Re: if_clone.c allows creating multiple interfaces with the same name

2011-11-29 Thread Daan Vreeken
Hi Glebius, On Tuesday 29 November 2011 15:28:42 Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Daan, > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 01:07:13AM +0100, Daan Vreeken wrote: > D> Thanks for the looking into this and for your quick commit. I like your > D> twist on the patch with the move from the unit

Re: if_clone.c allows creating multiple interfaces with the same name

2011-11-28 Thread Daan Vreeken
Hi Glebius, On Friday 25 November 2011 15:32:58 Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 05:19:35PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > T> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:28:51AM +0100, Daan Vreeken wrote: > T> D> Recently I've discovered a bug in if_clone.c and if.c where

if_clone.c allows creating multiple interfaces with the same name

2011-11-24 Thread Daan Vreeken
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=162789 Could anyone take a look at it? Regards, -- Daan Vreeken Vitsch Electronics http://Vitsch.nl tel: +31-(0)40-7113051 / +31-(0)6-46210825 KvK nr: 17174380 ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing

if_tap VIMAGE support

2011-07-06 Thread Daan Vreeken
Hi all, I have been experimenting with a VIMAGE kernel and noticed that it can be panic()'d by opening and closing an if_tap device. I've submitted a PR with a possible patch as kern/158686 . Could anyone have a look at it? Thanks, -- Daan Vreeken Vitsch Electronics http://Vitsch.n

Re: Interrupt storm with MSI in combination with em1

2011-05-06 Thread Daan Vreeken
Hi Jack, On Friday 06 May 2011 17:36:52 Jack Vogel wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Daan Vreeken wrote: > > Hi Steven, > > > > On Friday 06 May 2011 17:20:15 Steven Hartland wrote: > > > From: "Daan Vreeken" > > > > > > >

Re: Interrupt storm with MSI in combination with em1

2011-05-06 Thread Daan Vreeken
Hi Steven, On Friday 06 May 2011 17:20:15 Steven Hartland wrote: > From: "Daan Vreeken" > > > # vmstat -i > > interrupt total rate > > irq3: uart1 917384 63 > > --> irq16: ehci0

Re: Interrupt storm with MSI in combination with em1

2011-05-06 Thread Daan Vreeken
On Thursday 05 May 2011 22:22:15 Jack Vogel wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Daan Vreeken wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > On Thursday 05 May 2011 21:28:02 Peter Jeremy wrote: > > > On 2011-May-05 13:22:59 +0200, Daan Vreeken wrote: > > > >Not yet.

Re: Interrupt storm with MSI in combination with em1

2011-05-05 Thread Daan Vreeken
Hi Peter, On Thursday 05 May 2011 21:28:02 Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2011-May-05 13:22:59 +0200, Daan Vreeken wrote: > >Not yet. I'll reboot the machine later today when I have physical access > > to it to check the BIOS version. I'll keep you informed as soon as I ge

Re: Interrupt storm with MSI in combination with em1

2011-05-05 Thread Daan Vreeken
g like that on your motherboard? Not yet. I'll reboot the machine later today when I have physical access to it to check the BIOS version. I'll keep you informed as soon as I get another storm going. > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Daan Vreeken wrote: > > On Thursday 05

Re: Interrupt storm with MSI in combination with em1

2011-05-04 Thread Daan Vreeken
On Thursday 05 May 2011 00:15:43 you wrote: > This all looks completely kosher, what IRQ is the storm on?? IRQ 16. Further down this email there is a list of devices that share the IRQ according to 'dmesg'. > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Daan Vreeken wrote: > > Hi, &

Re: Interrupt storm with MSI in combination with em1

2011-05-04 Thread Daan Vreeken
27;t always start directly at boot. I haven't been able (yet) to pinpoint what's triggering it to start. > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Daan Vreeken wrote: > > Hi Jack, > > > > Wednesday 04 May 2011 19:46:05 Jack Vogel wrote: > > > Who makes your moth

Re: Interrupt storm with MSI in combination with em1

2011-05-04 Thread Daan Vreeken
mstat -i" > > output. > > > > As only 'em0' and 'em1' seem to be using MSI interrupts, my guess is that > > the > > e1000 driver is causing this problem. Could it be that the driver forgets > > to > > clear/mask legacy interrupt

Interrupt storm with MSI in combination with em1

2011-05-04 Thread Daan Vreeken
interrupts perhaps? Any tips on how to debug and/or fix this? The full output of "dmesg" can be found here : http://vehosting.nl/pub_diffs/dmesg_plantje2_2011_05_04.txt And the full output of "pciconf -lv" is here : http://vehosting.nl/pub_diffs/pciconf_p

Re: Panic with ugen

2003-11-27 Thread Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN]
On Thursday 27 November 2003 15:33, Jay Cornwall wrote: > Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN] wrote: > > If you have time left, could you perhaps also have a look at kern/51186? > > I have filed it back in March and it's still open. (Fixes a memory > > corruption bug in ugen). &g

Re: Panic with ugen

2003-11-27 Thread Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN]
On Thursday 27 November 2003 01:08, Jay Cornwall wrote: > > It looks like this: > > > > panic() > > destroy_dev() > > ugen_destroy_devnodes() > > ugen_set_config() > > Yes, that's the one, and I think I can see why. The existing code fixed > devfs problems for normal ugen_set_config calls, but does