Re: RFC: Solaris style extended attributes for FreeBSD

2025-05-04 Thread Lexi Winter
Rick Macklem: > I have coded this, but having a pathconf name for something that is > specific to a file is a bit weird. kib@ has suggested that it might be > better to do it as an ioctl(). > > So, do you think a pathconf variable is preferred, since it is > "Solaris compatible" or an ioctl()? io

Re: pkg: invalid option --, and pkg: illegal option --

2025-05-04 Thread Yusuf Yaman
I can confirm that reverting commit be61deae0aa2 fixes the PKG. Sent from Proton Mail Android Original Message On 5/4/25 7:28 PM, Yusuf Yaman wrote: > Thanks for reporting that, I just noticed that problem too. Hope it gets > fixed soon. > > Sent from Proton Mail Android

Re: pkg: invalid option --, and pkg: illegal option --

2025-05-04 Thread Yusuf Yaman
Thanks for reporting that, I just noticed that problem too. Hope it gets fixed soon. Sent from Proton Mail Android Original Message On 5/2/25 9:33 AM, Graham Perrin wrote: > root@mowa219-gjp4-zbook-freebsd:~ # pkg version -C -vRL= | grep -v orphaned > pkg: invalid option -

Re: RFC: Solaris style extended attributes for FreeBSD

2025-05-04 Thread Rick Macklem
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 3:08 AM Lionel Cons wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 at 17:14, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 3:34 AM Cedric Blancher > > wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 at 00:02, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > > > > > First off, I cross posted because I don't thin