On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 4:28 PM Steve Rikli wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 02:40:15PM -0800, Rick Macklem wrote:
> >
> > The subject line basically describes the problem glebius@
> > ran into. When doing an NFS mount in /etc/fstab, it failed
> > since the DNS service was not yet working and,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 02:40:15PM -0800, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
> The subject line basically describes the problem glebius@
> ran into. When doing an NFS mount in /etc/fstab, it failed
> since the DNS service was not yet working and, as such,
> the DNS lookup of the server fqdn failed, causing th
Hi,
I've submitted a change proposal to fix this (and potentially other problems):
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D49084
Please feel free to comment/review there.
For olivier@:
I'd be interested in seeing the full output of (minus serial numbers of course):
kenv | grep -F smbios
in all the cases yo
Hi,
DNS resolvers can fail transiently, as can UDP. At least some retries seem to
make sense.
(I don’t use NFS; this is a general comment.)
Regards,
Jan M.
> On 19. Feb 2025, at 23:40, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The subject line basically describes the problem glebius@
> ran into. Wh
Van: Rick Macklem
Datum: woensdag, 19 februari 2025 23:40
Aan: FreeBSD CURRENT
CC: Gleb Smirnoff
Onderwerp: RFC: mount_nfs failure due to dns not running yet
Hi,
The subject line basically describes the problem glebius@
ran into. When doing an NFS mount in /etc/fstab, it failed
since the DN
In fact, in C having a struct without members is undefined behavior:
> If the struct-declaration-list does not contain any named members, either
> directly or via an anonymous structure or anonymous union, the behavior is
> undefined.
However, gcc allows this as an extension, and clang has appa
No, that’s always been the case in C++. It comes from the rule that two
allocations must have unique addresses. If a structure could have size zero,
an array of these structures would have size zero and the two elements in the
array would have the same address. Similarly, two struct fields co
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:40:54 +
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Is this a bug ?
>
>
> critter phk> cat /tmp/_.c
>
> #include
> struct foo {
> };
>
> int
> main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> struct foo bar;
> printf("%jd %j
Is this a bug ?
critter phk> cat /tmp/_.c
#include
struct foo {
};
int
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
struct foo bar;
printf("%jd %jd\n", sizeof(struct foo), sizeof(bar));
return (0);
Hi,
I get this backtrace:
---snip---
[102] panic: invalid local group size 16 and count 16
[102] cpuid = 17
[102] time = 1740041984
[102] KDB: stack backtrace:
[102] db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame
0xfe07453a5b80
[102] vpanic() at vpanic+0x136/frame 0xfe07453
10 matches
Mail list logo
