Re: hotmail now running win2000

2000-08-08 Thread Brian Hechinger
Daniel O'Connor drunkenly mumbled... > > Personally I would wire something up to the reset switch instead.. > > Much less potential for accidentally nuking your hardware if your script is > broken and starts toggling machines on and off like mad.. > (much less violent on disk etc too) but how fe

Re: hotmail now running win2000

2000-08-08 Thread Brian Hechinger
Irwan Hadi drunkenly mumbled... > > Including MCSE, MCP , etc ? ;) :) bingo. > BTW how can the administrator of hotmail determine if a server is BSOD or > not then ?, because they have 2000 servers and I think without enough > employees to watch the system and how can APC master switch reboot

Re: hotmail now running win2000

2000-08-08 Thread Brian Hechinger
Irwan Hadi drunkenly mumbled... > > But I guess soon they will change all their freeBSD servers ;( > and I wonder, how many people should be employed by Microsoft, just to > press the restart button at their 2000 servers for Hotmail, in case they > got BSOD ? it's called the APC MasterSwitch (

Re: hotmail now running win2000

2000-08-08 Thread Brian Hechinger
Irwan Hadi drunkenly mumbled... > Sigh http://www.netcraft.com/whats/?host=www.hotmail.com not on all the machines however. re-run the query, sometimes you get: www.hotmail.com is running Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.8 SSLeay/0.9.0b on FreeBSD got both goin. just in case w2k didn't make t

Re: Worst case swapping.

2000-06-11 Thread Brian Hechinger
Kent Stewart drunkenly mumbled... > > Netscape reallys goes to pot in a hurry if you allow it to use more > than 1-2MB of memory cache. A friend was seeing a terrible response > and tracked it back to Netscape's memory cache. He had a lot of memory > and started out with something on the order of

Re: Anyone else seeing jumpy mice?

2000-05-21 Thread Brian Hechinger
Jonathan Hanna drunkenly mumbled... > > > I've seen it for the last few weeks and can only think that something > > must be stomping on the psm driver now (or the driver is missing > > interrupts for reasons of its own). Anyone else seeing this? > > Yes, recently on 4.0-stable, though provoked

Re: ColdFusion 4.5 RC3

2000-01-27 Thread Brian Hechinger
Josef Karthauser drunkenly mumbled... > > Is this ColdFusion for Linux? yes. sorry about the confusion, i forgot to mention that. Allaire off-record said that they aren't happy with Linux and are seeking an alternative. i seem to be pushing them towards FreeBSD. but, keep in mind, this will b

ColdFusion 4.5 RC3

2000-01-27 Thread Brian Hechinger
I can consistantly get ColdFusion 4.5 RC3 installed on FreeBSD-current. It will not work on -stable (i didn't really mess with it too much however) i haven't gotten the Apache module to work yet (but i haven't even looked at it, so give me time) instructions are at http://users.tmok.com/~wonk

passwords got smashed by make installworld

2000-01-21 Thread Brian Hechinger
i'm just reporting this, i have no real info, other than it happened. i installed the 2114 snapshot. SUPed -current, uhm, two days ago i think. did a make buildworld at that time. then yesterday evening i had a chance to reboot my machine so i did make installworld (as well as a new kernel

Re: Making sure /var/tmp/vi.recover exists during reboot

2000-01-14 Thread Brian Hechinger
Steve Kargl drunkenly mumbled... > > *sigh* > > man gcc > > Either use -pipe or set the environmental variable TMPDIR. ok, maybe i didn't say that right. this i know, i was trying to use gcc and vi.recovery as examples. but then my question is... why didn't you speak up earlier and save us

Re: Making sure /var/tmp/vi.recover exists during reboot

2000-01-14 Thread Brian Hechinger
7;t support that then fix cc since being able to specify where your compiler stores it's temp files is a Good Idea(TM) now cc is faster and vi.recovery isn't broken. maybe we should spend less time discussing the technical merits of an action and rather spend our time look for

make buildworld fails (yet another failure)

2000-01-13 Thread Brian Hechinger
i've read all the 'make buildworld fails' emessages on this list, but none of them have helped me. i tried the 'make b-m /usr/src/share/mk buildworld' and that fixes some problems, but i'm still getting hung up on this one. i'm upgrading from 3.4-stable to 4.0-current (in a vain attempt to get