My 3.4 machine at work has periodic problems with the
fxp. No performance issues (perhaps a little slow, but
the network is congested enough that this is hard to
measure). However it does periodically display an
error message about "PHYS" and "unsupported". I am
home right now, so I can't reprodu
I had similar problems with mod_ssl (for apache). And
once I completed that, getting it to install, and for
apache to recognize it...
Well, actually still working on it.
Apache tells me to configure ssl, I do, ssl tells me
to run "make certificate" on apache, and I do, apache
crashes then tells me
Do you know which version is shipping with FreeBSD 3.4?
Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote:
> +----[ Andrew Sherrod ]-
> | Guess ELM 2.4 isn't Y2K compliant. Not a huge problem, but annoying.
> |
> | FreeBSD:
> |
> | Received: from
Guess ELM 2.4 isn't Y2K compliant. Not a huge problem, but annoying.
FreeBSD:
Received: from cscfx.sytex.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [205.147.190.131])
by sytex2.sytex.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id LAA03024 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 11:57:16 -0500 (EST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mail
Appears the diff didn't get attached.
Here it is.
Sorry!
---Andrew Sherrod wrote:
>
>
> As I now have upgraded at last, I tested the 3.0
> version of the patch. It does appear to make the
> system recognize the proper disk geometry where the
> standard wd.c does not
x27;t compeltely
configured the kernel yet.)
Any thoughts on the patch?
Andrew Sherrod
---Andrew Sherrod wrote:
>
> I have found several people using IDE disks on newer Award BIOSes have
> trouble getting the boot-time probes and installation routines to recognize
> the corr
smaller than it actually is. (I don't make any claims about geometries being
reported as too large, or SCSI disks...)
Thanks to anyone who can help.
Andrew Sherrod
P.S. I know this is not a really big problem, but it always seemed a bit
insulting that FreeBSD had to rely on DOS boot secto
