Re: 1500024, libmd.so.6 and libmd.so.7 (was: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?))

On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 09:38:24PM +0100, Graham Perrin wrote: > On 02/10/2024 14:19, dsdq...@hotmail.com wrote: > > … (now) missing libmd.so.6. … > > > > > sys: Chase libmd version bump with a __FreeBSD_vers

1500024, libmd.so.6 and libmd.so.7 (was: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?))

On 02/10/2024 14:19, dsdq...@hotmail.com wrote: … (now) missing libmd.so.6. … sys: Chase libmd version bump with a __FreeBSD_version bump · freebsd/freebsd-src@e3953c0

Re: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?)

FWIW make itself does not care about whether there is space after -j or not. Both -j14 -j 14 will result in "-j 14" being added to .MAKEFLAGS (something that really annoys me ;-) So not even a makefile that is attempting to parse .MAKEFLAGS is likely to be screwing things up. In short; I would e

Re: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?)

Dan Mack wrote: > Ack, okay. I can't trigger it with a fresh or my /usr/obj but in any > event the error number 6 is probably referring to a path or directory > missing while doing a parallel build given some input state :-) See the BUGS section of make(1): In jobs mode, when a target fai

Re: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?)

On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 1:28 PM David Wolfskill wrote: > I have been tracking stable/ and head (daily, with a few exceptions) for > many years, now. Over time, I set up a set of ([t]csh) aliases to > simplify the exercise for me. > > Until yesterday, the "make -j${max_jobs} buildworld" construct

Re: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?)

On Wed, 2 Oct 2024, Dan Mack wrote: On Wed, 2 Oct 2024, Warner Losh wrote: Ack, okay.   I can't trigger it with a fresh or my /usr/obj but in any event the error number 6 is probably referring to a path or directory missing while doing a parallel build given

Re: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?)

On Wed, 2 Oct 2024, Warner Losh wrote: Ack, okay.   I can't trigger it with a fresh or my /usr/obj but in any event the error number 6 is probably referring to a path or directory missing while doing a parallel build given some input state :-) #define ENXIO           6 

Re: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?)

On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 08:19:25PM +0700, dsdq...@hotmail.com wrote: > ... > Just got the same error, but both invocations didn't work, and I noticed > that bootstrapped version of mtree failed to run because of (now) > missing libmd.so.6. I think it's not really related to whitespace > between -j

Re: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?)

On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 8:42 AM Dan Mack wrote: > On Wed, 2 Oct 2024, dsdq...@hotmail.com wrote: > > > Dan Mack wrote: > >> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024, dsdq...@hotmail.com wrote: > >> > >>> David Wolfskill wrote: > I have been tracking stable/ and head (daily, with a few exceptions) > for > many

Re: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?)

On Wed, 2 Oct 2024, dsdq...@hotmail.com wrote: Dan Mack wrote: On Wed, 2 Oct 2024, dsdq...@hotmail.com wrote: David Wolfskill wrote: I have been tracking stable/ and head (daily, with a few exceptions) for many years, now.  Over time, I set up a set of ([t]csh) aliases to simplify the exerci

Re: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?)

Dan Mack wrote: > On Wed, 2 Oct 2024, dsdq...@hotmail.com wrote: > >> David Wolfskill wrote: >>> I have been tracking stable/ and head (daily, with a few exceptions) for >>> many years, now.  Over time, I set up a set of ([t]csh) aliases to >>> simplify the exercise for me. >>> >>> Until yesterday

Re: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?)

On Wed, 2 Oct 2024, dsdq...@hotmail.com wrote: David Wolfskill wrote: I have been tracking stable/ and head (daily, with a few exceptions) for many years, now. Over time, I set up a set of ([t]csh) aliases to simplify the exercise for me. Until yesterday, the "make -j${max_jobs} buildworld" c

Re: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?)

David Wolfskill wrote: > I have been tracking stable/ and head (daily, with a few exceptions) for > many years, now. Over time, I set up a set of ([t]csh) aliases to > simplify the exercise for me. > > Until yesterday, the "make -j${max_jobs} buildworld" construct had > worked without issue, but

Re: weekly locate error Was: September 2024 stabilization week

Kyle Evans wrote: > This is the problem I have with mailing lists; 2/3 responses didn't go > back and read the critical bit of context to my stance (but at least you > still included it in your quote, the other one trimmed it entirely): I quoted the part I was referring to. I trimmed the rest,

FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?)

I have been tracking stable/ and head (daily, with a few exceptions) for many years, now. Over time, I set up a set of ([t]csh) aliases to simplify the exercise for me. Until yesterday, the "make -j${max_jobs} buildworld" construct had worked without issue, but (yesterday), the invocation failed

Re: weekly locate error Was: September 2024 stabilization week

Hi Kyle, > This is the problem I have with mailing lists; This is not only a problem with mailing lists, but more generally with written communication. > 2/3 responses didn't go back and read the critical bit of context to my > stance (but at least you > still included it in your quote, the