On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:54:21AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> Sorry but telling experiences with non-Tyan boards don't help one bit.
> (too bad I don't have Bill Paul's finesse in getting this point across)
Actually, yes it does... well it's relevant in this case.
ATX systems respond to holdi
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 05:38:33PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Is the re ANYONE that uses wine on -current...?
Sure, I use wine on current. However, the problems I seem to be getting
are wine related and not due to problems with fbsd.. as far as I can tell.
- alex
_
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 05:45:10PM -0700, Scott M. Likens wrote:
> These issues have been addressed in KDE 3.1.3 if you're patient enough
> for Will to work out the kinks the ports will be updated in a week or
> less.
The issue is not KDE related one, rather the base c++ headers trigger all
sorts
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 07:52:00PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> OK, now that the latest 5.x package build is well underway, we can
> start work on fixing the compile failures seen with gcc 3.3.
What about stuff that breaks because the libstdc++ headers trip up gcc?
- alex
__
http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html returns a 403. Oops.
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Neither is devinfo.h. The attached patch should fix it.
- alex
--- devinfo.h.orig Wed Nov 6 13:03:22 2002
+++ devinfo.h Wed Nov 6 13:04:37 2002
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
* $FreeBSD: src/lib/libdevinfo/devinfo.h,v 1.4 2002/09/20 02:16:33 imp Exp $
*/
+#ifndef _DEVINFO_H
+#define _DEVIN
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 02:36:41PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> My understanding of his post was that, 6 months later, the machine
> unfreezes, and everything works normally... 8-) 8-).
>
> Actually, I think he's complaining that WINE isn't working in -current.
Yup. That's about right. Last
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 07:53:38PM -0700, Juli Mallett wrote:
> peter@ has been working busily in a Perforce branch to fix a lot of crap
> and it's by no means a small amount of work that he's done so far,
> especially taking into account the amount of testing and debugging he
> seems to be doing.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:33:53AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> And I want them to do it RSN: 5.0-R is only 9 days away.
If the release is only 9 days away, what will be done about the signal/FPU
register stuff? As it stands, [x]emacs still hangs often enough, and KDE
managed to destabilize
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 08:00:19AM -0700, walt wrote:
> Anyone else seeing this problem?
The only issue I have with emacs (I'm using xemacs 21.1.14) is that it
hangs quite often. Usually when I do a lot of mouse scrolling. This
seems to be a recent thing.
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 05:00:45PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > gcc's code optimizations are broken, and should be avoided.
>
> Not any more with GCC 3.2, unless you have a test case to prove it broken.
Well you still can't buildworld with "-O3 -march=pentiumpro
-fno-strength-reduce". Looks
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:03:54AM +0200, Daniel Rock wrote:
> But why don't show the same optimization levels on another intel
> platform (Solaris x86, gcc-3.2 release) no problem?
Because it's not the same compiler. -current is not using 3.2.
$gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Configured with: F
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 10:37:53PM +0200, Daniel Rock wrote:
> If I compile it with optimization enabled "make test" fails at t/op/pat,
> test 640. Only with no optimization at all this test succeeded. I tried
> the following options
So turn off the optimizations?
gcc's code optimizations are
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 10:17:01PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> FWIW: Thanks. It sometimes feels like people intentionally go
> out of their way to put Linux-isms (or whatever-isms) into code
> to make it not run on BSD platforms.
I'm quite suprised how this managed to avoid detection for so l
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 04:13:45PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Probably, this should be handled by sending a patch back to the KDE
> folks, whose servers were dead and being repaired yesterday. You
> could also make a port path that patched netdev.c, as an interim
> fix (include the header bef
(kgdb) bt
...
#9 0xc035c1a8 in calltrap () at /var/tmp//ccqYOobH.s:98
#10 0xc02302fb in panic (fmt=0x0) at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:494
#11 0xc033603a in uma_dbg_free (zone=0xc083a280, slab=0xc2356fe0,
item=0xc2356000) at ../../../vm/uma_dbg.c:273
#12 0xc03355a8 in uma_zfree_internal (zo
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 09:57:49PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> I've noticed netmask problems in -current.
>
> If you set it to an larger boundary, it appears to be OK (e.g.
> I has to set 0x for 192.168.0.X to work).
D'oh. That fixed it alright. Thanks.
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 10:29:34PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> I hit this same problem. Robert pointed me at this patch and I've
> booted 10 kernels built since then.
Burried in my original post:
I'm also having problems with networking, seems like I can communicate
with stuff listening on
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 09:24:44PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : cc: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cpp0)
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~kan/gcc-cpp.diff
Cool. make depend works now, let's see if the resulting kernel does. :)
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECT
Attached is my config file, here's the error I'm getting:
make -V CFILES -V SYSTEM_CFILES -V GEN_CFILES -V GEN_M_CFILES | MKDEP_CPP="cc -
E" CC="cc" xargs mkdep -a -f .newdep -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qu
With a kernel from late 2 Oct 2002:
lock order reversal
1st 0xc048db40 spechash (spechash) @ ../../../kern/vfs_subr.c:2743
2nd 0xc1efede0 vnode interlock (vnode interlock) @
../../../kern/vfs_subr.c:2746
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current"
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:10:42PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> Have no idea what is your problem with linux_base, but rpm build fine
> here after one gets past __size_t and machine/types.h.
And how does one do that?
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe f
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:29:23AM +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> I tried CFLAGS with "-O[1|2]" and with or without "-march=-pentium3".
> Always the same error.
>
> Anyone else?
I'm seeing the exact same thing. I can't install linux_base either, nor
can I build rpm.
- alex
To Unsubscr
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:46:05PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> This is *totally* UNTRUE:
>
> /usr/local/bin//mutt:
> libslang.so => /usr/local/lib/libslang.so (0x280e5000)
> libm.so.2 => /usr/lib/libm.so.2 (0x28148000)
> libssl.so.2 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.2 (0x28167000)
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 08:19:53PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Looking forward to working with you all...
What? Darwin wasn't good enough for you?
Yuk, yuk, yuk.
Good luck getting it running :)
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 05:27:13PM -0700, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> Should I set debug.witness_ddb to 1 and get a trace from it? Or has this
> one already been seen?
It already fell over in exec, here's what it said:
GNU gdb 5.2.0 (FreeBSD) 20020627
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foun
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 01:56:38AM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> This is getting triggered by the kern.vnode sysctl. SMP or UP?
SMP kernel, 1 processor until I find a lower profile heatsink.
> Offhand
> I have a hard time seeing how the sequence
> vref(vp)
> do cpu bound stuff
>
So I'm trying to get the kernel to drop into ddb when it spews witness
stuff.. stuff like:
Aug 18 23:22:28 blarf kernel: ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with "process
lock" locked from ../../../kern/kern_exec.c:360
Aug 18 23:22:28 blarf last message repeated 2 times
Aug 18 23:28:12 b
../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with "process lock" locked from
../../../kern/kern_exec.c:360
lock order reversal
1st 0xc25bb160 process lock (process lock) @
../../../kern/kern_exec.c:360
2nd 0xc03eee00 filelist lock (filelist lock) @
../../../kern/kern_descrip.c:1113
../../../vm/um
This seems like a new one (previous kernels kept crashing with most
recently used by none).
FreeBSD blarf.homeip.net 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #6: Fri Aug 16 12:47:10 PDT
2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/ZIPPY_SMP_WITNESS i386
GNU gdb 5.2.0 (FreeBSD) 20020627
Co
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 08:07:29AM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> What I want to know is, our buildworld does not been supported without
> -O or not.
AFAIK it world should compile with -O (I seem to remember parts breaking
with -O0 for instance).
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTE
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 05:35:32PM -0400, Jim Bloom wrote:
> I believe the more interesting panic to debug is the first one here in
> mtrash_ctor and not the problem with syncing the disk after a panic. I have
> seen a few other panics in this routine posted to current over the last few
> weeks.
I got this while the system was swapping quite a bit (silly Gtk+
newsreader + supernews's huge retention == lots of memory used).
FreeBSD blarf.homeip.net 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #5: Wed Aug 14 00:39:15 PDT
2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/ZIPPY_SMP_WITNESS i386
GNU
I can buildworld no problem, play mp3s, read mail. But as soon as I play
around in X... boom the system falls over.
GNU gdb 5.2.0 (FreeBSD) 20020627
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and
My system is down to one cpu (the first slot is appears to have eaten
itself and using it results in interesting smells from the power supply),
but I'm still running a SMP kernel.
Anything else I should probe with gdb?
FreeBSD blarf.homeip.net 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #3: Wed Jul 24 13:13
* $FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c,v 1.319 2002/07/10 17:02:28 dillon Exp $
* $FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c,v 1.267 2002/07/02 17:09:22 mux Exp $
GNU gdb 5.2 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you ar
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:36:46PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> It'll drop into ddb every time you get a witness error and you'll have
> to tell ddb to continue. This could be a might annoying if you are
> getting errors ever ten seconds ...
I'm seeing this:
../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sle
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:34:50PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> > ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with "inp" locked from
>../../../netinet/tcp_subr.c:935
> > ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with "tcp" locked from
>../../../netinet/tcp_subr.c:928
>
> I've never seen that one. I'
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 02:43:54AM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> I haven't had any instability problems in a while on my UP box.
Seems like the UP kernels are more unstable for me. Go figure.
> > ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with "process lock" locked from
>../../../kern/kern_exec.c:3
GNU gdb 5.2 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty
After the rude awakening that I was after all running current, I've
finally turned on the WITNESS related options for my kernel (and boy is it
wickedly unstable as of now). Anyways.. is there any sort of list of
known warnings? I'm seeing a few consistantly relating to "pcm0:play:0",
"pcm0", "i
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 10:37:20AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Welcome to -current. I haven't been able to get crash dumps to
> work for a while :-(
>
> I usually set up a serial console between two machines and run
> gdb live to debug the kernel.
Crash dumps have been worki
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 06:46:05PM +0900, Takanori Watanabe wrote:
> Would you review this description?
How about:
--- acpi.4.orig Thu Jun 13 02:50:06 2002
+++ acpi.4 Fri Jul 5 21:16:59 2002
@@ -258,10 +258,35 @@
bus/children scan of the namespace.
The ACPI CA code will still
know abou
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 07:09:06PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> Not really. It is a transient bug that is almost as easy to fix as
> warn about.
So when can I expect the fix to be committed? :-D
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the bod
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 12:26:05PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> rtld still uses asms with the old, broken/fragile "0" constraint. This
> constraint is especially broken/fragile if things are pessimized by
> compiling without optimizations.
D'oh!
Is there any chance of sticking a warning in the
So what's up with -current?
I had to install gawk to get the kernel to build (and world too for that
matter).. I haven't had the balls to put the "one true awk" back in place.
But now whether in world mode or not I get:
blarf:/usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf#make
cc -O0 -Wall -DFREEBSD_ELF -I/usr/src/
Attached are the dmesg from a kernel that worked (I was away from my
'puter for a few months so I wasn't able to try -current between mid Feb
and now) and my kernel config. However, now it'll hang after detecting:
acpi_tz0: on acpi0
unless I disable the acpi thermal stuff with the debug.acpi.d
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 09:01:47PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> I think it's idiotic to put spackle over the broken window,
> paint the wall, and then call it "fixed".
I know what objprelink is, and as far as I'm concerned it's there to work
around the substandard support that C++ gets from the
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 06:40:37PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> The compile problems seem to be related to recent compiler toolchain
> changes, which you might not see unless you recompiled everything qt23
> depends on from scratch (which the package cluster does).
Right, when I tried to compil
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 04:31:44PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I'm just uploading a new 5.x package set. This run was better than
> the previous (5364 packages vs. 5123 for the last run, but far fewer
> than the 5973 packages which are building in 4.x), but there were
> still a number of signi
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 08:09:14AM -0700, Mark Peek wrote:
> Right, there is a new compile directory. Perhaps this needs to be
> added to UPDATING. Anyway, did you run "cvs update -dP" on your cvs
> tree? Or just do mkdir on the new path mentioned above.
It *IS* in UPDATING:
Updating Informat
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 05:16:41PM +0100, Ian Dowse wrote:
> One final annoyance is that using an alternate superblock will undo
> any changes made by tunefs, unless the '-A' flag had been used with
> tunefs originally. Typically this will result in soft-updates
> getting disabled.
Maybe -A shou
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 01:44:52PM -0700, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> The system just hung, and eventually rebooted. I was in X at the time..
> anyways's here's the trace:
And of course the system info (wc is enabled):
Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979,
The system just hung, and eventually rebooted. I was in X at the time..
anyways's here's the trace:
#0 dumpsys () at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:478
#1 0xc01dbdf3 in boot (howto=260) at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:321
#2 0xc01dc265 in panic (fmt=0xc03b6d05 "softdep_lock: lock held by %d")
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 04:13:47PM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> Playing mp3's with mpg123 has been quite satistfactory until now.
> Today I've discovered that every execution of sync(8) distorts
> music by means of "stretching" musical phrase.
The obvious answer would be to not run sync(8) :^
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 02:53:57PM +0100, Bob Bishop wrote:
> On reboot, I got the manual fsck jive with the "bad superblock: values
> disagree ,,with,, first alternate", and had to re-enable softupdates on /
This hasn't bit me ever.
> Abridged backtrace:
>
> panic()
> workitem_free()
> free_n
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 06:09:08PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The port qt23 as cvsup'd from current doesn't build, affects
> many related packets. Any clues ?
Depending on what you need Qt for, you can always build Qt oob, and it
should work pretty well.
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send m
> Yup, Kirk committed it. I really like the changes -- in the old days
> disk caches were tiny and directories were not well cached on top of that.
> It made sense to try to keep directories close to their files.
So I'm all excited now at the progress that ufs/ffs are making recently
The box itself is a dual P2-450, and I was attempting to rebuild a KDE
library (ah the joys of doing that), and monitoring stuff with top. The
first odd thing I noticed was that some of the processes showed up with an
state field (namely sed, and a few others I think). Eventually the box
panic'd
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 03:18:10AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
> 824 root -80 1048K 596K biord 0 0:38 0.00% 0.00% find
> 385 root 40 32740K 31944K select 1 0:32 0.00% 0.00% XFree86
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 06:12:29PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> I'm seeing a very strange problem with ps. I was calling "ps -U
>From what I can tell (I've seen this for a while), calling ps -U username
where username has no running processes (or none shown), will return such
an error. ps -U
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 03:48:03PM +0600, Boris Popov wrote:
> You need options LIBMCHAIN as well. We don't have mechanism for
> specifying dependancies between options as of yet. (sorry, should put a
> note in the NOTES).
OOps, okay. Thanks :)
OTOH, it seems that suspending a program (hi
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 04:39:53PM -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
> fsck all of your filesystems from single-user to remove the possibility
> of 'old' corruption (as in 'fsck', not 'fsck -p').
So if an fsck -f doesn't bomb out, the filesystem should be in an okay
state?
- alex
To Unsubscri
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 12:49:01AM -0800, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> The kernel that seems to work was built on Feb 18th, and the ones that
> aren't are from as recently as March 13th.
D'oh. Forgot the kernel config file and dmesg output.
The config file hasn't changed, bu
I haven't been able to track this down since the kernel won't panic.. but
with more recent kernels I've noticed:
* options NCP prevents the kernel from linking
* midi panics the system right after bootup
But the biggest problem seems to be the spontaneous rebooting. At first I
thought it might
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:38:50PM +0100, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> I wonder if this is known? If not, I can certainly provide more
> information. The offending sound hw is a Creative SB 64 AWE ISAPnP card. It
> works fine otherwise. (as it always has)
Yup I'm seeing this too. SMP kernel, AWE64
On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 06:47:09PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> Its alot harder to hang on a buildworld ... and not consistent, nor near
> as fast. startx will kill it each and every time based on a 'normal boot'
> ... the reason I was curious about the IRQs is that if I 'disabled'
> everyt
On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 03:18:39PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> My sound card overlaps with fxp0, and fxp1 overlaps with the
> HighPoint controller ...
>
> Grasping at straws here ...
Ditch the HPT366, it's crap and will cause system instabilities with
"fast" hard drives. I'm
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:03:24PM +0700, John Indra wrote:
> Is it safe to make world right now? Do KDE2 apps work flawlessly on newest
> -CURRENT? If there are people that can say yes to that answer, than I am
> ready to blow away all my /usr/X11R6 and /usr/local and build everything
> from scr
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 11:03:09PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > ls -lt libc.*
> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 599916 Feb 17 17:00 libc.so.5
> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel9 Feb 17 17:00 libc.so -> libc.so.5
> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1240424 Feb 17 17:00 libc.a
> -r--r--r-- 1 root wh
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 11:00:05PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> I removed everything from /var/db/pkg (pkg_delete -f ) before I started
> this, and then did an rm -rf /usr/local ... basically, brought it to bare
> system, including an rm -rf /usr/X11R6 ... anything left should be system
> in
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 10:49:06PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> the thing that is confusing me is that I'm getting through most of the
> qt-copy compile before I get hit with it ... I'm doing a fresh 'make
> world' on the machine, just in case ... then I'm going to try David's
> idea, if tha
> Now, if I start X, the whole machine hangs solid ...
Where? By all means, set KDE_DEBUG, and capture the startx output, and do
something with the coredumps so that you encode the pid into the file
name, since many kde crashes will be in kdeinit (since it's used to launch
programs via shlibs)..
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:28:30PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> Attached is a patch that attempts to work around recent stdio
> breakage in -current. I've verified it compiles, but won't be
> able to test it until at least tomorrow. If someone wants to
> review it and verify it works, I'll com
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 02:20:30PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> You can do better than this. Put the lock in FILE, and define a new
> structure FILE_old, which has the same size/layout as the old FILE
> structure.
How is this more acceptable than bumping the major number? Are they
really so pr
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 02:19:36PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> Changes of this magnitude require a bump of the major number, even
> though we've already done that in -current. It breaks nearly
> everything, including the upgrade path. Alternatively, the locking
> changes need to be backed out.
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:28:03PM -0600, Patrick Hartling wrote:
> ldd was telling me that it had both libc.so.3 and libc.so.5 which seemed
> very bad to me. When I recomipled LyX to see if that would fix things,
> I noticed that ld was giving a warning about libc.so.3 and libc.so.5
> potential
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 02:32:38AM -0800, Jason Evans wrote:
> Several of us have started experiencing problems with kernels that won't
> boot. The symptom is hard to miss: the machine locks up at the spinner
> just before printing the copyright message at the beginning of the boot
> sequence.
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 03:43:27PM +0100, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> The messages did not start with SMPNG but got a *lot* more frequent in the
> last couple of weeks, making listening to mp3-s a real annoyance during any
> more serious system activity. (Earlier, ie in the early fall and in the
>
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 09:36:13PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> There is a known problem with fast disks (so far only the IBM DTLA series)
> and some old controllers fx the HPT366...
Hrm... since when?
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" i
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 06:50:22PM -0400, Evan Tsoukalas wrote:
> The following morning, I came in to find the panic I described in
> my previous post. I was hoping that, to some far more
> knowledgeable than I, that panic and trace would point the finger
> at a specific piece of hardware. FWIW
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 01:58:46PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> Support for master/slave combinations, and ATA/ATAPI ditto is being
> worked on, but this requires a controller with support for the
> "auto nop" functionality. Which of the many different controllers
> supports this is unkn
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 03:46:20PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
> Personally, I'm astonished that an SMP kernel will actually boot
> and run on a uniprocessor machine.
Grr, still getting used to mutt, and I didn't reply to the list. Yes, I'm
using an SMP board, and waiting on the arrival o
In upgrading my system I've bought a shiny new SMP mobo to go with my new
30gb Deskstar... The nice thing about this new board is my HighPoint
HPT366 based IDE controller works now (Buggy Phoenix BIOSes prevented it
from working before). Perhaps in a rush to get started, I've compiled and
been u
What version of XFree86 are you using? Make sure it's != 4.0.0.
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> pam_ssh isn't able to start ssh-agent if you use
> ---snip---
> xdm session sufficient pam_ssh.so
> ---snip---
> in /etc/pam.conf. With "malloc.conf -> aj" it seems to work.
I've seen problems like this (try using Konqueror with malloc.c
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> If it helps any, I setup an anoncvs mirror for most of the stuff ... not
> sure if it helps any, since you are working off of snapshots, but its
> updated every 4hrs from the central repository, and the CVSROOT for it was
> announced on kde-devel ..
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Leif Neland wrote:
> This works nicely in Windows (Outlook Express), but I'd like to try using
> the same key with openssl to generate crypted (to myself) or signed
> messages.
>
> I can export the key as a .cer, .p7b or .pfx, but openssl seems to want it
> in .pem format.
On Thursday, April 20 2000, 01:15:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
>On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
>
>> I cvsup'ed, built world and kernel. Hhmm, actually I see no reason why
>> there should be a problem since everything should be done by make world.
>
>make world doesn't build a ker
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> Good idea, terrible name. Can't you guys some up with something better? :)
reallybigbootthing.flp?
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Jay Oliver wrote:
> Ok... how is it possible to identify different revisions? As far as I can
> tell, the cards are being reported to be identical, though they're almost
> certainly not. And since they both worked fine under 'pn', will it be
> possible in the future to have
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Jay Oliver wrote:
> dc0: port 0xde00-0xdeff mem
> 0xdfffbf00-0xdfffbff
> dc0: Ethernet address: 00:a0:cc:32:a6:31
Different "revisions" of the Linksys NICs use different chips, so problems
that afflict one "revision" quite possibly have nothing to do with the
other card wor
On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Theo van Klaveren wrote:
> stereofftscope.cpp:~80: sorry, not implemented. (something about symbol
> to big for symbol table). Recompile all your sources with -fhuge-objects.
>
> I finished the build with make -k, but I have no arts :( I suspect this to
> be a FreeBSD problem
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Will Andrews wrote:
> If you're gonna use a port, use ports for its dependencies too. You'd be
> stupid not to use the ports whenever you can. No one has ever provided
> me a convincing reason why this is not true.
Well when you want to keep multiple versions of kde or qt ar
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Ilmar S. Habibulin wrote:
> Who is porting gcc to freebsd? I have some problems with development
> vertion of kdes' new filemanager/browser. It can't find function
> eh_rtime_match, which i found in libgcc.a. What for is this function,
> should libgcc.a be linked with -lgcc f
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Donn Miller wrote:
> > Just a thought - have you tried -fno-c++--exceptions (or similar) ?
> > I'm not sure if that would fix it, though.
>
> I think maybe you mean -fno-vtable-thunks? Also, why do we have a
> separate libstdc++? I know that the standard gcc-2.95.2 itself
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Gary Palmer wrote:
> > /me looks at the stack of 386sx chips he has and wonders why no-one did 8
> > way SMP with these!
>
> You never heard of the Sequent boxes, did you? :)
In fact I haven't.
But I also don't have DXs either. :)
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [E
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Then, please send me the same information: how did you upgrade? what did
> you have before? what's the date of your present world?
Make installworld, dunno but it was at least a few weeks old, and the
present world was built last night.
> Anyway...
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >FWIW this doesn't happen with my card:
> >
> >fxp0: port 0x1000-0x103f mem 0xf400-0xf40
> >f,0xf410-0xf4100fff irq 10 at device 15.0 on pci0
> >fxp0: Ethernet address 00:90:27:d1:83:6a
> >fxp0: supplying EUI64: 00:90:27:ff:fe:d1:83:6
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, kibbet wrote:
> /me looks at the bunch of 386 mobo's... lets not go there.. :)
/me looks at the stack of 386sx chips he has and wonders why no-one did 8
way SMP with these!
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the bo
1 - 100 of 217 matches
Mail list logo
