Re: UPDATE: pkg 2.1.0 looks to be making official bulk builds of packages take much longer [it is more complicated then that for aarch64]

2025-04-06 Thread Gleb Popov
On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 2:44 AM Mark Millard wrote: > > So: 2 min 31 sec or so difference for overall somewhat over an > hour, i.e., 151 sec or so. That is under 1 sec per package > built. If the slowdown comes from handling shlib provides/requires, then this obviously depends on the amount of dep

VNASSERT failed: vp-›v_holdent › 0 not true at /home/pkgbuild/worktrees/main/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:3391 (vget_finish_ref)

2025-04-06 Thread Mark Millard
[Somewhat hand corrected "OCR" conversion of some console image content.] VNASSERT failed: vp->v_holdcnt > 0 not true at /home/pkgbuild/worktrees/main/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:3391 (vget_finish_ref) 0xa006e11e6a50: type VDIR state VSTATE_CONSTRUCTED op 0x0001a2cb40f0 usecount 1, writecount

Re: UPDATE: pkg 2.1.0 looks to be making official bulk builds of packages take much longer [it is more complicated then that for aarch64]

2025-04-06 Thread Mark Millard
[For the most part the prior history of my notes is not important so they are mostly omitted this time.] It looks like my notes about official bulk package builds taking longer may be from observations of more than one distinct issue, one leading to a very rough factor of 2 and the other not leadi

Re: UPDATE: pkg 2.1.0 looks to be making official bulk builds of packages take much longer [it is more complicated then that for aarch64]

2025-04-06 Thread Mark Millard
[Correcting a dumb mistaken reference.] On Apr 6, 2025, at 16:43, Mark Millard wrote: > [For the most part the prior history of my notes is not > important so they are mostly omitted this time.] > > It looks like my notes about official bulk package builds > taking longer may be from observatio

Re: Heads Up: commit 2ec2ba7e232d just hit main

2025-04-06 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 5:45 PM Shawn Webb wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 05:36:07PM -0700, Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 4:43 PM Shawn Webb > > wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 04:12:15PM -0700, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 9:12 AM Shawn Webb

Re: RFC: Implementation of RFC 7217 [A Method for Generating Semantically Opaque Interface Identifiers, with IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC)]

2025-04-06 Thread Marek Zarychta
W dniu 6.04.2025 o 16:49, Guido Falsi pisze: Hi! I have recently implemented and tested the patch at [1], which implements RFC 7217, about generating IPv6 addresses that are constant through reboots, but do not expose the MAC address of the machine, not being in any way derived by those. I'

Re: UPDATE: pkg 2.1.0 looks to be making official bulk builds of packages take much longer

2025-04-06 Thread Mark Millard
[I thought of another question.] On Apr 6, 2025, at 10:53, Mark Millard wrote: > On Apr 6, 2025, at 08:39, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> Le 5 avril 2025 06:58:12 GMT+02:00, Mark Millard a écrit >> : >>> [This is an update of earlier notes, now that I've noticed what >>> is different for the

Re: UPDATE: pkg 2.1.0 looks to be making official bulk builds of packages take much longer

2025-04-06 Thread Mark Millard
On Apr 6, 2025, at 08:39, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Le 5 avril 2025 06:58:12 GMT+02:00, Mark Millard a écrit : >> [This is an update of earlier notes, now that I've noticed what >> is different for the contexts that not seeing larger time frames >> in the Mar-29/Apr-01 bulk build starts of off

Re: UPDATE: pkg 2.1.0 looks to be making official bulk builds of packages take much longer

2025-04-06 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Le 5 avril 2025 06:58:12 GMT+02:00, Mark Millard a écrit : >[This is an update of earlier notes, now that I've noticed what >is different for the contexts that not seeing larger time frames >in the Mar-29/Apr-01 bulk build starts of official package builds.] > >The context here is the official bul

RFC: Implementation of RFC 7217 [A Method for Generating Semantically Opaque Interface Identifiers, with IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC)]

2025-04-06 Thread Guido Falsi
Hi! I have recently implemented and tested the patch at [1], which implements RFC 7217, about generating IPv6 addresses that are constant through reboots, but do not expose the MAC address of the machine, not being in any way derived by those. I'd like to get comments, testing and review for