On Fri, 30-Oct-2015 at 19:47:59 +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Not sure if it's the same issue, but it sure looks like it is.
>
> I have upgraded a couple of hosts (amd64) from 10.2-RELEASE-p5
> to 10.2-RELEASE-p6, i.e. the freebsd-upgrade essentially just
> replaced the /usr/sbin/ntpd with a new o
Yes, this is an old mail I am replying to ;-)
On Fri, 02-Dec-2005 at 18:42:37 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 06:16:48PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> >>> Do you mean that scripts without .sh runs in
> >>> the subshell and not damage main shell?
> >> Y
On Sun, 17-Nov-2002 at 17:20:56 -0500, John De Boskey wrote:
> In trying to setup a ccd on a -current system I
> seem to have run into a few issues:
>
> /etc/ccd.conf:
> # ccd ileave flags component devices
> ccd0 64 none/dev/ad1s1a /dev/ad2s1a
>
> # ccdconfig -g
On Mon, 11-Nov-2002 at 01:49:18 -0800, David Schultz wrote:
> Thus spake David Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I'm running into the same problems on a very light I/O load
> > (running /usr/bin/less on certain files triggers it). There's
> > also a timeout every time at bootup. I have included my
On Tue, 05-Nov-2002 at 14:22:41 -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> Andre Albsmeier wrote:
>
> > I would like to compile the whole base system (maybe even
> > the ports) without the whole setlocale stuff. Do you have
> > any ideas of how to do this easily?
>
>
> Repla
On Thu, 31-Oct-2002 at 10:54:55 -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> I agree with David Schultz that dynamically linking
> /bin and /sbin is playing with fire. I, too, have had
> ugly experiences on systems that did this:
> When /usr won't mount, it is not pleasant to be
> stuck with no tools. (Consider
On Thu, 28-Mar-2002 at 14:49:49 -0600, Scot W. Hetzel wrote:
> From: "Coleman Kane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Another thing to look at is the /usr/sbin/sendmail -> mailwrapper link
> that is
> > produced from installworld. In current it seems to have been linking that,
> even
>
> Stable creates the
On Wed, 27-Mar-2002 at 22:59:21 -0800, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
> andre.albsmeier> One thing I don't understand here (for the case someone
> andre.albsmeier> sets ${sendmail_enable} to NO):
>
> andre.albsmeier> Both, ${sendmail_outbound_enable} and
> andre.albsmeier> ${sendmail_submit_enable}
On Mon, 25-Mar-2002 at 23:58:23 -0800, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
> An issue came up on freebsd-stable today regarding the boot-time startup of
> sendmail for users who are using other MTAs. The end result was that users
> needed a way to completely prevent sendmail from trying to start at boot
On Wed, 28-Feb-2001 at 09:54:39 -0600, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> I"ve committed a fix for the problem where DNS hangs or takes
> a long time to resolve (the process gets stuck in kqread).
>
> In the last kqueue update, I added a new filter-specific flag to
> the read/write filters, which allows th
On Wed, 11-Oct-2000 at 15:05:28 +0200, Johan Karlsson wrote:
> At Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:53:10 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> >
> > Great, thanks. In my desperation I sent a PR for this: 21909
> > I think it can be closed then...
> >
> > -Andre
>
>
On Tue, 10-Oct-2000 at 22:39:06 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Stephen Hocking wrote:
>
> > Last one I can find in the FTP repository is cvs-cur.6772.gz. Where are the
> > more recent ones?
>
> I'm sorry, I have been recovering from recent surgery again, and just got
> back to
On Fri, 10-Dec-1999 at 13:16:16 -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 2:33 AM -0800 12/10/99, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >Can someone take a look at this?
> >
> >Basically, it makes the link to the file, if it can unlink the original
> >it will then chown the spool file if it can't delete or read th
On Thu, 09-Dec-1999 at 15:02:41 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > For better reference, here is the current patch:
> >
> > *** lpr.c.ORI Thu Dec 9 15:30:18 1999
> >
On Tue, 07-Dec-1999 at 14:55:37 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
I think the (really big) security hole can be closed by not doing
the chown/chmod commands. I inserted them because I wanted the
file in the spool directory to appear exactly as if lpr would
have copied it.
I am currently running the
On Tue, 16-Feb-1999 at 22:05:05 -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message
>
> Kris Kennaway writes:
> : runsocks works fine for me in socksifying the stuff I use it for
> : (FTP clients, simple TCP apps, etc). What are you having problems
> : with?
>
> I have verified that runsocks works with both
On Fri, 12-Feb-1999 at 00:04:08 +1030, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
>
> > Hmm, just finished my 3.1 upgrade, compiled socks and runsocks seems
> > to work now. The only thing that doesn't work is compiling the telnet
> > include
On Wed, 10-Feb-1999 at 17:01:00 +1030, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
>
> > 2.2.x for a while. (I have problems using runsocks from the socks5
> > package, but yet haven't figured out if it's my fault).
>
> runsocks works fine
On Wed, 10-Feb-1999 at 17:01:00 +1030, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
>
> > 2.2.x for a while. (I have problems using runsocks from the socks5
> > package, but yet haven't figured out if it's my fault).
>
> runsocks works fine
On Tue, 09-Feb-1999 at 17:00:15 -0700, John Galbraith wrote:
> > I meant "who's stopping you from committing the driver", not "who's
> > stopping you from committing the driver to 2.2". I too think 2.2
> > should be left to die in peace.
>
> Well, before it is committed I would like to see one
On Tue, 09-Feb-1999 at 14:04:55 -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> >
> > I would greatly appreciate to see this thing go into the tree. I
> > still have to build a measurement system in our lab (you remeber,
> > John :-)) and people there are talking about linux already :-(.
> >
> > Don't shoot me, but I
On Mon, 08-Feb-1999 at 17:44:33 -0700, John Galbraith wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
> > Steve Kargl writes:
> > > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > > I stumbled upon the (undocumented) gpib driver today [...]
> > > Actually, John Galbraith has written
> > > a better driver for the Nati
On Thu, 21-Jan-1999 at 10:54:36 -0500, David E. Cross wrote:
> I posted this awhile ago to -questions, but never received a reply.
>
> We have a number of FreeBSD NFS servers here. Occasionally we need to
> change the exports list on the servers and send mountd a SIGHUP. This
> leads to a condit
23 matches
Mail list logo
