atapicam still failing (9/8/03)

2003-09-08 Thread Conrad Sabatier
: unknown transfer phase Rebooting the old kernel, rebuilding a new kernel without atapicam or any of the SCSI devices cured the problem. -- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - "In Unix veritas" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] m

jdk 1.4.1 exception trying to detect network interfaces (IP address)

2003-06-06 Thread Conrad Sabatier
ndler.java:68) at freenet.Ticker$Event.run(Ticker.java:229) at freenet.thread.FastThreadFactory$FThread.run(FastThreadFactory.java:97) What's strange is that the interface/address are working fine in freenet. Any ideas why this error? -- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROT

Re: viapropm doesnt like sys/dev/pci.c rev 1.214

2003-06-03 Thread Conrad Sabatier
g > the viapm driver loaded usually should please try the attached patch. I'm sorry to report that those patches didn't fix the problem for me. They all applied cleanly, I built a new kernel, but I still see the same messages at boot. Couldn't enable port mapping. Thanks anyw

viapm attach failure (was Re: loader vs PCI)

2003-06-01 Thread Conrad Sabatier
m0 attach returned 6 I have all the requisite devices configured into the kernel. I'm not sure what hint, if any, might help resolve this issue. Ideas? TIA - -- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - "In Unix veritas" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Fre

Re: So then, is fxp working OK again?

2003-04-05 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 05-Apr-2003 Conrad Sabatier wrote: > > On 05-Apr-2003 Maxime Henrion wrote: >> >> Could you post a complete stack trace? There's no fxp functions in this >> (incomplete) trace. Are you sure the problem you're having now is fxp >> related ? >

Re: So then, is fxp working OK again?

2003-04-05 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 05-Apr-2003 Maxime Henrion wrote: > Conrad Sabatier wrote: >> >> Still no go. I'm still getting a panic in bus_dmamem_alloc(). >> Here's the info I copied down by hand: >> >> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode >> fault virtu

Re: So then, is fxp working OK again?

2003-04-04 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 04-Apr-2003 Maxime Henrion wrote: > Conrad Sabatier wrote: >> Having had the same experiences as others described here recently with >> the >> fxp stuff, I'm just wondering if it's safe now to cvsup and try it >> again. >> I only have one mach

Re: So then, is fxp working OK again?

2003-04-04 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 04-Apr-2003 Wade Majors wrote: > Conrad Sabatier wrote: >> Having had the same experiences as others described here recently with >> the fxp stuff, I'm just wondering if it's safe now to cvsup and try it >> again. >> I only have one machine here and i

So then, is fxp working OK again?

2003-04-04 Thread Conrad Sabatier
Having had the same experiences as others described here recently with the fxp stuff, I'm just wondering if it's safe now to cvsup and try it again. I only have one machine here and if my net interface fails, I'm totally screwed. :-) -- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: playing mp3s and burning a cd

2003-03-24 Thread Conrad Sabatier
dworld, buildkernel. And, yes, it is *very* annoying. -- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - "In Unix veritas" To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

options VGA_NO_MODE_CHANGE causes buildkernel failure

2003-03-20 Thread Conrad Sabatier
:1331: warning: `filll_io' defined but not used ../../../dev/fb/vga.c:1321: warning: `fill' defined but not used *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/FOO. -- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - "In Unix veritas" To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTE

Re: panic on boot (devfs_find)

2003-03-15 Thread Conrad Sabatier
> strange... I just built a GENERIC kernel and it booted OK. Weird. > I may have some spare time to search for the break point later and will post > if I can find any commit that causes this. Thanks! -- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - "In Unix veritas"

Re: panic on boot (devfs_find)

2003-03-15 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 15-Mar-2003 Shizuka Kudo wrote: > > --- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Booting in verbose mode, I see the last thing that occurs just before the >> panic is mounting root and then starting (or trying to start) /sbin/init. >> After

Re: panic on boot (devfs_find)

2003-03-15 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 15-Mar-2003 Bryan Liesner wrote: > On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Conrad Sabatier wrote: > >> > Now, really, am I the only one experiencing this? >> >> No, you're not. I've been unable to get a bootable kernel running for the >> last few days also. >>

Re: panic on boot (devfs_find)

2003-03-14 Thread Conrad Sabatier
few days also. Booting in verbose mode, I see the last thing that occurs just before the panic is mounting root and then starting (or trying to start) /sbin/init. After an initial "hang", it drops into ddb. -- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - "In Unix veritas" T

Re: bash2 or devfs problem?

2003-03-11 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 10-Mar-2003 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Conrad Sabatier writes: >> >>diff <(cat file1) <(cat file2) >> >>errors out with: >> >>diff: /dev/fd/63: No such file or directory >>diff: /dev/fd/62: No such file or

bash2 or devfs problem?

2003-03-10 Thread Conrad Sabatier
the named pipes are not being created as they should. Is this a bash problem, or something in devfs not working as expected? -- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - "In Unix veritas" To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Compiling with high optimization?

2003-02-08 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 09-Feb-2003 Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Feb 08), Conrad Sabatier said: >> Call me a fool, but I've been using this for quite some time now, in both >> -stable (well, with slight modifications) and -current: >> >> CPUTYPE?=k7 >> >>

Re: Compiling with high optimization?

2003-02-08 Thread Conrad Sabatier
un-cse-after-loop \ -fexpensive-optimizations -fschedule-insns2 My -current box seems to be remarkably stable (and fast!). Guess I must be living right. :-) -- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - "In Unix veritas" To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: First time CURRENT user having problems with new boot loader install

2003-02-02 Thread Conrad Sabatier
ike ports, where "make install" will do all the prerequisite steps first. If you say "make install" in /usr/src/*, you'd better have already built something! :-) -- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - "In Unix veritas" To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: tunefs using libufs.

2003-01-28 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 28-Jan-2003 Juli Mallett wrote: > * De: Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-27 ] > [ Subjecte: Re: tunefs using libufs. ] >> I'm getting some odd behavior with tunefs (5.0-CURRENT cvsupped and built >> Sunday, Jan 26). If a filesystem, rat

Re: tunefs using libufs.

2003-01-27 Thread Conrad Sabatier
tions I'm using (an admittedly heavy set of flags)? Or might it be related to the recent changes the OP mentioned? On 18-Jan-2003 Juli Mallett wrote: > Can I get some tests of these changes to make tunefs use libufs? > > Thanx, > juli. -- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

VM_METER no longer defined?

2003-01-17 Thread Conrad Sabatier
Pardon me if I missed something, but what's become of the definition of VM_METER? It is nowhere to be found under /usr/include. This breaks a few ports, kdebase3 being one of the most notable. -- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - "In Unix veritas" To Unsubscribe

Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/sysctl sysctl.8 src/sys/kern init_main.c

2002-11-14 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 14-Nov-2002 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Was the following just swallowed up into the bowels of the CVS beast or >> something? :-) >> >> I've tried updating my sources several times, and still not retrieving

Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/sysctl sysctl.8 src/sys/kern init_main.c

2002-11-13 Thread Conrad Sabatier
Urgh, nevermind. I just noticed (in another of my mail folders) that the committer got jumped on over this one and, presumably, has already backed it out. Sorry, that makes two "neverminds" in one day. Shame on me. :-) On 14-Nov-2002 Conrad Sabatier wrote: > Was the following j

Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/sysctl sysctl.8 src/sys/kern init_main.c

2002-11-13 Thread Conrad Sabatier
> 1.215 +3 -0 src/sys/kern/init_main.c -- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: /dev/acd*t* no longer available in -current?

2002-11-13 Thread Conrad Sabatier
Please disregard. I discovered it was just that I was using single-digit track numbers (e.g., acd0t1), whereas leading-zero numbers were expected (e.g., acd0t01). Sorry 'bout that. :\ On 13-Nov-2002 Conrad Sabatier wrote: > I've been using a homemade CD ripping script under -sta

/dev/acd*t* no longer available in -current?

2002-11-13 Thread Conrad Sabatier
supported, that is)? Any info/help much appreciated. -- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/specfs spec_vnops.c

2002-11-04 Thread Conrad Sabatier
uot;We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power. > And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory." > - George W. Bush, President of the United States > State of the Union, January 28, 2002 > > Do

Re: Upgrading 4.7-stable to -current question

2002-11-02 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 03-Nov-2002 Ned Wolpert wrote: > On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 17:20, Conrad Sabatier wrote: >> Read the UPDATING file very carefully. You'll see that one of the steps >> in upgrading from 4.x to 5.0 is updating the boot blocks. > > Yes, there are several entries. 26

Re: Upgrading 4.7-stable to -current question

2002-11-02 Thread Conrad Sabatier
> tell) Read the UPDATING file very carefully. You'll see that one of the steps in upgrading from 4.x to 5.0 is updating the boot blocks. -- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Given the choice between accomplishing something and just lying around, I'd rather lie aroun

Re: speed of -CURRENT [was: questions about the state of current

2002-11-02 Thread Conrad Sabatier
s and comment it out. Let us know if that helps >> :) > > Yes, that's it. -CURRENT actually feels snappier than -STABLE now :) I have to agree. Until I did this, MP3 playback (using mpg123) was horribly choppy at times. Now it's running *much* smoother. -- Conrad Sabatier

Re: A few questions

2002-11-01 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 01-Nov-2002 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2002-10-31 18:39, Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [...] >> And finally, is there a simple way to ensure that none of the debugging >> code (including INVARIANTS stuff) is included during a buildworld? >

Re: A few questions

2002-11-01 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 01-Nov-2002 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 06:39:00PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote: >> I just upgraded a 4.7-STABLE box to current over the weekend. Went off >> very well, thanks to the great documentation in UPDATING. >> >> It's odd, though, t

Re: A few questions

2002-11-01 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 01-Nov-2002 Conrad Sabatier wrote: > I just upgraded a 4.7-STABLE box to current over the weekend. Went off > very well, thanks to the great documentation in UPDATING. > > It's odd, though, that after upgrading again just a few days later, > suddenly X (or perhaps just

A few questions

2002-10-31 Thread Conrad Sabatier
uildworld? It would be nice if there were a simple switch or environment variable to control this. Please forgive if this is all old stuff; I'm new with -current, and I have made a real effort to find the answers to this stuff myself. Thanks. -- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On

Re: Building aout ports in -current

2001-03-28 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 29-Mar-2001 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:20:33PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote: >> I've been notified that one of the ports I'm responsible for, xswallow, will >> no longer build under -current. Here's a snip from the build log: > >

Building aout ports in -current

2001-03-28 Thread Conrad Sabatier
edly, I did employ a rather "ad hoc" method to get this package to compile, and up until now it's worked just fine. Any info that might help will be greatly appreciated. -- Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Info needed re: new userconfig scripting and PnP

1999-10-26 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 25-Oct-99 Nik Clayton wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 02:10:03PM -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote: >> Someone just mailed me this heads up about my AWE soundcard setup >> tutorial at http://members.home.net/conrads/awepnp-freebsd.html. >> As this is the first I've hea

Nevermind! (Re: Info needed re: new userconfig scripting and PnP)

1999-10-25 Thread Conrad Sabatier
"you can disregard all of this information if you're running -current"), but who am I to stand in the way of progress, eh? :-) BTW, speaking of device IDs, if anyone needs the info for the AWE 64 "value" card, I'll be happy to provide whatever I can. -- Conrad Saba

Re: sound etc,

1999-10-24 Thread Conrad Sabatier
slightly inaccurate/out of date until recently. You may want to have another look and try it again, since I just updated it and (I think) the information there is now good (at least for less-than-current versions). -- Conrad Sabatier http://members.home.net/conrads/ To Unsubscribe: send mail

Info needed re: new userconfig scripting and PnP

1999-10-24 Thread Conrad Sabatier
27;d be most grateful. ------End of forwarded message- -- Conrad Sabatier http://members.home.net/conrads/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: ifq_maxlen problem...

1999-02-04 Thread Conrad Sabatier
you noticed similar messages??? > > The NIC is 3com 3c509B. Just cvsup'ed, made world and kernel today (Thursday, 2/4), and am seeing the same thing at bootup (on lo0; I have no network interfaces installed). No idea what it means or what's causing it, but it seems pretty harmles