Re: if_bridge(): IPv6 EUI-64 seemingly not working

2025-06-11 Thread FreeBSD User
On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 04:58:30 +0100 Lexi Winter wrote: > A FreeBSD User: > > When it comes to obtain an IPv6, CURRENT, in contrast to 14-STABLE, > > fails to set the host part according EUI-64. The resulting 64 host > > bit, which are considered to contain the 48 bit of the MAC, do > > contain any

Re: if_bridge(): IPv6 EUI-64 seemingly not working

2025-06-11 Thread Lexi Winter
A FreeBSD User: > When it comes to obtain an IPv6, CURRENT, in contrast to 14-STABLE, > fails to set the host part according EUI-64. The resulting 64 host > bit, which are considered to contain the 48 bit of the MAC, do contain > anything but not anything similar to ANY of the attached NIC/NICs.

Re: Future of jemalloc on FreeBSD after archive

2025-06-11 Thread Enji Cooper (yaneurabeya)
> On Jun 10, 2025, at 8:20 AM, Bakul Shah wrote: > > Looks like there is https://github.com/facebook/Jemalloc > See https://x.com/permutans/status/1931398314924150814 Interesting. Given Meta’s drive to implement/deploy GenAI today, it’ll be interesting to see how exactly this dynamic plays out

Re: Future of jemalloc on FreeBSD after archive

2025-06-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 at 10:13, Amar Takhar wrote: > On 2025-06-10 16:24 +, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > > Why not move the repo or break the fork so issues work? This feels like > > flailing around without understanding how github works and does not > > inspire confidence. > > FYI issues do work

Re: Future of jemalloc on FreeBSD after archive

2025-06-11 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 06:53:29AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 10:54:34AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 6:53???AM Brooks Davis wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 08:15:02AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: > > > > On 10 Jun 2025, at 00:17