Re: freebsd-update(8) without an echo of "You must be root to run this."

Hey, On 16 February 2021 08:53:29 GMT, Graham Perrin wrote: > > >         echo "You must be root to run this." > >Below: is this my PEBKAM, or (with a system that is preco

Re: bug with special bracket expressions in regular expressions

On 02/09/2013 16:09, Damian Weber wrote: On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, Andriy Gapon wrote: re_format(7) says: There are two special cases? of bracket expressions: the bracket expres? sions ?[[:<:]]? and ?[[:>:]]? match the null string at the beginning and end of a word respectively. A

Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default

On 14 Jul 2013, at 08:29, Teske, Devin wrote: > > To give you an idea as to just how helpful this is... > > Imagine the following hierarchy: > > src/pkgbase/depend/mystuff/script1 > src/pkgbase/depend/mystuff/textfile1 > src/pkgbase/depend/mystuff/sourcefile.c > src/pkgbase/depend/mystuff/Makefi

Re: RFC: swapon(8) vnode-backed md and gbde/geli encryption support

On 27 Jun 2013, at 09:06, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Hiroki Sato wrote > in <20130623.035356.644417021040610458@allbsd.org>: > > hr> Hi, > hr> > hr> I created a patchset to add support of automatic generation of > hr> vnode-backed md(4) devices and gbde/geli geom providers to swapon(8) > hr> v

Re: BSD sleep

On 29 May 2013 07:13, "Matthew Seaman" wrote: > > On 29/05/2013 05:59, Michael Sierchio wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Joshua Isom wrote: > > > > > >> You think it's trivial until you read this: > >> > >> http://infiniteundo.com/post/**25326999628/falsehoods-** > >> programmers-belie

Re: ipfilter(4) needs maintainer

On 19 Apr 2013 10:46, "David Demelier" wrote: > > 2013/4/14 Gary Palmer : > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 09:48:33AM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > >> Is it possible to move ipfilter into a port? > > > > That may work short term, but the ENOMAINTAINER problem will quickly creep > > up again as kernel AP

Re: ipfilter(4) needs maintainer

On 14 April 2013 16:48, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 14 Apr 2013, Chris Rees wrote: > >> On 14 April 2013 01:41, Rui Paulo wrote: >>> >>> 2013/04/13 16:01?Scott Long ??: >>> >>> >>>> Maybe something else, but whatever it is, it sh

Re: ipfilter(4) needs maintainer

On 14 April 2013 01:41, Rui Paulo wrote: > 2013/04/13 16:01、Scott Long のメッセージ: > >> Maybe something else, but whatever it is, it should be done. If you and >> Gleb don't want to do this, I will. > > I already started writing a guide. See here for a very incomplete version: > > http://people.fre

Re: Kernel is broken (at least for i386) from r246916

On 19 Feb 2013 16:45, "Lev Serebryakov" wrote: > > Hello, freebsd-current. > > > cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -march=geode -std=c99 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-e

Re: Is there an easy way to find out which port loads which library?

On 18 Feb 2013 18:42, "Jeffrey Bouquet" wrote: > > > > --- On Mon, 2/18/13, Chris Rees wrote: >> >> >> From: Chris Rees >> >> Subject: Re: Is there an easy way to find out which port loads which library? >> To: "Jeffrey Bouquet"

Re: Zpool surgery

On 27 Jan 2013 14:31, "Steven Hartland" wrote: > > - Original Message - From: "Ulrich Spörlein" > > >> I have a slight problem with transplanting a zpool, maybe this is not >> possible the way I like to do it, maybe I need to fuzz some >> identifiers... >> >> I want to transplant my old z

Re: LLVM 3.2: official stable port is still LLVM 3.1. Basesystem missing important LLVM pieces!

On 6 Jan 2013 14:57, "Dimitry Andric" wrote: > > On 2013-01-06 15:16, Erik Cederstrand wrote: > ... > >> I think the real problem is that LLVM and the related tools are build in one go, so you can't easily build llvm-config and others for the base version of LLVM. > > > Well, it would be easy enou

Re: Auditdistd user question

On 2 January 2013 14:04, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: > Hello there and please excuse my harshness. > > I just installed 9.1, and I tried to set up poudriere with 9/stable. > It took a lot of time compiling kernel and world, and after this it all > failed with message about missing auditdistd user. >

Re: ports/shells/bash upgrade to patch level 39

On 21 Dec 2012 20:50, "Garrett Cooper" wrote: > > On Dec 21, 2012, at 9:09 AM, Michael Zoon wrote: > > > Hi, > > I did update the make and distinfo file for a upgrade of bash 4.2.37 to > > 4.2.39 > > It is attached in this message. > > Could you please submit a PR for this and CC the maint

Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD git mirrors demoted to beta status, need your help

On 15 December 2012 13:22, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > Bad news everyone, > > tl;dr The git mirror of the source repository needs to be re-rolled to > make the conversion deterministically repeatable, this will change > pretty much all git commit hashes. > > The re-roll will be done January 15, 2013.

Re: Distributed audit daemon committed (was: svn commit: r243752 - in head: etc etc/defaults etc/mail etc/mtree etc/rc.d share/man/man4 usr.sbin usr.sbin/auditdistd (fwd))

On 2 Dec 2012 15:34, "Ryan Stone" wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > > Just to follow up on this thread, since the question has come up a number > > of times. "mergemaser -p" should be run prior to installworld always, but > > most of the time will do very li

Re: Distributed audit daemon committed (was: svn commit: r243752 - in head: etc etc/defaults etc/mail etc/mtree etc/rc.d share/man/man4 usr.sbin usr.sbin/auditdistd (fwd))

On 1 Dec 2012 21:51, "Andreas Tobler" wrote: > > On 01.12.12 16:15, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > Dear all: > > > > I've now committed the build glue required to install the recently merged > > Audit Distribution Daemon (auditdistd) contributed by the Pawel Dawidek, and > > sponsored by the FreeBSD

Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng

On 19 October 2012 16:16, Alex Keda wrote: > On 19.10.2012 19:10, Vincent Hoffman wrote: >> On 19/10/2012 15:39, Alex Keda wrote: >>> On 10.10.2012 17:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi all, If you are using the ports tree on a FreeBSD current setup, then you are concerned by the

Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th

On 11 Sep 2012 13:22, "Konstantin Belousov" wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 02:06:49PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > > > > tl;dr: Clang will become the default compiler for x86 architectures on 2012-11-04 > > > > > > There was a chorus of voices talking about ports already. My POV > > > is that

Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap

On 31 August 2012 16:47, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On 31-08-2012 14:22, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 08:10:50AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: >>> On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote: >>>

Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap

On 31 Aug 2012 13:15, "John Baldwin" wrote: > > On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote: > > > On 08/30/2012 07:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > On Thursday,

Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap

On 30 Aug 2012 18:03, "John Baldwin" wrote: > > On Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:39:17 am Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > On 27-08-2012 18:24, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Sunday, August 26, 2012 4:37:53 pm Doug Barton wrote: > > >> The problem is that we don't really support the idea of things in the >

RE: pkgng default release schedule (contd...)

On 24 Aug 2012 11:08, "Jeffrey Bouquet" wrote: > > A few more reasons (unless I have not seen some relevant documentation to the contrary) to not mandate pkgng as the default... Why don't you phrase this as "How can one ..." so you sound less negative? > Nowadays, one can save time by installing

Re: pkgng default schedule... registering a few reasons for rethinking the final implementation...

On 23 August 2012 20:50, Kris Moore wrote: > On 08/23/2012 13:10, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kris Moore wrote: >>> On 08/23/2012 12:26, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: I am following with dread the planned implementation of the deprecation of /var/db/pkg as a p

Re: pkgng default schedule... registering a few reasons for rethinking the final implementation...

On 23 Aug 2012 17:50, "Kris Moore" wrote: > > On 08/23/2012 12:26, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: > > I am following with dread the planned implementation of the deprecation of /var/db/pkg as a package registry... I use each /var/db/pkg directory as a database into the port installation/status, using sed/

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r239477 doesn't compile: virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.18_1 is marked as broken: Does not compile on FreeBSD < 8.2.

On 22 Aug 2012 19:38, "O. Hartmann" wrote: > > Am 08/22/12 16:02, schrieb Chris Rees: > > On 22 August 2012 14:32, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> On 08/22/12 15:05, Chris Rees wrote: > >>> On 22 August 2012 08:18, O. Hartmann wrote: > >>>> A

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r239477 doesn't compile: virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.18_1 is marked as broken: Does not compile on FreeBSD < 8.2.

On 22 August 2012 14:32, O. Hartmann wrote: > On 08/22/12 15:05, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 22 August 2012 08:18, O. Hartmann wrote: >>> Am 08/21/12 22:53, schrieb Bernhard Fröhlich: >>>> On Di., 21. Aug. 2012 13:56:02 CEST, O. Hartmann >>>> wrote:

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r239477 doesn't compile: virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.18_1 is marked as broken: Does not compile on FreeBSD < 8.2.

On 22 August 2012 08:18, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am 08/21/12 22:53, schrieb Bernhard Fröhlich: >> On Di., 21. Aug. 2012 13:56:02 CEST, O. Hartmann >> wrote: >> >>> Today I ran into a problem with FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r239477 >>> recompiling the VBox kernel module: >>> >>> ===> Cleaning for vir

Re: pkg and portmaster: Downgrading ports? Why? portmaster messes up ...

On 7 Aug 2012 15:50, "O. Hartmann" wrote: > > On 08/07/12 15:39, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > On 8/7/2012 4:31 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> ports-mgmt/portmaster installs still the old fashioned style folders of > >> ports in /var/db/pkg. I thought ith the new scheme of pkg, everything is > >> going in

Re: portmaster and pkgng

On 23 Jul 2012 09:44, "Hartmann, O." wrote: > > Hello. > > I'd like to try pkgng with portmaster. I see that "pkg2ng" is involving > the directory /var/db/pkg, so this implies that there may implications > also for usage with ports-mgmt/portmaster. portmaster is supposed to be > the tool completel

Re: [HEADSUP & CFT] pkg 1.0rc1 and schedule

On 13 July 2012 17:02, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 7/13/2012 10:36 AM, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 07/13/2012 05:26 AM, John Baldwin wrote: >>> On Thursday, July 12, 2012 5:16:41 pm Doug Barton wrote: On 07/12/2012 02:11 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > You might want to view Baptiste's pkgng pres

Re: Why NOT using FreeBSD? Re: ports/169581: editors/libreoffice:

On Jul 3, 2012 10:00 AM, "Hartmann, O." wrote: > > On 07/02/12 08:09, Sayetsky Anton wrote: > > I will test libreoffice build on 8.3-RELEASE today or tomorrow. > > I have both gstreamer and boost installed now. > > > > > We use FreeBSD 9.0STABLE and FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT (both amd64). > > devel/boo

Re: sysctl filesystem ?

On Jun 26, 2012 7:07 AM, "Wojciech Puchar" wrote: > > as well as we don't depend of /proc for normal operation we shouldn't for say /proc/sysctl > > improvements are welcome, better documentation is welcome, changes to what is OK - isn't. /proc/sysctl might be useful. Just because Linux uses it

Re: WAS: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? New: port annoyance LibreOffice

On 10 June 2012 18:10, O. Hartmann wrote: > On 06/10/12 17:43, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: >> On 06/10/12 09:54, Martin Sugioarto wrote: >>> Am Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:37:09 +0100 >>> schrieb Chris Rees: >>> >>>> Er... people always test their c

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?

On 10 June 2012 11:51, O. Hartmann wrote: > On 06/10/12 12:37, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 10 June 2012 11:12, Martin Sugioarto wrote: >>> Am Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:09:09 +0700 >>> schrieb Adam Strohl : >>> >>>> I get the feeling people are upd

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?

On 10 June 2012 11:12, Martin Sugioarto wrote: > Am Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:09:09 +0700 > schrieb Adam Strohl : > >> I get the feeling people are updating their ports tree and then >> recompiling/reinstalling everything "just because" and then are >> complaining when one thing breaks (its the only thi

Re: PORTS_MODULES fix

On 9 June 2012 18:15, Doug Barton wrote: > I have recently tried the PORTS_MODULES knob, and found a problem. The > ports tree searches for some dependencies by finding a binary in PATH, > and that fails since by default /usr/local/ isn't there. The attached > patch fixes that problem. > > It woul

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

On 6 June 2012 14:12, Erich wrote: > Hi, > > On 06 June 2012 8:48:10 Chris Rees wrote: >> On Jun 6, 2012 3:38 AM, "Erich" wrote: >> > > >> No it doesn't. It states clearly that you shouldn't use tags unless you >> know what you are doi

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

On 6 June 2012 14:48, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On 06 June 2012 9:21:22 Sean Cavanaugh wrote: >> >> Overall I see it as packages are flat stable at the cost of being out of >> date, and ports are current but not guaranteed to compile without >> intervention. The Maintainers do give a very g

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

On Jun 6, 2012 3:38 AM, "Erich" wrote: > > Hi, > > On 05 June 2012 7:13:47 Mark Linimon wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 03:23:01PM +0700, Erich wrote: > > > But is this true for apache only or for the whole ports tree? > > > > Entire tree. > > my problem with this is that the documentation stat

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

On 5 June 2012 09:25, Erich wrote: > Hi, > > On 05 June 2012 3:08:17 b. f. wrote: >> > On 05 June 2012 15:33:16 Mark Andrews wrote: >> > > >> > > In message <2490439.EC638TI0j3 at x220.ovitrap.com>, Erich writes: >> > > > Hi, >> > > > >> > All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is always

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

On Jun 5, 2012 3:07 AM, "Erich" wrote: > > Hi, > > On 05 June 2012 11:24:25 Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > > Version tagging is just a convient way to get a snapshot at a > > particular point in time unless you create branches that are them > > we do not ask for more. There should be only one differe

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

On 3 June 2012 21:55, O. Hartmann wrote: > On 06/03/12 15:29, Erich wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 03 June 2012 PM 5:14:10 Adam Strohl wrote: >>> On 6/3/2012 11:14, Erich wrote: What I really do not understand in this whole discussion is very simple. Is it just a few people who run into problem

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

On Jun 2, 2012 3:19 PM, "O. Hartmann" wrote: > > On 06/02/12 14:47, Daniel Kalchev wrote: > > > > > > On 02.06.12 15:32, Erich wrote: > >> I know that the ports tree is a moving target. But it stops moving > >> during the release period. This could be used to give a fall back > >> solution. > >> >

Re: OpenLDAP 2.4.31 on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 broken!

On 5 May 2012 16:55, "Hartmann, O." wrote: > > Hello lists. > > Since Friday, I have on all of our FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 boxes > massive trouble with net/openldap24-server (SASL enabled, so it is > openldap-sasl-server). > > Last time OpenLDAP worked was Thursday last week, when obviously a >

Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run?

On 28 Apr 2012 19:04, "Luke Dean" wrote: > > > > On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Chris Rees wrote: > >> On 30 Mar 2012 14:26, wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> However, if you always want to use tmpfs instead of stable storage, >>>> >>&

Re: [RFC] Un-staticise the toolchain

On 26 April 2012 20:15, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 26/04/2012 20:01, Chris Rees wrote: >> hydra# cd /usr/ports && time make MAKE=~crees/bin/make-static index >> >> Generating INDEX-9 - please wait.. Done. >> 729.770u 120.841s 7:45.10 182.8%        920+2676k

Re: [RFC] Un-staticise the toolchain

On Apr 26, 2012 2:42 PM, "Ruslan Ermilov" wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:35:48PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > I think it is time to stop building the toolchain static. I was told that > > original reasoning for static linking was the fear of loosing the ability > > to recompile if

Re: [RFC] Un-staticise the toolchain

Oops, just replied privately before: On Apr 26, 2012 12:39 PM, "Chris Rees" wrote: > > On Apr 26, 2012 10:36 AM, "Konstantin Belousov" > wrote: > > > > I think it is time to stop building the toolchain static. I was told that > > original reasoning

Re: xdm failing to start on FBSD 10.0 r2340030 erratically

On 9 Apr 2012 11:00, "O. Hartmann" wrote: > > Am 04/09/12 11:15, schrieb Anton Shterenlikht: > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:54:07AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> Am 04/08/12 17:29, schrieb David Wolfskill: > >>> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 01:29:36PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > I loose hair ...

Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run?

On 2 Apr 2012 16:47, "jb" wrote: > > jb gmail.com> writes: > > > ... > > Chuck Burns brea...@gmail.com > > 1:01 AM (16 hours ago) > > My experiences with using tmpfs as /tmp > -- > It works fine. until it doesn't. > > I've had mountpoints run out of space, checked df and the mountpoint had been >

Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run?

On 30 March 2012 19:36, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 30 March 2012 10:56, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 30 March 2012 17:31, C. P. Ghost wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:18 PM,   wrote: >>>>> > However, if you always want to use tmpfs instead of stable storag

Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run?

On 30 March 2012 17:31, C. P. Ghost wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:18 PM,   wrote: >>> > However, if you always want to use tmpfs instead of stable storage, >>> please do not.  Some people expect /tmp to be persistent.  This is why >>> /etc/defaults/rc.conf has clear_tmp_enable="NO".  Changing

Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run?

On 30 Mar 2012 14:26, wrote: > > > > However, if you always want to use tmpfs instead of stable storage, > > please do not. Some people expect /tmp to be persistent. This is why > > /etc/defaults/rc.conf has clear_tmp_enable="NO". Changing this would break > > the POLA. > > > > > This is a mist

Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run?

On 29 Mar 2012 16:49, "O. Hartmann" wrote: > > I was wondering if there are some objections using TMPFS for /tmp and > /var/run. > I figured out some problems with some rc.d scripts when using TMPFS for > /var/run, samba and OpenLDAP do store some informations like PID in a > subfolder of their ow

Re: hi-- looking for some help

On 19 March 2012 23:21, Iurie wrote: > hi > i saw your email inthe following link: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-August/026412.html > > im studying in portugal and in have acourse about pc networking. > there i have propossed to implement exactly the same thing as you h

Re: "rm -rf /" fanclub

On 6 March 2012 20:38, wrote: > Peter Maloney wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:41 PM, deeptech71 at gmail.com >> wrote: >> > X11R6 should be a symlink to local or ./local. >> >> Did you test this, by removing the link and creating it >> relative to see if there are any stupid side effects? >

Re: src.conf ignored; phantom named

On 2 March 2012 23:09, Yuri Pankov wrote: > On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 17:41:28 -0500, Rotate 13 wrote: > >> I set WITHOUT_BIND="yes" in /etc/src.conf, and built/installed world. >> Not only does /usr/sbin/named exist - named is actually started! >> Several other WITHOUT_* variables also were apparently i

Re: "/sys/conf/kmod.mk", line 111: Malformed conditional (${MK_CLANG_IS_CC}

On 3 March 2012 11:48, O. Hartmann wrote: > On one of my FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT boxes I receive this morning this > error message as shown below. > > I need to add, that I compiled the shown nvidia-driver hours ago on all > FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE boxes with the same settings and I compiled the > driver

Re: PEBKAC

On 26 February 2012 05:38, Super Bisquit wrote: > Both standard-supfile and kernel-supfile were edited to use the "." > tag along with the CVS server being cvsup.FreeBSDS.org; but, I'm still > getting the version error for config(8).  It seems to me that my > problem may be the base system is out

Re: print/ghostscript9: ./base/sjpx_openjpeg.c:169: error: too many arguments to function

On 13 Feb 2012 11:14, "O. Hartmann" wrote: > > This arise today when updating ghostscript9-9.04 to ghostscript9-9.05: > > > cc -DHAVE_MKSTEMP -DHAVE_FONTCONFIG -DHAVE_LIBIDN -DHAVE_SETLOCALE > -DHAVE_SSE2 -DHAVE_DBUS -O2 -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe > -march=native -fPIC -DUPD_SIGNAL

Re: Enhancing the user experience with tcsh

On 12 Feb 2012 18:22, "Chuck Swiger" wrote: > > On Feb 12, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > > So do I, but would these hurt you? > > At the present time, no. (At one point, I was using a keyboard > where the arrow keys generated "ESC-[ 1 ~" through &

Re: Enhancing the user experience with tcsh

On 12 Feb 2012 17:11, "Chuck Swiger" wrote: > > On Feb 11, 2012, at 11:05 PM, Gonzalo Nemmi wrote: > > Joel, with all due respect, do you really think that 99.9% of all > > users will not find the _non_intrusive_ additions below useful? > > > > bindkey "\e[1~" beginning-of-line #make Home key work

Re: Enhancing the user experience with tcsh

On 10 Feb 2012 19:41, "Alex Keda" wrote: > > On 10.02.2012 21:07, Chuck Burns wrote: >> >> set prompt = "[%n@%m]%c04%# " > > it's not needed > > need some as > alias ll ls -lAhG > alias ls ls -G Lscolors are an abomination. -F or nothing at all is better; remember some people wil

Re: Enhancing the user experience with tcsh

On 10 Feb 2012 14:58, "Erich Dollansky" wrote: > > Hi Eitan, > > On Friday 10 February 2012 21:03:52 Eitan Adler wrote: > > Picking a random person to reply to. > > > > There are a lot of good suggestions in this thread, but can we please > > remember a few things: > > > > - Users can always add t

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

2012/2/5 Radio młodych bandytów : > I wonder if I'm the only one thinking about a decentralised package > management > First, a decentralised transport layer. Torrents are faster and more > reliable than servers. > Second, decentralised management when anybody can upload a port directly > into

Re: HEADS UP: set_rcvar() removed from rc.subr

On 15 January 2012 08:11, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 15:30:15 + > Chris Rees wrote: > >> On 14 January 2012 15:16, Rainer Hurling wrote: >> > On 14.01.2012 10:05 (UTC+1), Doug Barton wrote: >> >> >> >> Howdy, >>

Re: HEADS UP: set_rcvar() removed from rc.subr

On 14 January 2012 15:16, Rainer Hurling wrote: > On 14.01.2012 10:05 (UTC+1), Doug Barton wrote: >> >> Howdy, >> >> Per discussion in freebsd-rc@, I have removed set_rcvar() from rc.subr. >> The concept of set_rcvar() was nice in theory, but the forks it creates >> are a drag on the startup proce

Re: HEADS UP: set_rcvar() removed from rc.subr

On 14 January 2012 11:11, Denny Lin wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 01:05:59AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: >> to make the change by hand, change this: >> >> name=foo >> rcvar=`set_rcvar` >> >> to: >> >> name=foo >> rcvar=foo_enable > > The scripts installed by net/avahi-app still use set_rcvar() be

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

On 9 January 2012 21:06, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: >>>>> On 9

Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current

On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: >>> On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >>> So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on >>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being "9.0 RELEASE" (with >

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On 23 Dec 2011 12:25, "O. Hartmann" wrote: > > Look at Steve Kargls problem. He investigated a SCHED_ULE problem in a > way that is far beyond enough! He gave tests, insights of his setup, bad > performance compared to SCHED_4BSD and what happend? We are still stuck > with this problem and more an

Re: Removal of sysinstall from HEAD and lack of a post-install configuration tool

On 29 Dec 2011 21:36, "Bruce Cran" wrote: > > On 29/12/2011 21:30, Chris Rees wrote: >> >> Nah, pkg_add -r works and grabs anything you need. Try it with something monstrous (like gcc...) > > > But then you have to know the exact name of the package, which

Re: Removal of sysinstall from HEAD and lack of a post-install configuration tool

On 29 December 2011 21:25, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > --- Gio 29/12/11, Chris Rees ha scritto: > >> > FWIW; >> > >> > I have practically given up on installing FreeBSD >> lately >> > and I mostly use PC-BSD. I mainly see two big issues: >> >

Re: Removal of sysinstall from HEAD and lack of a post-install configuration tool

On 29 December 2011 18:23, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > --- Gio 29/12/11, Nathan Whitehorn ha scritto: >> I'd appreciate any specific comments you might have, and >> especially >> specific suggestions for improvements. Except from people >> who are old >> hands at sysinstall, I've received almost univ

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On 15 Dec 2011 21:25, "Kevin Oberman" wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 15 December 2011 17:58, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> Since ZFS in Linux can only be achieved via FUSE (ad far as I know), it > >> is legitimate to com

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On 15 December 2011 17:58, O. Hartmann wrote: > Since ZFS in Linux can only be achieved via FUSE (ad far as I know), it > is legitimate to compare ZFS and ext4. It would be much more competetive > to compare Linux BTRFS and FreeBSD ZFS. > Er... does ext4 guarantee data integrity? You're not com

Re: CVS removal from the base

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/12/2011 14:30, Julian H. Stacey wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 8:03 PM, wrote: >> >>> I use CVS (or rather csup) to keep the base system up to date. >>> I would be perfectly okay with using a different utility - >>> however, I would strongly

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

On 2 Dec 2011 17:07, "Lyndon Nerenberg" wrote: >> >> Obsolete does not mean it doesn't work. > > > No, these days 'obsolete' seems to mean 'it does not have a sexy Flash-driven web GUI.' Straw man argument. This is irrelevant. > Profiling is a simple basic tool that makes it easy to quickly fin

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

On 2 Dec 2011 16:54, "Lyndon Nerenberg" wrote: >> >> Using profiled libs and gprof to profile your code has been obsolete >> in FreeBSD on i386 and amd64 for over six years now. > > > Funny, it still seems to work on my systems. > > I wonder if you're either not reading these emails properly or d

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

On 2 Dec 2011 15:57, "Lyndon Nerenberg" wrote: > > Max, I think a reasonable default is to continue building and shipping profiled libraries. This keeps FreeBSD consistent with every other UNIX variant released in the last (at least) 30 years. > > If you personally find profiled library builds sl

RE: Adding disk firmware programming capability to camcontrol

On 4 Nov 2011 16:33, "Pegasus Mc Cleaft" wrote: > > >> > >>To me, the only difference between borking a drive because of > >> bad firmware and typing "rm -rf *" from root is about £40. You still > >> lose at least a day rebuilding/restoring everything. > >> > > > >You clearly haven't boug

RE: Adding disk firmware programming capability to camcontrol

On 29 Oct 2011 00:38, "Pegasus Mc Cleaft" wrote: > > >> The linux hdparm program is so paranoid about this that you have to use > >> extra arguments like "--yes-really-destroy-my-disk-drive" to do this. > > > >I concur. Loudly. The ability to brick your hardware is just too > >large to not make p

Re: 10.0-CUR r226986 && ports (general)

On 3 Nov 2011 06:11, "Matthias Apitz" wrote: > > El día Wednesday, November 02, 2011 a las 08:36:07PM +0100, Matthias Apitz escribió: > > > > > Hello, > > > > I fetched 10-CUR from SVN as r226986 and /usr/ports from CVS on November > > 1st; > > > > The ports/audio/jack seems installing fine, but t

Re: cvs commit: ports/security/cyrus-sasl2 Makefile ports/security/cyrus-sasl2/files patch-plugins::gssapi.c

On 8 Oct 2011 20:34, "Michael Butler" wrote: > > On 10/07/11 19:48, Doug Barton wrote: >> >> In case anyone wants to take this on, this port fails to install on 10.0 >> because it uses its own version of libtool. I took a quick look but >> there wasn't a solution obvious enough for me. :) > > > Th

Re: ports on 10.0-CURRENT: r226027 is incorrect fix

On 8 Oct 2011 00:45, "Stanislav Sedov" wrote: > > On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 02:03:37 +0300 > Mykola Dzham mentioned: > > > Hi! > > r226027 fix ( ... s/freebsd1\*)/SHOULDNOTMATCHANYTHING1)/ ...) is > > incorrect: this commit breaks metaports building: > > > > # cd /usr/ports/print/teTeX && sudo make clea

Re: ports on 10.0-CURRENT: r226027 is incorrect fix

On 8 Oct 2011 00:45, "Stanislav Sedov" wrote: > > On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 02:03:37 +0300 > Mykola Dzham mentioned: > > > Hi! > > r226027 fix ( ... s/freebsd1\*)/SHOULDNOTMATCHANYTHING1)/ ...) is > > incorrect: this commit breaks metaports building: > > > > # cd /usr/ports/print/teTeX && sudo make clea

Re: FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 Available...

What is your Wiki name? On 4 Oct 2011 16:26, "Arnaud Lacombe" wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Ken Smith wrote: >>> >>> The third BETA build of the 9.0-RELEASE release cycle is now >>> available. Since this is t

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

On 27 September 2011 10:18, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:28:49AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: >> On 09/27/11 08:35, h h wrote: >> >Kevin Oberman  writes: >> > >> >>On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovett  wrote: >> >> >> >>>With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10

Re: 9.0 beta2 & the new bsdinstaller

On 25 September 2011 14:01, Fbsd8 wrote: > deeptec...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Fbsd8 wrote: >>> >>> 6. At the "Complete screen" when the reboot option is selected the >>> cd/dvd drive should automatically open so the install media can be >>> removed just like sysinstall does. If disc1.iso or dvd.iso

Re: Very imprecise watchdogd(8) timeout

On 18 Sep 2011 20:31, "Arnaud Lacombe" wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message < cacqu3mvf5mwqec+s9vkk4mljenmos9q_bjwkbyefzabfjo6...@mail.gmail.com> > > , Arnaud Lacombe writes: > > > >>I do not really care actually, but the manpage is wrong, an

Re: 9.0 bata2 & keymap

On 17 September 2011 22:42, Fbsd8 wrote: > Chris Rees wrote: >> >> On 17 Sep 2011 17:25, "Fbsd8" wrote: >>> >>> Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 09/15/11 14:57, Fbsd8 wrote: >>>>>>&g

Re: cvsup broken on amd64?

On 9 September 2011 06:33, Oliver Lehmann wrote: > > Mike Tancsa wrote: > >> Just curious as to why you need cvsup and not instead use csup that is >> in the base ? > > I got used to it in the past 12 years? But this is not realy the question. > If it is "BROKEN" it should be marked as BROKEN or

Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html

On 28 August 2011 19:47, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Sunday, August 28, 2011 a las 07:27:49PM +0100, Chris Rees escribió: > >> On 27 August 2011 20:32, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Hartmann, O. >> > wrote: >> >>

Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html

On 27 August 2011 20:32, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Hartmann, O. > wrote: >> This website should be brushed up or taken offline! >> It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days. >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html > > Agreed. Things have chan

Re: [rfc] replacing /boot/kernel.old with a unique directory name

On 13 August 2011 20:51, Alexander Best wrote: > hi there, > > i just had the following idea: how about instead of copying the current kernel > to /boot/kernel.old and then installing the new one under /boot/kernel as the > results of target installkernel, we create a unique directory name for the

Re: For about a week I've been trying to build a release that breaks at docproj. Just low priority break information.

On 13 August 2011 16:37, eculp wrote: > I've been building a release about once a week on current.  The last > successful build was on august 8 but don't know when this started but in the > last few days. > > I am building on > # uname -a > FreeBSD Home.EnContacto.net 9.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 #

Re: [clang] OpenOffice does not work with clang-compiled libgcc_s.so.1

On 27 July 2011 19:18, Chris Rees wrote: > On 27 July 2011 19:12, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 2011-07-27 12:19, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: >> ... >>> >>> So, if I compile the whole world (and kernel) with clang, soffice.bin >>> dumps core. If I recompi

Re: [clang] OpenOffice does not work with clang-compiled libgcc_s.so.1

On 27 July 2011 19:12, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2011-07-27 12:19, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: > ... >> >> So, if I compile the whole world (and kernel) with clang, soffice.bin >> dumps core. If I recompile the world with gcc and replace >> /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 >> with the new one, OpenOffice works fine

Re: ports/158179: some packages do not fully honor -P dir option in pkg_add(1)

On 16 Jul 2011 17:04, "Stephen Montgomery-Smith" wrote: > > On 07/16/2011 10:53 AM, Chris Rees wrote: >> >> >> On 16 Jul 2011 16:38, "Stephen Montgomery-Smith" > <mailto:step...@missouri.edu>> wrote: >> > For example, suppose the C

  1   2   >