmail.com wrote: Dan Mack wrote: On Wed, 2 Oct 2024, dsdq...@hotmail.com wrote: David Wolfskill wrote: I have been tracking stable/ and head (daily, with a few exceptions) for many years, now.  Over time, I set up a set of ([t]csh) aliases to simplify the

Re: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?)

mp;1 && \ make -j 8 kernel KERNCONF=GENERIC > /logs/bk.$$ 2>&1 && \ sync && reboot I grepped all my logs across 3 servers and did not see a single instance of [_cleanworldtmp] Error code ... in any of the logs. What was the hash of the build you were on there, I can try to reproduce it quickly (but it might only trigger with your builddir state I guess) Dan

Re: change in /usr/bin/bc with CTRL-d no longer exit

On Mon, 16 Sep 2024, Dennis Clarke wrote: On 9/16/24 10:13, Cy Schubert wrote: In message , void writes: On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 03:16:46PM -0500, Dan Mack wrote: On 14.1 and prior, a CTRL-d will exit a bc session. Today I noticed that on 3 different 15-CURRENT systems, it appears to

Re: change in /usr/bin/bc with CTRL-d no longer exit

On Sun, 15 Sep 2024, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 15 Sep 2024, at 22:35, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 03:16:46PM -0500, Dan Mack wrote: On 14.1 and prior, a CTRL-d will exit a bc session. Today I noticed that on 3 different 15-CURRENT systems, it appears to be ignored

change in /usr/bin/bc with CTRL-d no longer exit

le out any terminal madness. Here's a paste of what I see: https://tpaste.us/VYya I did a fresh install of 14.1 and it works as it did previously. No biggie, just wondering if anyone else on -CURRENT can confirm/deny this change on their system. Dan

documentation nit / TERMINFO in ncurses man pages

.ds d @TERMINFO@ Since this is also set in alot of other places, we probably need someone to make some sort of decision :-) Dan

Re: native recording of all network connections on freebsd

Thank you, Oh how dumb I am - I'll just have pf do it using 'log all'. Dan On Wed, 28 Dec 2022, Sami Halabi wrote: using firewall ike ipfw with rule to log any to any would be a start.. for advanced use, stateful fw so You can log start of connections ?? ??? ??, 28 ??

native recording of all network connections on freebsd

ats. Happy to RTFM as well, Dan

Outdated IX intel driver in /usr/src tree

22 d...@router.sunsaturn.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/MYKERNEL amd64 router:/usr/src/sys/modules # Standard Dell r720 server. Dan.

Re: dmesg content lifetime

On Tue, 22 Nov 2022, Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:12:28 -0600 (CST) Dan Mack wrote: It seems like dmesg content ages out over time. Is there a way to leave the contents based on a fixed memory size instead? Dan I think this is how it works: the kernel message bugger is

Re: dmesg content lifetime

my part. Also this is an older system so I'll probably look at it again after I update. Thank you, Dan On Tue, 22 Nov 2022, Warner Losh wrote: On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 8:13 AM Dan Mack wrote: It seems like dmesg content ages out over time. Is there a way to leave the contents bas

Re: vfs.zfs.vol.recursive hang makes it impossible to mount zvol

very organized especially if someone wanted to pass 10 devices through to a guest with a 1 liner to bhyve. I am not sure what is happening after resume, would be disheartening to have to go back to virtio-blk :( Think virtio-blk being phased out to virtio-scsi from what I have read. Dan. -

Re: vfs.zfs.vol.recursive hang makes it impossible to mount zvol

s 0:0,hostbridge \ -s 4:0,virtio-scsi,$STORAGE \ -s 5:0,virtio-net,$TAP \ -s 29,fbuf,tcp=$HOST:$PORT,w=$WIDTH,h=$HEIGHT \ -s 30,xhci,tablet \ -s 31,lpc -l com1,$SERIAL \ -l bootrom,/usr/local/share/uefi-firmware/BHYVE_UEFI.fd

vfs.zfs.vol.recursive hang makes it impossible to mount zvol

rt -fR /mnt testing This hangs forever The only way to import that pool from the zvol that I know of..... Dan -- Dan The Man CEO & Founder Websites, Domains and Everything else http://www.SunSaturn.com/aboutus.php Email: d...@sunsaturn.com PGP Key: https://SunSaturn.com/pgp.txt A1A7

Options for production testing under current(samba slow)

? Dan. -- Dan The Man CEO & Founder Websites, Domains and Everything else http://www.SunSaturn.com/aboutus.php Email: d...@sunsaturn.com PGP Key: https://SunSaturn.com/pgp.txt A1A7 6E84 FB0B 8994 C3B5 A1BA FF6F 4997 7311 C386

Re: Call for participation

Warner, Thank you for asking and I am interested. Regards, Dan On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 10:46 AM Warner Losh wrote: > Greetings, > > As teased on twitter, now that summer is over, it's a good time to start > working on the next steps with git. When we moved to git, we knew a n

Re: On 14-CURRENT: no ports options anymore?

If this isn’t at least in /usr/ports/UPDATING it sure should be. -Dan > On Mar 13, 2021, at 12:58 PM, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports > wrote: > > On 13/03/21 20:17, Hartmann, O. wrote: >> Since I moved on to 14-CURRENT, I face a very strange behaviour when trying >&g

Re: On 14-CURRENT: no ports options anymore?

test? Anyway, more on topic, it seems that if one is on -CURRENT (or possibly -STABLE), you’re building from source, and should be expected to read UPDATING. That much is on the site. (But that would be /usr/src, not /usr/ports). Did this happen mid-line in a stable? That…shouldn’t. -Dan &g

Re: src: continued use of Subversion for getting updates

it rev-parse --short HEAD` # make -j 8 buildkernel ... # reboot ... # cd /usr/src # make installworld # mergemaster -iFU /* need to start using an alt method for this */ # reboot works for me (tm) Dan ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailin

boot loader menu help missing "menu" option

chain load boot block from device ... vbe vesa framebuffer mode management OK The way you get back to the bestie menu is by typing "menu" but that option is not in the help "?" output. Just FYI - probably something simple no? This is on tip of

Re: boot loader blank screen

I've tried multiple rebuilds to no avail - what finally fixed it for me was to add this to /boot/loader.conf and rebooted: screen.textmode=1 I don't use X11 on this box but only had console access so needed the console to work :-) Works for me, your mileage may vary. Dan

Re: bug in motd service / documentation

On Sat, 17 Oct 2020, Dan Mack wrote: I've been away for a while and missed the change and complexity added to /etc/motd. I figured it out but I was led astray by not knowing that it was converted into a service that only runs at boot time. If you just follow the instructions i

bug in motd service / documentation

and also add an entry to the man page for motd. This was on: FreeBSD boxolox 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #1 r366790: Sat Oct 17 08:57:56 CDT 2020 Dan ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/ma

Re: Plans for git (was: Please check the current beta git conversions)

resending, because I clearly have no clue. On Wed, Sep 2, 2020, at 2:50 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 14:45 -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020, at 2:36 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > > Seriously, Warner? > > > > Yes, seriou

Re: Plans for git (was: Please check the current beta git conversions)

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020, at 2:50 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 14:45 -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020, at 2:36 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > > Seriously, Warner? > > > > Yes, seriously. We are adults. Act accordingly. > >

Re: Plans for git (was: Please check the current beta git conversions)

and > thinking "we don't need their contributions anyway, so let's just mock > them and move on." I don't think so. I'm guessing I'm older and more set in my ways. There are much better ways to communicate that in recent messages. -- Dan Langille d...@

Re: Devd / devmatch(8) -- netif race 12-RC1

functionality . It shows it’s age @Warner Could you tell me please if devmatcher supports taking over a PCI device which is attached by a generic driver already ? vga attaching modern GPUs comes to mind . Dan > On Nov 20, 2018, at 15:26, Bjoern A. Zeeb > wrote: > > On 20 Nov 2

Devd / devmatch(8) -- netif race 12-RC1

Hello, Today I tried a simple wireless failover on a machine running free-bsd. After reboot the system cannot complete the initialization sequence OK with devmatcher. The devd/devmatch(8) combo correctly identified the wireless card and loaded required drivers and firmware. rcorder(8) reports

Re: cannot access pass device from within jail

securelevel_gt:return int 0x1 In the jail: mtx -f /dev/pass7 status Based on the dtrace output, I again checked securelevel in the jail: [dan@bacula-sd-02] $ sysctl kern.securelevel kern.securelevel: 2 WTF? I'd already checked that as seen at https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sc

Re: cannot access pass device from within jail

oked at that code path yet, buy you can see if it's > making it to passopen() with dtrace and checking its return value. I don't > see anything in how we register the device, though, that would suggest > filtering it in jails. > > Warner > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:

Re: cannot access pass device from within jail

> On Dec 17, 2017, at 3:37 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 02:52:12PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >> Hello, >> >> What suggestions do you have for where I should look next? I'm happy to >> start installing various builds o

Re: cannot access pass device from within jail

> On Dec 17, 2017, at 3:37 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb > wrote: > > On 17 Dec 2017, at 19:52, Dan Langille wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> What suggestions do you have for where I should look next? I'm happy to >> start installing various builds of FreeBSD in orde

cannot access pass device from within jail

#x27;/dev/pass7' - Operation not permitted Here is the truss output of the command in question: https://gist.github.com/dlangille/b80ee804b8080e1cbf5b5ab67f0bdabe Thank you. -- Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon d...@langille.org ___ freebsd-current@free

Re: can't link against math.h

% man 3 exp | NAME | exp, expf, expl, exp2, exp2f, exp2l, expm1, expm1f, expm1l, pow, powf, | powl - exponential and power functions gives a good summary as well. Dan Steve Kargl writes: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:05:00AM +0800, blubee blubeeme wrote: >> I wrote a si

Re: fixes for stack clash vulnerability

Thanks Jov - I missed it! Looks like it will MFC around Saturday :-) Dan On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Jov wrote: There is a commit fix this: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/320317 Jov 2017年6月28日 10:27 PM，"Dan Mack" 写道： FreeBSD is mentioned as being vulnerable to this and Q

fixes for stack clash vulnerability

FreeBSD is mentioned as being vulnerable to this and Qualsys has working exploits which might be released soon: https://blog.qualys.com/securitylabs/2017/06/19/the-stack-clash I don't remember seeing an advisory or seeing any fixes on the svn commit stream so just curious.

Re: AR8327 Etherswitch led control patch

The patch has also been filed as https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211462 . - Original Message - From: Dan Nelson To: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2016 1:11 AM Subject: AR8327 Etherswitch led control patch I got a TP-Link WDR430

AR8327 Etherswitch led control patch

o apply easily to other etherswitch chips. Comments and suggestions welcome. -- Dan Nelson dnelson_1...@yahoo.com Index: sbin/etherswitchcfg/etherswitchcfg.8 === --- sbin/etherswitchcfg/etherswitchcfg.8(revision 3

Re: Followup on packaging base with pkg(8)

Thanks for the work you put in this major feature. Could we please get a full list of the issues which surfaced, quirks, and other worth to mention notes ? I believe its important. > On 19 May 2016, at 23:31, Glen Barber wrote: > > Despite the schedule adjustment for 11.0-RELEASE to allow ad

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

>> > > *THAT* is the tone I was complaining about. This is not at all respectful. > Respect is a two way street. If you want respect, offer yours. We make our point very poorly, I get you, but it is the result of what you and others from the projectdo. Meaning, 0 communication. I dont k

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

left there do become annoying. > On 21 Apr 2016, at 23:20, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: > > On 0421T1526, Dan Partelly wrote: >> The scenario is: >> >> Let’s say I have autofs_enable , working with media map. >> >> If I have a CD in CD drive , all

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

The scenario is: Let’s say I have autofs_enable , working with media map. If I have a CD in CD drive , all is well and when the system is fully booted up /media contains a directory through which I can access the content of the CD-ROM. Now if you eject this CD , and insert a new one, nothing hap

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

IMO, the number of packages per-se is not a problem as long as you can manage them without arcane commands, aliases, pipe - filters, or scripts. (they all have their place, but less , the better) My point is that I don't really want to keep on my head a Unix hacker hat. I (and presumably many

Re: CVE-2015-7547: critical bug in libc

. - *sigh* - if the cross over use is common via a port, then have the port maybe remind users to consult their distribution specific security vulnerabilites prior to running it maybe - which is what they should be doing anyway. That's my two insignificant cents :-)

Re: DDB patches

de: > eventually we may decide to bring it in … You tell me nothing new, but thank you. > On 20 Nov 2015, at 17:56, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > > > On 11/20/15 08:54, Dan Partelly wrote: >> Hi Pedro, >> >> I think you confuse blackmailing with something much

Re: DDB patches

walk > away as soon as he/she receives criticism or has plans that do not match ours. > If this is not your ideal workflow … fork your own BSD, a lot of intelligent > people do just that. > > Pedro. > >> >> Dan >> >> >> >>> On 19

Re: DDB patches

to the project. > On 19 Nov 2015, at 16:10, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > > On 19-11-2015 14:53, Dan Partelly wrote: >>> So not submitting a PR for an issue sound real strange to my ears. >> >> >> It is NOT a patch for an issue, bug, anything on those lines at

Re: DDB patches

e added to a problem database which is used for bug reports. But then again, it may be just me. Dan > On 19 Nov 2015, at 15:44, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > > On 19-11-2015 10:57, Dan Partelly wrote: >> Hey Pedro, >> >> Thanks a lot , mate. >> >> I

Re: DDB patches

this done one way or another , we could proceed to the libification of ifconfig, should you so desire, and you believe we can all benefit from it. Dan > On 19 Nov 2015, at 11:17, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > Hello; > >> Il giorno 19/nov/2015, alle ore 02:34, Dan Partelly

DDB patches

Hey Pedro, some times ago you got some DDB patches from me in which I added relational ops support from it. The patch was a bit clobbered, but last I know you cleaned it up and put it somewhere on freebsd.org (prolly your page) up for review. Could you or Adrian review the patch set , and if

Re: libXO-ification - Why - and is it a symptom of deeper issues?

add /usr.bin/uptime > On 18 Nov 2015, at 23:56, Ed Maste wrote: > > On 18 November 2015 at 15:46, Luigi Rizzo wrote: >> i was going to suggest doing ldd on the binaries or a grep on the >> Makefile but the latter returns a surprisingly low number >> of matches. > > That's because it's usually

Re: libXO-ification - Why - and is it a symptom of deeper issues?

describing arbitrary commands, , have the request validated, user right checked, then passed to a command execution system (and I use the command term very loosely, I do not refers to a utility) > On 17 Nov 2015, at 18:42, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > > Dan Partelly wrote: >> Juni

Re: libXO-ification - Why - and is it a symptom of deeper issues?

> On 17 Nov 2015, at 11:04, Julian Elischer > wrote: > > Personally I would have liked it if in '91 we had followed one very serious > suggestion, > and implemented every user command as a base 'library', and a tcl wrapper > script that gave the external behaviour.

Re: libXO-ification - Why - and is it a symptom of deeper issues?

daemon would help FreeBSD. I am very grateful your company helped us with libxo. Now you could help with the other end of the system. So Juniper, thank you for contributing, and please help the OS who makes us all tick. Dan > On 17 Nov 2015, at 00:02, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: >

Re: libXO-ification - Why - and is it a symptom of deeper issues?

. I personally am more interested in the part dealing with ethernet from ifconfig, but if you are willing to help/mentor and direct the effort maybe we can arrange something. How do you propose to proceed from here ? dan ___ freebsd-curre

Re: libXO-ification - Why - and is it a symptom of deeper issues?

t; > On 2015-11-15 14:44, Dan Partelly wrote: >>> I would welcome competing ideas/solutions, but someone would have to >>> actually build them, not just >> >>> rattle off some ideas on the mailing list. >> >> Am I missing the point of a mailing list

Re: libXO-ification - Why - and is it a symptom of deeper issues?

hy of the status of a FreeBSD initiated and sponsored object. > On 16 Nov 2015, at 19:16, Allan Jude wrote: > > On 2015-11-16 12:09, Elizabeth Myers wrote: >> On 15/11/15 06:54, Dan Partelly wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I was looking at the new facili

Re: libXO-ification - Why - and is it a symptom of deeper issues?

> It's all fine and good making technical decisions based on drawings > and handwaving and philosophizing, but at some point someone has to do > the code. HI Adrian, . What I eluded too is not a small project. It is something that would need proper discussion and agreement, since it would be per

Re: libXO-ification - Why - and is it a symptom of deeper issues?

HI Simon, Thanks for the write-up . One question: >> The ability to get machine parsable output from OS components is a big part >> of the success of Junos CLI, netconf etc. Once you get machine parsable output, and feed it to your GUIs , WEB, other tools, and modify it, how do you feed it

Re: libXO-ification - Why - and is it a symptom of deeper issues?

> I would welcome competing ideas/solutions, but someone would have to actually > build them, not just > rattle off some ideas on the mailing list. Am I missing the point of a mailing list ? it is a place to present and exchange ideas, ask why some things are the way they are , and get critici

Re: libXO-ification - Why - and is it a symptom of deeper issues?

Meaning, is that simple to push things in head , if somone does the work, even with with no proper review of the problem at hand , and the proposed solutions ? > On 15 Nov 2015, at 19:05, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > Hi, > > The reason is simple - someone offered to do the work and push it throu

Re: libXO-ification - Why - and is it a symptom of deeper issues?

Nov 2015, at 15:10, Yonas Yanfa wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > Sounds like you'd be interested in NextBSD: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NextBSD > > Cheers, > Yonas > > > > > Yonas Yanfa > In Love With Open Source > Drupal <http:/

libXO-ification - Why - and is it a symptom of deeper issues?

Hi all, I was looking at the new facility of dumping JSON,XML from many utils in base and after some funny minutes, I couldn't stop ask myself “ Ok, this is funny , but why ? “ And I couldn't find a real answer. Ill outline what I think: 1. Undoubtedly, it makes base code slightly harder to u

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

> On Mar 2, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:43:15 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >> >>> On Mar 1, 2015, at 9:06 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:40:40 -0500, Dan Langille wro

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

> On Mar 2, 2015, at 4:42 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 16:34:34 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >> >>> On Mar 2, 2015, at 2:47 PM, Dan Langille wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Mar 2, 2015, at 2:07 PM, Dan Langille wrote: &g

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

> On Mar 2, 2015, at 2:47 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > > >> On Mar 2, 2015, at 2:07 PM, Dan Langille wrote: >> >> >>> On Mar 2, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:44:09 -0500, Dan Langille wro

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

> On Mar 2, 2015, at 2:07 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > > >> On Mar 2, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:44:09 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >>> >>>> On Mar 2, 2015, at 11:31 AM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: &

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

> On Mar 2, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:44:09 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >> >>> On Mar 2, 2015, at 11:31 AM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:09:57 -0500, Dan Langille wro

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

> On Mar 1, 2015, at 9:06 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:40:40 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >> >>> On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:28:37 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >&

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

stuff \ > as a userspace (fuse) filesystem > I'd hope it's much the same with BSD. Removing the standard interface would > be \ > counterproductive overall Can you answer that and I'll relay please? — Dan Langille http://langille.org/

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

> On Mar 2, 2015, at 11:31 AM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:09:57 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >> >>> On Mar 1, 2015, at 9:29 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:41:07 -0500, Dan Langille wro

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

> On Mar 1, 2015, at 9:29 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:41:07 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >> >>> On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:15:05 -0500, Dan Langille wrot

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

> On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:15:05 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >> >>> On Feb 17, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 18:22:43 -0500, Dan Langille wrot

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

> On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 19:28:37 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >> >>> On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:18 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 17:06:24 -0500, Dan Langille wrot

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

> On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:18 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 17:06:24 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >> >>> On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >>> >>> >>> I have a fairly large set of changes to the sa(

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

> On Feb 17, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 18:22:43 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >> >>> On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >>> >>> >>> I have a fairly large set of changes to the sa(

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

e MTIOCEXTLOCATE > ioctl, and allows the user to change the logical position > of the tape drive in a number of ways. (Partition, > block number, file number, set mark number, end of data.) > The immediate bit and the explicit address bits are > impl

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

> On Feb 28, 2015, at 6:42 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > >> On Feb 28, 2015, at 6:15 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 17:29:48 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >>> >>>> On Feb 18, 2015, at 7:13 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wr

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

> On Feb 28, 2015, at 6:15 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > >> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 17:29:48 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >> >>> On Feb 18, 2015, at 7:13 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >>> >>> >>> I have updated the patches. >>> >

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

changes are in there from about 5 days ago. Having solved my server hardware issues, I'm now having issues with the autochanger mechanism of the tape library. — Dan Langille http://langille.org/ ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

> On Feb 28, 2015, at 11:48 AM, Dan Langille wrote: > > >> On Feb 18, 2015, at 7:13 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >> >> >> I have updated the patches. >> >> I have removed the XPT_DEV_ADVINFO changes from the patches to head, since >> I c

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

eatures and subcommands. >> >> usr.bin/mt/mt.c: >> Implement support for mt(1) subcommands that need to >> use getopt(3) for their arguments. >> >> Implement a new 'mt status' command to replace the old >> 'mt status&#

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

> On Feb 28, 2015, at 1:47 AM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 17:56:42 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >> >>> On Feb 17, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 18:22:43 -0500, Dan Langille wrot

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

> On Feb 17, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 18:22:43 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >> >>> On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >>> >>> >>> I have a fairly large set of changes to the sa(

Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test

sting it via Bacula. disclosure: I'm the sysutils/bacula-* maintainer and a Bacula committer. I'll let the other Bacula devs know about this. They deal with the hardware. I work on PostgreSQL. — Dan Langille http://langille.org/ ___ freeb

Re: [ZFS][PANIC] Solaris Assert/zio.c:2548

till at the db> prompt if you'd like me to attempt to collect more info. dan -- Dan Mack ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ZFS][PANIC] Solaris Assert/zio.c:2548

On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, Steven Hartland wrote: - Original Message - From: "Dan Mack" I think I may have hit the same problem; I'm going to stay connected to the console and see if it happens again; this is what I see currently with the back-trace: db> bt Tracing p

Re: [ZFS][PANIC] Solaris Assert/zio.c:2548

0 fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0xfe085ef1dab0 --- trap 0, rip = 0, rsp = 0xfe085ef1db70, rbp = 0 --- I just updated to I think 268921 earlier today and this is the first time I've had a panic (HEAD-268921 that is) I'll try to get some more

build failure on 10-stable

nf' '/usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC' config: Error: device "vt_efifb" is unknown config: 1 errors *** [buildkernel] Error code 1 make[1]: stopped in /usr/src 1 error make[1]: stopped in /usr/src *** [buildkernel] Error code 2 make: stopped in /usr/src 1 error m

LOR / ZFS on current 266923

gpt/larc5ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors Hope this helps, dan -- Dan Mack ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to

zdb -m : Assertion failed: (tq->tq_freelist != NULL)

0801912b95 in system_taskq_fini () from /lib/libzpool.so.2 #5 0x00080191495e in kernel_fini () from /lib/libzpool.so.2 #6 0x0040874f in ?? () #7 0x004050bf in ?? () #8 0x000800631000 in ?? () #9 0x in ?? () (gdb) Let me know if I can help by providing any more info

Re: Supermicro X10SLH-F motherboard kernel panics with 9.2 Release and 10.0 RC4

On 1/7/2014 6:26 PM, Allan Jude wrote: On 2014-01-07 15:05, Dan Sency wrote: Hello Everyone, I need help resolving kernel panics on a Supermicro X10SLH-F motherboard in a Supermicro SC-825 chassis. I originally installed FreeBSD 9.2 Release/amd64 but kept having kernel panics after varying

Supermicro X10SLH-F motherboard kernel panics with 9.2 Release and 10.0 RC4

lace. Tell me where to go and I'll bother someone else. Thanks, Dan. -- The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cur

Re: ZFS command can block the whole ZFS subsystem!

, so you're probably going to have to do at least one disk seek (probably more, since you're writing to the DDT as well) per block in the file you're deleting. You should probably have 16GB or more RAM, and use an SSD as a L2ARC device as well. -- Dan Nelson

Re: Witness message about lock order reversal on 10 (head)

LF64, sys_mkdir), rip = 0x800931e9a, rsp = 0x7fffd898, rbp = 0x7fffd970 --- ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@

Re: ZFS Crashes

I'm running zfs on a few systems with recent builds; which version of current were you last stable on ... if you can recall? FWIW I'm so far pretty stable on 254187 (on two systems) and also on r253918 Dan On Sun, 11 Aug 2013, Larry Rosenman wrote: In the last 12 hours I'v

Re: nanobsd-built system doesn't have SVN revision in "uname" (and it looks like regression)

Yeah, I agree with avoiding the 'cd' as well. I'll give it a try shortly. Dan On Sun, 11 Aug 2013, Glen Barber wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 08:25:42AM -0500, Dan Mack wrote: There's still one problem left ... the svnliteversion test fails because you are not in t

Re: nanobsd-built system doesn't have SVN revision in "uname" (and it looks like regression)

}/conf && /usr/bin/svnliteversion $(basename ${0}) >/dev/null 2>&1 if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then svnversion=/usr/bin/svnliteversion else On Sat, 10 Aug 2013, Glen Barber wrote: On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 02:11:52PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 01:09

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >