Re: elfcopy: not found

2025-04-08 Thread Ed Maste
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 at 21:50, Sulev-Madis Silber wrote: > > --- boot1.efi --- > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1704067200 elfcopy -j .peheader -j .text -j .sdata -j > .data -j . > dynamic -j .dynsym -j .rel.dyn -j .rela.dyn -j .reloc -j .eh_frame > --output-target > =binary boot1.sym boot1.efi > sh: elfco

Re: elfcopy: not found

2025-04-08 Thread Sulev-Madis Silber
why meta mode would be important here? wasn't that just a cache to make incremental builds faster maybe ln -svi /usr/bin/{obj,elf}copy rather? unsure if it fixed it fully. it did build. i hope that efi loader actually works too now it likes to override path i guess (for clean env?) so it d

Re: UPDATE: pkg 2.1.0 looks to be making official bulk builds of packages take much longer [Just notes based on various official www/gitlab@ee and @ce build times]

2025-04-08 Thread Mark Millard
The below indicates that whatever is taking the extra time is not strongly tied to processor performance. www/gitlab@ee and www/gitlab@ce turn out to be good for seeing larger scale elapsed time multiplication factors. That allows seeing this. I'll note that when, for example, www/gitlab@ee is bui

Re: pfil_default_to_drop

2025-04-08 Thread Robert Austen
I respectfully disagree. PF_DEFAULT_TO_DROP has no effect if pfctl does not perform its ioctl call to enable itself, ie. to apply any hooks. if pfctl fails, then the hooks are left unhooked, and EVERYTHING defaults to PASS, which is not what most people would intend using PF_DEFAULT_TO_DROP. co

Re: UPDATE: pkg 2.1.0 looks to be making official bulk builds of packages take much longer [a specific package with large time factor]

2025-04-08 Thread Mark Millard
On Apr 7, 2025, at 13:15, Mark Millard wrote: > On Apr 7, 2025, at 10:15, Mark Millard wrote: > >> On Apr 7, 2025, at 09:44, Mark Millard wrote: >> >>> On Apr 7, 2025, at 08:14, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> On Mon 07 Apr 08:07, Mark Millard wrote: > . . . Listing like t